Abstract
All attempts to solve the three-body problem described in the previous chapters have greatly enriched celestial and classical mechanics. However, the ubiquity of fast computers with modes of operation that allow for parallel computations, numerical solutions have been the driving force in finding and studying possible solutions to the three-body problem. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of common numerical schemes in terms of the mathematics of the algorithms used, as well as short examples written in the open-source programming language Python. The topics included in our discussion deal with numerical integration of the three-body problem, Fourier analysis, determination of mean motion resonances, and chaos indicators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See http://rebound.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ipython/PoincareMap.html for a working example using REBOUND.
References
R. Barnes, R. Greenberg, Stability limits in extrasolar planetary systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 647, L163–L166 (2006)
G. Benettin, L. Galgani, A. Giorgilli, J.-M. Strelcyn, Lyapunov characteristic exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for hamiltonian systems – a method for computing all of them. I – theory. II – numerical application. Meccanica 15, 9–30 (1980)
J.E. Chambers, A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 304, 793–799 (1999). doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02379.x
P. Cincotta, C. Simó, Conditional entropy. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 73, 195–209 (1999)
P.M. Cincotta, C. Simó, Simple tools to study global dynamics in non-axisymmetric galactic potentials - i. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 147, 205–228 (2000)
R. Dvorak, E. Pilat-Lohinger, E. Bois, R. Schwarz, B. Funk, C. Beichman, W. Danchi, C. Eiroa, M. Fridlund, T. Henning, T. Herbst, L. Kaltenegger, H. Lammer, A. Léger, R. Liseau, J. Lunine, F. Paresce, A. Penny, A. Quirrenbach, H. Røttgering, F. Selsis, J. Schneider, D. Stam, G. Tinetti, G.J. White, Dynamical habitability of planetary systems. Astrobiology 10, 33–43 (2010)
C. Froeschlé, E. Lega, R. Gonczi, Fast lyapunov indicators. application to asteroidal motion. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 67, 41–62 (1997)
B. Funk, R. Schwarz, E. Pilat-Lohinger, Á. Süli, R. Dvorak, Stability of inclined orbits of terrestrial planets in habitable zones. Planet. Space Sci. 57, 434–440 (2009)
K. Goździewski, Stability of the 47 uma planetary system. Astron. Astrophys. 393, 997–1013 (2002)
K. Goździewski, E. Bois, A.J. Maciejewski, L. Kiseleva-Eggleton, Global dynamics of planetary systems with the megno criterion. Astron. Astrophys. 378, 569–586 (2001)
K. Goździewski, E. Bois, A.J. Maciejewski, Global dynamics of the gliese 876 planetary system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 332, 839–855 (2002b)
K. Goździewski, M. Słonina, C. Migaszewski, A. Rozenkiewicz, Testing a hypothesis of the ν octantis planetary system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 533–545 (2013)
E. Hairer, S.P. Nørsett, G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems, 2nd Revised edn. (Springer, New York, 1993). ISBN 0-387-56670-8
D.P. Hamilton, A comparison of lorentz, planetary gravitational, and satellite gravitational resonances. Icarus 109, 221–240 (1994)
R.C. Hilborn, Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994)
T.C. Hinse, A.A. Christou, J.L.A. Alvarellos, K. Goździewski, Application of the megno technique to the dynamics of jovian irregular satellites. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 404, 837–857 (2010)
H. Kinoshita, H. Yoshida, H. Nakai, Symplectic integrators and their application to dynamical astronomy. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 50, 59–71 (1991)
T. Kotoulas, G. Voyatzis, Comparative study of the 2:3 and 3:4 resonant motion with neptune: an application of symplectic mappings and low frequency analysis. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 88, 343–363 (2004)
Y. Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity. Astron. J. 67, 591 (1962)
G. Laughlin, J. Chambers, D. Fischer, A dynamical analysis of the 47 ursae majoris planetary system. Astrophys. J. 579, 455–467 (2002)
M.L. Lidov, The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies. Planet. Space Sci. 9, 719–759 (1962)
A.M. Lyapunov, Probléme général de la stabilité du mouvement. Annals de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse (3) 9, 203–474 (1907)
R.A. Mardling, Resonance, chaos and stability: the three-body problem in astrophysics, in The Cambridge N-Body Lectures, ed. by S.J. Aarseth, C.A. Tout, R.A. Mardling. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 760 (Springer, Berlin, 2008), p. 59
C. Migaszewski, M. Słonina, K. Goździewski, A dynamical analysis of the kepler-11 planetary system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 427, 770–789 (2012)
S. Mikkola, K. Innanen, Symplectic tangent map for planetary motions. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 74, 59–67 (1999). doi:10.1023/A:1008312912468
C.D. Murray, S.F. Dermott, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)
Z.E. Musielak, D.E. Musielak, High-dimensional chaos in dissipative and driven dynamical systems. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 19, 2823–2869 (2009)
A.I. Pavlov, A.J. Maciejewski, An efficient method for studying the stability and dynamics of the rotational motions of celestial bodies. Astron. Lett. 29, 552–566 (2003)
E. Pilat-Lohinger, B. Funk, R. Dvorak, Stability limits in double stars. a study of inclined planetary orbits. Astron. Astrophys. 400, 1085–1094 (2003)
W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992)
H. Rein, D.S. Spiegel, IAS15: a fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 1424–1437 (2015). doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2164
H. Rein, D. Tamayo, WHFAST: a fast and unbiased implementation of a symplectic Wisdom-Holman integrator for long-term gravitational simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 376–388 (2015). doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1257
H. Rein, D. Tamayo, Second-order variational equations for N-body simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 459, 2275–2285 (2016). doi:10.1093/mnras/stw644
S. Satyal, B. Quarles, T.C. Hinse, Application of chaos indicators in the study of dynamics of s-type extrasolar planets in stellar binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 433, 2215–2225 (2013)
V. Szebehely, Theory of Orbits: The Restricted Problem of Three Bodies (Academic Press, New York/London, 1967)
V. Szebehely, C.F. Peters, Complete solution of a general problem of three bodies. Astron. J. 72, 876 (1967a)
J. Tailleur, J. Kurchan, Probing rare physical trajectories with Lyapunov weighted dynamics. Nat. Phys. 3, 203–207 (2007). doi:10.1038/nphys515
M. Šuvakov, V. Dmitrašinović, Three classes of newtonian three-body planar periodic orbits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(11), 114301 (2013)
J. Wisdom, M. Holman, Symplectic maps for the n-body problem – stability analysis. Astron. J. 104, 2022–2029 (1992)
A. Wolf, J.B. Swift, H.L. Swinney, J.A. Vastano, Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica D 16, 285–317 (1985). doi:10.1016/0167-2789(85)90011-9
H. Yoshida, Construction of higher order symplectic integrators. Phys. Lett. A 150, 262–268 (1990). doi:10.1016/0375-9601(90)90092-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musielak, Z., Quarles, B. (2017). Numerical Solutions. In: Three Body Dynamics and Its Applications to Exoplanets. SpringerBriefs in Astronomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58226-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58226-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58225-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58226-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)