Abstract
In Internet of Things (IoT) environments, networks of sensors, actuators, and computing devices are responsible to locally process contextual data, reason and collaboratively support aggregation analytics tasks. We rest on the edge computing paradigm where pushing processing and inference to the edge of the IoT network allows the complexity of analytics to be distributed into many smaller and more manageable pieces and to be physically located at the source of the contextual information it needs to work on. This enables a huge amount of rich contextual data to be processed in real time that would be prohibitively complex and costly to deliver on a traditional centralized cloud/back-end processing system. We propose a lightweight, distributed, predictive intelligence mechanism that supports communication efficient aggregation analytics within the edge network. Our idea is based on the capability of the edge nodes to perform sensing and locally determine (through prediction) whether to disseminate contextual data in the edge network or to locally re-construct undelivered contextual data in light of minimizing the required communication interaction at the expense of accurate analytics tasks. Based on this decision making, we eliminate data transfer at the edge of the network, thus saving network resources for sensing and receiving data, by exploiting the nature of the captured contextual data. We provide comprehensive experimental evaluation of the proposed mechanism over a real contextual dataset and show the benefits stemmed from its adoption in edge computing environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Double exponential smoothing (Holt-Winters time series smoothing) could be adopted dealing with the same computational complexity.
References
M. Satyanarayanan et al., Edge Analytics in the Internet of Things, in IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 14, no. 2. pp. 24–31, Apr-June 2015
The mobile-edge computing initiative, http://www.etsi.org/technologies-clusters/technologies/mobile-edge-computing
I. Stojmenovic, S. Wen, The Fog computing paradigm: scenarios and security issues, in 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Warsaw, 2014, pp. 1–8
S. Yi, C. Li, Q. Li, A survey of fog computing: concepts, applications and issues, in Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Mobile Big Data, 2015, pp. 37–42
A. Vulimiri, C. Curino, P.B. Godfrey, T. Jungblut et al., WANalytics: geo-distributed analytics for a data intensive world, in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2015, pp. 1087–1092
B. Cheng, A. Papageorgiou, M. Bauer, Geelytics: enabling on-demand edge analytics over scoped data sources, in IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress). San Francisco, CA, vol. 2016, pp. 101–108, 2016
R. Ganti, F. Ye, H. Lei, Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. Commun. Mag. IEEE 49(11), 32–39 (2011)
N. Lane, E. Miluzzo, H. Lu, D. Peebles, T. Choudhury, A. Campbell, A survey of mobile phone sensing. Commun. Mag. IEEE 48(9), 140–150 (2010)
L.M. Oliveira, J.J. Rodrigues, Wireless sensor networks: a survey on environmental monitoring. J. Commun. 6(2), 143–151 (2011)
J. Kang et al. High-fidelity environmental monitoring using wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys ’13) (USA, Article 67, 2013)
A. Awang et al. RIMBAMON: a forest monitoring system using wireless sensor networks, in ICIAS 2007, pp. 1101–1106, 2007
E. Zervas et al., Multisensor data fusion for fire detection. Inf Fusion Elsevier 12(3), 1566–2535 (2011)
C. Anagnostopoulos, S. Hadjiefthymiades, K. Kolomvatsos, Accurate, dynamic, and distributed localization of phenomena for mobile sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 12, 2, Article 9 (April 2016), 59 pages (2016)
S. Nittel, A Survey of geosensor networks: advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Sensors 9, 5664–5678 (2009)
Yu. Pieter Simoens, P. Pillai Xiao, Z. Chen, K. Ha, M. Satyanarayanan, Scalable crowd-sourcing of video from mobile devices, in Proceeding of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys ’13) (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013), pp. 139–152
G. Xu et al., Applications of wireless sensor networks in marine environment monitoring: a survey. Sensors 14(9), 16932–16954 (2014)
G.W. Eidson et al., The south carolina digital Watershed: end-to-end support for realtime management of water resources, in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Innovations and Real-time Applications of Distributed Sensor Networks (IRADSN 09), vol. 2010 (USA, May 2009)
N. Nguyen et al. A real-time control using wireless sensor network for intelligent energy management system in buildings, in Proceedings of the IEEE Worskshop on Environmental Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS 10), pp. 87–92, Sept 2010
K. Kolomvatsos; C. Anagnostopoulos; S. Hadjiefthymiades, Data fusion and type-2 fuzzy inference in contextual data stream monitoring, in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–15, June 2016
S.M. McConnell, D.B. Skillicorn, A distributed approach for prediction in sensor networks, in Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining Workshop Sensor Networks, 2005
D. Tulone, S. Madden, An energy-efficient querying framework in sensor networks for detecting node similarities, in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM), 2006
