Abstract
As one of the major ‘producers’ of climate change research, higher education institutions have had a key role to play in getting the climate change on the policy agenda. As the call for action on climate change intensifies, researchers within institutions will face new demands, with new challenges and opportunities, to inform policy to support both mitigation and adaptation. However, the uncertain, complex and interdisciplinary nature of climate change as an issue, combined with the inevitably highly politicised context of climate change action, means that involvement with policy will have a number of potential pitfalls. This paper draws lessons from recent research into the role of science within water resource management, to consider the challenges and opportunities higher institutions might face at the science–policy interface for climate change research. It notes that simply providing knowledge might be limited by uncertainty and politicisation, and suggests that collaborative, co-learning approaches might be more useful. Such approaches will require resource intensive interactions between scientists and stakeholders, as well as suitable governance arrangements. However, the paper argues that this focus on collaboration provides opportunities and could have multiple benefits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
Bauer, A., Feichtinger, J., & Steurer, R. (2011). The governance of climate change adaptation in ten OECD countries : Challenges and approaches. Institute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy: Vienna
Blackmore, C. (2007). What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 512–525. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007
Clemencon, R. (2016). The Two Sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal Failure or Historic Breakthrough? The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/1070496516631362
Collins, K., & Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(6), 358–373. doi:10.1002/eet.523
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs P., Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 24024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Cottingham, R., Delfau, K. F., & Garde, P. (2010). Managing diffuse water pollution in South East Queensland An analysis of the role of the Healthy Waterways Partnership. Brisbane: International Water Centre
Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, 90(3), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009EO030002
Dowling, R. (2008). Geographies of identity: labouring in the “neoliberal” university. Progress in Human Geography, 32(6), 812–820. doi:10.1177/0309132507088032
Durose, C., & Rummery, K. (2006). Governance and Collaboration: Review Article. Social Policy and Society, 5(02), 315. doi:10.1017/S147474640500299X
Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Giddens, A. (2009). Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Grant, W. J. (2012, May 4). The “impact” of research carries weight (but ripples matter more). The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/the-impact-of-research-carries-weight-but-ripples-matter-more-6820
Grundmann, R. (2002). Transnational policy networks and the role of advocacy scientists: from ozone layer protection to climate change. Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change “Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, 405–414. Retrieved from http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/1496/
Grundmann, R. (2007). Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics, 16(3), 414–432. doi:10.1080/09644010701251656
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408. doi:10.1177/016224390102600401
Head, B. W. (2008). Three Lenses of Evidence-Based Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
Head, B. W. (2010). Water policy—Evidence, learning and the governance of uncertainty. Policy and Society, 29(2), 171–180. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.007
Hoppe, R. (2010). From “knowledge use” towards “boundary work”. Sketch of an emerging new agenda for inquiry into science-policy interaction. In R. J. in’t Veld (Ed.), Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media (pp. 169–186). Heidleberg: Springer. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/robert_hoppe1/15
Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A., & Cairns, R. (2013). Lost in the problem: The role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(4), 283–300. doi:10.1002/wcc.225
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (R. K. Pachauri & L. A. Meyer, Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland.
Javey, A. (2012). Measuring academic impact. ACS Nano, 6(8), 6529. doi:10.1021/nn303711b
Kasperson, R. (2011). Characterizing the Science/Practice Gap. In R. Kasperson & M. Berberian (Eds.), Integrating Science and Policy (pp. 3–22). London: Earthscan.
Kellow, A. (2007). Science and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lackey, R. T. (2007). Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 21(1), 12–17. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30(2), 333–349. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0
Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources, 23(10), 986–1001. doi:10.1080/08941920802178214
Lovbrand, E., & Oberg, G. (2005). Comment on “How science makes environmental controversies worse” by Daniel Sarewitz, Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 385–403 and “When Scientists politicise science: making sense of the controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist” by Roger A. Pielke Jr., Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 405–417. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(2), 195–197. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.12.007
Mackenzie, J., Tan, P.-L., Hoverman, S., & Baldwin, C. (2012). The value and limitations of Participatory Action Research methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.008
May, B., & Plummer, R. (2011). Accommodating the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation and Governance in Conventional Risk Management: Adaptive Collaborative Risk Management (ACRM). Ecology And Society, 16(1), 47.
Michaels, S. (2009). Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7), 994–1011. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.05.002
Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 478–500. doi:10.1177/016224390102600405
Morgan, E. A. (2014). Science & Sustainability: The Use of Science and the Science–Policy Interface in Sustainable Water Resource Management. Griffith University.
Morgan, E. A., & Cole-Hawthorne, R. (2016). Applying a shared understanding between Aboriginal and Western knowledge to challenge unsustainable neo-liberal planning policy and practice. Australian Planner, 53(1), 54–62. doi:10.1080/07293682.2015.1135815
Morgan, E. A., & Grant-Smith, D. C. C. (2015). Tales of science and defiance: the case for co-learning and collaboration in bridging the science/emotion divide in water recycling debates. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(10), 1770–1788. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.954691
Morgan, E. A., & Osborne, N. (2016). It’s the Lungfish, Stupid: Knowledge Fights, Activism, and the Science-Policy Interface. Geographical Research, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12181
Morrison, T. H. (2007). Multiscalar Governance and Regional Environmental Management in Australia. Space and Polity, 11(3), 227–241. doi:10.1080/13562570701811551
Morrison, T. H., McDonald, G. T., & Lane, M. B. (2004). Integrating Natural Resource Management for Better Environmental Outcomes. Australian Geographer, 35(3), 243–258. doi:10.1080/0004918042000311304
Oreskes, N. (2004). Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Parker, J., & Crona, B. (2012). All things to all people: Boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 262–289. doi:10.1177/0306312711435833
Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2015). Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133(1), 113–127. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0
Pielke Jr, R. A. (2004). When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 405–417. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.004
Pielke Jr, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/0S0008423908080992
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
Rijke, J., Brown, R., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Farrelly, M., Morison, P., & van Herk, S. (2012). Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environmental Science and Policy, 22, 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010
Sarewitz, D. R. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
Slob, A. F. L., Rijnveld, M., Chapman, A. S., & Strosser, P. (2007). Challenges of linking scientific knowledge to river basin management policy: AquaTerra as a case study. Environmental Pollution, 148(3), 867–74. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.048
Spruijt, P., Knol, A. B., Vasileiadou, E., Devilee, J., Lebret, E., & Petersen, A. C. (2014). Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002
Steyaert, P., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 575–586. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.011
Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 354–365. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs114
van Buuren, A., & Edelenbos, J. (2004). Conflicting knowledge: Why is joint knowledge production such a problem? Science and Public Policy, 31(4), 289–299. Retrieved from http://repub.eur.nl/pub/1651/
van den Hove, S. (2007). A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures, 39(7), 807–826. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004
Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative government: meanings, dimensions, drivers and outcomes. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: a new era of public policy in Australia? (pp. 3–13). Acton, A.C.T: ANU E Press.
Wehrens, R., Bekker, M., & Bal, R. (2014). Hybrid Management Configurations in Joint Research. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), 6–41. doi:10.1177/0162243913497807
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morgan, E.A. (2017). The Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education Institutions at the Science–Policy Interface. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Climate Change Research at Universities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58214-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58214-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58213-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58214-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)