Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the Impact of National and State Policies on School-Based Counseling Practices and Student Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook for Policy Research on School-Based Counseling

  • 697 Accesses

Abstract

There is perhaps no other time in recent history that provides such a compelling case for the essential role of school-based counselors as today. Advocates of school-based counselors have stressed the importance of organizational structure to school-based counseling programs, a core curriculum, and program evaluation for improvement and accountability. This chapter argues for the essential role of statewide evaluation in supporting policies that promote the development and implementation of effective school-based counseling programs. The rationale is that the state often has the most leverage to bring about broad change within its borders. To this end, the chapter provides a content analysis of existing statewide evaluation studies found in the literature and assesses the evaluations against the National Leadership Cadre (2007) suggestions for statewide evaluations. Seven recommendations are provided that include (1) expansion of cost-effective, statewide evaluations; (2) use of evaluation strategies that support outcome evaluation; (3) wider use of methodological approaches and evaluation strategies; (4) deliberate evaluation of promising practices; (5) promotion of evaluation use; (6) finding ways to take advantage of existing policy research studies in promoting school-based counseling as a viable education reform tool; and (7) reaching out to the broader education policy and policy research community to argue for school-based counselors as essential personnel in the drive toward attainment of critical student outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Evaluation Association. (2004). American evaluation association guiding principles for evaluators. http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  • American School Counselor Association. (2012). The ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Z. A., & Jenness, M. (1993). Cluster evaluation: A method to strengthen evaluation in smaller programs with similar purposes. Evaluation Practice, 14, 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borders, L. D., & Drury, S. M. (1992). Comprehensive school counseling programs: A review for policymakers and practitioners. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(4), 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (2013). Editorial. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 19(3), 213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (2003). Assembly bill 722: Study of pupil personnel ratios, services, and programs. Sacramento, CA: Counseling and Student Support Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. (2016). Policy, policy research on school-based counseling in Australia. In J. C. Carey, B. Harris, S. M. Lee, & J. Mushaandja (Eds.), International handbook for policy research on school-based counseling. Zug, Switzterland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., Harrity, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2005). The development of a self-assessment instrument to measure a school district's readiness to implement the ASCA national model. Professional School Counseling, 8(5), 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2012). School counseling and student outcomes: Summary of six statewide studies. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., Harrington, K., Martin, I., & Hoffman, D. (2012). A statewide evaluation of the outcomes of the implementation of ASCA National Model school counseling programs in rural and suburban Nebraska high schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., Harrington, K., Martin, I., & Stevenson, D. (2012). A statewide evaluation of the outcomes of the implementation of ASCA national model school counseling programs in Utah high schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J., & Martin, I. (2015). A review of the major school counseling policy studies in the United States: 2000 through 2014. Research Monograph, No. 4. Amherst, MA: The Ronald H. Frederickson Center for School Counseling Outcome Research & Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahir, C. A. (2004). Supporting a nation of learners: The role of school counseling in educational reform. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimmitt, C. (2009). Why evaluation matters: Determining effective school counseling practices. Professional School Counseling, 12(6), 395–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimmitt, C., & Wilkerson, B. (2012). Comprehensive school counseling in Rhode Island: Access to services and student outcomes. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, D., & Carey, J. C. (2005). School counseling program implementation survey. Unpublished assessment instrument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuer, M. J. (2009). Commentary: Disciplined education policy research. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 101–105). New York/Routledge/Washington, D. C: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gysbers, N. C., & Moore, E. J. (1981). Improving guidance programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (1994). Developing and managing your school guidance program (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gysbers, N. C. (2006). Improving school guidance and counseling practices through effective and sustained state leadership: A response to Miller. Professional School Counseling, 9(3), 245–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrell, J. M., & Straw, R. B. (Eds.). (2002). Conducting multi-site evaluations in real world settings, New directions for evaluation, number (Vol. 94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, M., & Howell, J. (2014). Estimating causal impacts of school counselors with regression discontinuity designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(3), 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development: A report from the Institute of Education Sciences and the National Science Foundation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, R. T., Gysbers, N. C., & Sun, Y. (1997). The impact of more fully implemented guidance programs on the school experiences of high school students: A statewide evaluation study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75(4), 292–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, R. T., Gysbers, N. C., & Petroski, G. F. (2001). Helping seventh graders be safe and successful: A statewide study of the impact of comprehensive guidance and counseling programs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(3), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, R. T., Gysbers, N. C., & Kayson, M. (2006). The relationship between implementation of the Missouri comprehensive guidance program and student academic achievement. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, R. T., Gysbers, N. C., Stanley, B., & Pierce, M. E. (2012). Missouri professional school counselors: Ratios matter, especially in high-poverty schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapan, R. T., Whitcomb, S. A., & Aleman, N. M. (2012). Connecticut professional school counselors: College and career counseling services and smaller ratios benefit students. Professional School Counseling, 16(2), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I., Carey, J., & DeCoster, K. (2009). A national study of the current status of state school counseling models. Professional School Counseling, 12(5), 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I., & Carey, J. (2012). Evaluation capacity within state-level school counseling programs: A cross-case analysis. Professional School Counseling, 15(3), 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I., & Carey, J. (2014). Development of a logic model to guide evaluations of the ASCA national model for school counseling programs. The Professional Counselor, 4, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, I., & Rallis, S. (2014). Building on strengths and addressing challenges: Enhancing external school counseling program evaluation. Journal of School Counseling, 12(10), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayne, J. (2014). Issues in enhancing evaluation use. In M. L. Loud & J. Mayne (Eds.), Enhancing evaluation use: Insights from internal evaluation units (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGannon, W., Carey, J., & Dimmitt, C. (2005). The current status of school counseling outcome research. Research monograph, number 2. Amherst, MA: The Ronald H. Frederickson Center for School Counseling Outcome Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. D. (2006). How collaboration and research can affect school counseling practices: The Minnesota story. Professional School Counseling, 9(3), 238–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Leadership Cadre. (2007). A multi-level school counseling outcome evaluation model. http://www.umass.edu/schoolcounseling/NLC/page2/assets/EvaluationPaper_final.doc. Accessed 19 Feb 2015.