S. Goel, T. Imielinski, Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: taking lessons from MPEG. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 31(5), 82–98 (2001)
A. Simonetto, G. Leus, Distributed maximum likelihood sensor network localization, in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1424–1437, 15 Mar 2014
G. Kejela, R.M. Esteves, C. Rong, Predictive Analytics of Sensor Data Using Distributed Machine Learning Techniques, pp. 626–631, 2014
R. Gemulla, E. Nijkamp, P.J. Haas, Y. Sismanis, Large-scale matrix factorization with distributed stochastic gradient descent, in Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’11) (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2011), pp. 69–77
C. Anagnostopoulos, S. Hadjiefthymiades, Advanced principal component-based compression schemes for wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 11, 1, Article 7, 34 pages (2014)
C. Anagnostopoulos, S. Hadjiefthymiades, A. Katsikis, I. Maglogiannis, Autoregressive energy-efficient context forwarding in wireless sensor networks for pervasive healthcare systems. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 18(1), 101–114 (2014)
C. Anagnostopoulos, S. Hadjiefthymiades, P. Georgas, PC3: principal component-based context compression. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 72(2), 155–170 (2012)
A. Manjeshwar, D.P. Agrawal, TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks, in Proceedings of the 15th International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS ’01) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA), p. 189
K. Papithasri, M. Babu, Efficient multihop dual data upload clustering based mobile data collection in Wireless Sensor Network, in 2016 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, pp. 1–6, 2016
H. Jiang, S. Jin, C. Wang, Prediction or not? an energy-efficient framework for clustering-based data collection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 22(6), 1064–1071 (2011). June
L. Bottou, F.E. Curtis, J. Nocedal, Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning, arXiv:1606.04838
M. Dallachiesa, G. Jacques-Silva, B. Gedik, K.-L. Wu, T. Palpanas, Sliding windows over uncertain data streams. Knowl. Inf. Syst. (2014)
K. Patroumpas, T. Sellis, Maintaining consistent results of continuous queries under diverse window specifications. Inf. Syst. 36(1), 42–61 (2011)
D.J. Abadi, D. Carney, U. Cetintemel, M. Cherniack, C. Convey, S. Lee, M. Stonebraker, N. Tatbul, S. Zdonik, Aurora: a new model and architecture for data stream management. VLDB J. 12(2), 120–139 (2003)
D.J. Abadi, Y. Ahmad, M. Balazinska, U. Cetintemel, M. Cherniack, J.-H. Hwang, W. Lindner, A.S. Maskey, A. Rasin, E. Ryvkina, N. Tatbul, Y. Xing, S. Zdonik, The design of the Borealis stream processing engine, in CIDR, Jan 2005
J. Gray, S. Chaudhuri et al., Data cube: a relational aggregation operator generalizing group-by, cross-tab, and sub totals. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 1(1), 29–53 (1997). Mar
A. Arasu, S. Babu, J. Widom, The CQL continuous query language: semantic foundations and query execution. VLDB J. 15(2), 121–142 (2006). June
K. Patroumpas, T. Sellis, Multi-granular time-based sliding windows over data streams, in 2010 17th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME), pp. 146–53, 2010
K. Patroumpas, T. Sellis, Window specification over data streams, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Trends in Database Technology (EDBT’06) (Springer, Berlin, 2006), pp. 445–464
D. Chu, A. Deshpande, J.M. Hellerstein, W. Hong, Approximate data collection in sensor networks using probabilistic models, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2006
V.P. Chowdappa, C. Botella, B. Beferull-Lozano, Distributed clustering algorithm for spatial field reconstruction in wireless sensor networks, in IEEE 81st vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), Glasgow, vol. 2015, pp. 1–6, 2015
C. Anagnostopoulos, T. Anagnostopoulos, S. Hadjiefthymiades, An adaptive data forwarding scheme for energy efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks, in 5th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems (London, 2010), pp. 396–401
J. Durbin, S. Jan Koopman, Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods (Oxford Statistical Science Series, 2012)
S. De Vito, E. Massera, M. Piga, L. Martinotto, G. Di Francia, On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an urban pollution monitoring scenario. Sens Actuators B: Chem. 129(2), 750–757, 22 Feb 2008. ISSN 0925-4005
C. Tofallis, A better measure of relative prediction accuracy for model selection and model estimation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(8), 1352–1362
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harth, N., Delakouridis, K., Anagnostopoulos, C. (2018). Convey Intelligence to Edge Aggregation Analytics. In: Yager, R., Pascual Espada, J. (eds) New Advances in the Internet of Things. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 715. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58190-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58190-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58189-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58190-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)