  • National Research Council. (2002). In R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne (Eds.), Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. E., Fox, D. G., Haslam, M., & Gardner, J. (2007). An evaluation of Utah’s comprehensive guidance program: The fourth major study of Utah’s thirteen-year program. Salt Lake City, UT: The Institute for Behavioral Research in Creativity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2002). Be careful what you wish for – You may get it: Educational research in the spotlight. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S., & Rhim, L. M. (2014). Evolution of school turnaround. In L. M. Rhim & S. Redding (Eds.), The state role in school turnaround: Emerging best practices (p. 10). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhim, L. M., & Redding, S. (Eds.). (2014). The state role in school turnaround: Emerging best practices. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rog, D. J. (2010). Designing, managing, and analyzing multisite evaluations. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 208–236). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salina, C., Girtz, S., Eppinga, J., Martinez, D., Kilian, D. B., Lozano, E., et al. (2013). All hands on deck: A comprehensive, results-driven counseling model. Professional School Counseling, 17(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R. (2000). The empirical program of quasi-experimentation. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell’s legacy (pp. 13–36). Thousand, Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sink, C. A., & Stroh, H. R. (2003). Raising achievement test scores of early elementary school students through comprehensive school counseling programs. Professional School Counseling, 6(5), 350–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sink, C. A., Akos, P., Turnbull, R. J., & Mvududu, N. (2008). An investigation of comprehensive school counseling programs and academic achievement in Washington state middle schools. Professional School Counseling, 12(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systematic school reform. In S. Furhman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and lasting (pp. 233–267). London/New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Gomez, L. M., & Mesler, L. (2009). Notes on reframing the role of organizations in policy implementation. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 409–425). New York/Routledge/Washington, D.C: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw, R. B., & Herrell, J. M. (2002). A framework for understanding and improving multisite evaluations. In J. M. Herrell & R. B. Straw (Eds.), Conducting multiple site evaluations in real world settings, New directions for evaluation, number 94. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevisan, M. S. (2000). The status of program evaluation expectations in state school counselor certification requirements. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevisan, M. S., & Walser, T. M. (2015). Evaluability assessment: Improving evaluation quality and use. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1988). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care? Evaluation Practice, 9(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiston, S. C., Tai, W. L., Rahardja, D., & Eder, K. (2011). School counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interventions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, J. S. (1979). Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, K., Pérusse, R., & Hughes, A. (2013). Comprehensive school counseling programs and student achievement outcomes: A comparative analysis of Ramp versus non-Ramp schools. Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 172–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, B. R., & Schmitz, C. C. (1997). Conceptual challenges confronting cluster evaluation. Evaluation, 3, 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. I. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Applied social research methods series, volume 34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 19(3), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

    Michael S. Trevisan

Authors
  1. Michael S. Trevisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Trevisan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Student Development, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

    John C. Carey

  2. University of Nottingham School of Education, Nottingham, United Kingdom

    Belinda Harris

  3. Department of Education, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Sang Min Lee

  4. Department of Guidance and Counselling, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria

    Oyaziwo Aluede

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

S. Trevisan, M. (2017). Evaluating the Impact of National and State Policies on School-Based Counseling Practices and Student Outcomes. In: Carey, J., Harris, B., Lee, S., Aluede, O. (eds) International Handbook for Policy Research on School-Based Counseling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58179-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation