Abstract
Graphene, the one-atom-thick sp2-hybridized carbon crystal, displays unique electronic, structural and mechanical properties, which promise a large number of interesting applications in diverse high-tech fields. Many of these applications require its functionalization, e.g., with substitution of carbon atoms or adhesion of chemical species, creation of defects, modification of structure or morphology, to open an electronic band gap to use it in electronics, or to create 3D frameworks for volumetric applications. Understanding the morphology–properties relationship is the first step to efficiently functionalize graphene. Therefore, a great theoretical effort has been recently devoted to model graphene in different conditions and with different approaches involving different levels of accuracy and resolution. Here, we review the modeling approaches to graphene systems, with a special focus on atomistic level methods, but extending our analysis onto coarser scales. We illustrate the methods by means of applications with possible potential impact.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Graphene-based Systems
- Morphology Property Relationships
- Volumetric Applications
- Perdew Burke Ernzerhof Generalized Gradient Approximation
- Gravimetric Density
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
Since its first isolation [1] and especially after the assignment of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2010 for its discovery, graphene has triggered great expectations. Most of its properties depend on the coincidence of a number of physical–chemical circumstances: three of the four valence electrons of carbon organize in three sp2-hybridized orbitals producing an exactly planar geometry, while the forth contributes to a vast electronic delocalization over the plane, giving great stability to the electronic and geometric structure of the single sheet and very weak interlayer interaction mediated only by van der Waals (vdW) forces and favoring bidimensionality. In addition, the specific geometry of in-plane bonds generates the highly symmetric honeycomb lattice, responsible for the peculiar band structure with conic geometry at the K points of the Brillouin Zone (BZ). This is responsible for the exotic electronic properties of graphene [2], such as the ultra-relativistic-like high mobility conduction and the possible existence of Majorana fermions [3].
Its—equally exceptional—mechanical properties, have received less attention. The peculiar chemistry and symmetry also brings an extremely large resistance to tensile strain especially considering its bidimensionality (Young modulus of the order of TPa [4], fivefold that of steel), coupled to very low out-of-plane (bending) rigidity κ (1–2 eV [5,6,7]) which is at least one order of magnitude smaller than that expected from materials with comparable in-plane rigidity [8]. This implies an extreme flexibility associated to strength suggesting a vast range of applications in a variety of high-tech fields [9], including those involving exposure to extreme environmental conditions, such as aero-space technologies [10]. Flexibility and bi-dimensionality also imply the existence of low-frequency quadratically dispersive acoustic phonon branches associate to out-of-plane displacement (“flexural” phonons), which can be described as traveling ripples [11] and have a main role in thermal behavior and related phenomena [12].
Many of the applications, however, require graphene morphology manipulation of some kind (see Fig. 1). Considering for instance nanoelectronics, graphene has null density of carriers at the Fermi level, therefore needing doping to be used as conductor, or band gap opening to be used as semiconductor. These properties can be obtained by escaping from the perfect infinite 2D crystal case, e.g., in multilayers or breaking the honeycomb lattice symmetry. Graphene symmetry disruption is not difficult per se, but it is difficult to achieve in a controlled fashion.
Graphene is lightweight and with a huge surface-to-mass ratio, therefore is considered potentially interesting for gas storage applications. However, it is rather inert, little reactive and with weak vdW interactions. Therefore, this class of applications requires enhancing either physical or chemical interactions. Considering for instance hydrogen storage [13] for energy applications, accurate experimental evaluations of physisorption [14] show that a limiting value for gravimetric (i.e., the relative hydrogen mass stored with respect to the mass system) density in graphene-based systems is ~1% at room temperature (5–6% at cryogenic temperatures). On the other hand, considering chemisorption one can in principle reach 6–8% gravimetric density at room temperature, but high chemi(de)sorption barriers makes the kinetic of the process very slow at room temperature [13]. Therefore, efforts are directed both to enhance physical-like interactions and to lower the kinetic barriers for chemisorption. Again, manipulation of morphology is required. As for electronics, achievement of interesting properties must proceed through rupture of the perfect graphene symmetry.
While for electronics 2-dimensionality is useful, for other applications the large surface–to-mass ratio must be declined in a 3D context. This is the case of energy storage applications, including also batteries and supercapacitors, besides hydrogen (or other gases) storage. Therefore great efforts are directed to building 3D graphene-based frameworks [15]. This involves including spacers between sheets [16] with tailored size and mechanical properties, and control their amount and distribution [17]. Building 3D networks, controlled chemical functionalization is crucial in a number of other applications [18], including biomedical ones [19].
It appears that manipulation of graphene morphology, structure, electronic properties, chemistry, and functionalization are interconnected tasks assuming a key role in all emerging graphene-related technologies (see Fig. 1). In this context, theoretical investigations and computer modeling are tools of outmost importance to study and possibly design properties of these new materials. The so-called multi-scale approach, traditionally designed and used for biomolecular systems [20], where the hierarchical organization in different length scales is more apparent, is currently being extended to materials [21]. In the cases under discussion, multi-scaling mainly involves the two basic levels of representations, namely the “ab initio” quantum chemistry (QM) level, with explicit electrons capable of describing the chemistry of the system, and the classical “molecular mechanics” (MM) representing the interatomic interactions with empirical force fields (FF). Super-atomic descriptions are also “natural” in specific cases: For instance, fullerenes were sometimes treated with a Coarse Grained sphere-of-beads model [22] similar to that used for biomolecules [23]. For the graphene sheets, conversely, a natural low-resolution representation is a 2D membrane endowed with appropriate mechanical properties [24], analogously to those used for biological membranes.
The scope of this report is to analyze the contribution of modeling to the morphing of graphene-based system for applications. Therefore, for each of the different types of morphing described, the focus is on theory and models able to better describe and predict the properties under examination. The well-known properties of perfect single-sheet graphene are also summarized in the next section to have a base for comparison for changes due to manipulation. The subsequent section describes several ways aimed at controlling the electronic properties in graphene-derived systems. The manipulation of both physical and chemical interactions of graphene is addressed in Sect. 4. Section 5 focuses on dynamical deformation of graphene. Section 6 reports a summary and conclusions.
2 Single-Sheet Suspended Graphene
The electronic and structural properties of graphene are very well known and described in a number of very good reviews [2]. The minimal unit cell of graphene (represented in blue in Fig. 2a) includes two C atoms. The eight valence electrons organize in four filled bands, whose structure was calculated with all available electronic structure methods [25]. The band structure evaluated within the Density Functional Theory (DFT) framework (PBE functional [26]) is reported in Fig. 2c (left plot). The π band crosses its empty counterpart (in red, the filled bands are in blue) at the K point, where the linear dispersion is described in terms of the Fermi velocity v F . Inclusion of many body effects show on an average relatively small corrections to the DFT picture, resulting in a renormalization of v F , whose entity is still under debate [27].
Clearly, when treating an isolated single-sheet graphene with no defects or structural deformation, the unit cell is usually the preferred choice for the model system. However, there are infinite ways of defining a graphene supercell. Larger, rotated, or differently shaped cells might be necessary in the presence of substrates or other elements breaking the symmetry of the honeycomb lattice. A selection of them is reported in Fig. 2a, while their corresponding Brillouin Zones (BZ) in Fig. 2b. The size, shape, and orientation of the BZs change accordingly. The definition of different BZs implies that the description of the band structure is cell dependent. As an example, in Fig. 2c we report the comparison of the graphene band structure evaluated in DFT-PBE in unit cell and in the 4√3 × 4√3R30 cell [26, 28] (colored in green in Fig. 2a, b), including 96 C atoms. Once the scale of energies of the two band structures are aligned, the bands of the 4√3 × 4√3R30 cell appear refolded. In order to understand the refolding, we follow for instance the band along the M-K line of the unit cell, which is fragmented in a sequence of Γ-M-Γ-M-Γ lines of the 4√3 × 4√3R30 cell, as it can be seen in Fig. 2b. The fragmentation is reported in the central plot, and the refolded empty and filled π bands are highlighted in the right band structure. Interestingly, the crossing of bands at K point is remapped onto the Γ point in the 4√3 × 4√3R30 cell, as an effect of refolding/rotation. It is also interesting to remark that, while the band representation changes, the value of physical observables should not. As a matter of fact the density of electronic states (DoS) evaluated in the two cases coincide (within numerical error) once the energy scales are aligned. This is true in particular for the two peaks at ±1.5 eV appearing where the π bands become flat (π edges).
Finally, we remark that the use of rectangular cells allows remapping the main symmetry directions along the two Cartesian directions x and y.
3 Modification of Graphene Electronic Properties
Any breaking of the graphene perfect symmetry induces changes in the electronic or transport properties. In the following we review the effects of substrates, chemical substitution/adhesion and structural modifications on the electronic properties.
3.1 B and N Substitutions and Structural Defects
Hexagonal Boron Nitride, BN, has a 2D honeycomb structure identical with that of graphene, with the two triangular sublattices occupied by B and N, respectively. The sublattice symmetry breaking induces the opening of a large band gap, estimated in ~4.5 eV within the DFT scheme (generalized gradient approximation [29]), making it the insulating material more similar to graphene. Graphene partially substituted with BN patches or strips of different configuration shows intermediate behavior and can be considered therefore semiconductor system with band gap tunable as a function of the amount and size of BN areas with respect to graphene. Independent DFT estimates [26, 29, 30] indicate that the band gap opening is roughly linear at low B/N density, and can be estimated in ~0.03–0.06 eV for 1% of substituted C atoms. In presence of excess of N or B, doping (of n-type or p-type respectively) is also present, estimated in ±0.3–0.4 eV of Fermi level shift with respect to the Dirac point for each % point of N(B) excess [31]. In this case, for given shapes of the substitution patches, mid-gap states and specific magnetic properties can also appear.
Purely structural defects in graphene such as isolated or aligned dislocations delimiting grain boundaries can also produce severe changes in the electronic structure [32]. Depending on the specific periodicity and topology, and on the relative orientation of domains, the system can display conductive behavior or band gaps with reflective transport behavior at the grain boundaries [33]. Vacancy type and Stone–Wales type defects can open band gaps on the scale of eV leading to semiconducting behavior [34] which opens to the possibility of using defects to engineer the electronic properties of graphene. Clearly, due to rupture of the regular π electronic system, structural defects of any kind also produce structural deformation and changes in local reactivity, which are discussed in Sect. 4.
3.2 Effects of the Substrate
In supported graphene, the interaction with the substrate can induce electronic properties modifications directly, or indirectly (e.g., by substrate-induced defects) or influence electronic modification due to other effects. Considering graphene grown on SiC by Si evaporation, for instance, it was early inferred by DFT studies that—for grown on the C-rich face—the substrate can enhance the effect of Al, P, N, and B substitutional doping [35]. Of all dopants, N is shown to prefer substituting the graphene upper layer, while other dopants prefer interstitial or buffer layer locations. The enhancement effect seems due to an increased stability of dopants operated by interaction with the substrate. In a model without the buffer layer [36] (whose presence is still debated when grown on the C-exposed surface) a direct effect of the substrate producing n-type doping of ~0.3–0.4 eV, was reported, very sensitive to the intercalation of passivant H atoms. This work also reports a marked sensitivity to the use of different density functionals and treatments of vdW interactions, confirming a main role of the interaction with the substrate. In the Si-exposed surface the presence of a covalently bond buffer layer was early established, and calculations with a minimalist cell show noticeable levels of doping [37].
Early calculations however, were performed in very small simulation cells, inducing strain on the graphene layers to achieve commensuration with the substrate. Subsequent calculations in larger and more relaxed supercells revealed a reduction of all the effects: on the C-rich surface, the first graphene layer becomes almost detached and recovers graphene-type metallicity, with little doping [38]. In the case of the Si-rich surface the stress can be completely relaxed only using a very large supercell [39], where doping seems to be negligible. The question is still controversial however, because experimental observations indicate a variable level of n-doping in monolayer graphene, which tends to decrease in quasi-free standing graphene (QFSG) obtained intercalating H underneath the buffer layer, depending on the amount of H, and negligible interactions of QFSG with the substrate are confirmed by DFT calculations in the fully relaxed model [40], reporting a ~5–8 meV band gap and basically no doping [41]. A more advanced theoretical analysis indicates that perturbation from the noninteracting situation and others effects (such as the appearance of specific non linearities in the bands) might be due to many body electron interactions and phonon-coupling effects not included in the standard DFT treatment [42]. Conversely, metallic substrates induce a genuine doping whose origin is ascribed to the difference in the work function and to the more or less “physical” or “chemical” interactions between graphene-metal. A systematic DFT based study shows a n-type doping for Al, Ag, Cu, and p-type for Au and Pd [43].
Effects of substrates and of defects can combine. For instance, vacancy-type defects created on QFSG are shown to strongly interact with the H coverage and induce doping and/or localized states [44] and metals intercalation (e.g., Li) produces a strong n-type doping. In addition, the procedures to induce substitutional doping, e.g., with N, often induce also vacancy type nitrogenated defects [45] (e.g., with pyridinic or pyrrolic type reconstruction), which combines and often enhances the doping and band gap opening effects, allowing in principle a fine tuning of the electronic properties of the graphene sheet [46].
3.3 Effects of Adatoms
Chemisorption of adatoms (typically H and F) is another common way to change graphene properties. Because the fully hydrogenated sheet—graphane—is an insulator [47], partially hydrogenated graphene display semiconducting properties, with band gap depending on the coverage and decoration. Decoration in strips produces the typical ribbon-like behavior [48], with gap dependent on the edge type (zigzag or armchair) and decreasing with the width of the hydrogenated strips, and therefore increasing with the H coverage. Decoration in patches produces very variable situations [49, 50] depending on the shape and connectivity of the patches, sometimes including mid-gap nondispersive states [51]. However, when experimental and DFT data are put together as a function of the H coverage, irrespective of the decoration type (Fig. 3), they seem to accumulate onto a line which was empirically fitted with an almost square root behavior (precisely, a 0.6 exponential [51]). Best adherence to the empirical curve is observed for the uniform coverage [52] or in general in experimental cases, when the coverage is likely to be more random. Cases of regular or symmetric coverage seem to bring larger dispersion from the curve. Considering the dispersion of the curve, a measurement of the band gap, e.g., with STS techniques could give an evaluation of H coverage with an error of 10–15%.
Due to its symmetry, single-layer graphene is not piezoelectric, although there are indications of its reactivity to electric fields by means of flexoelectric behavior [53, 54]. Again, the sheets functionalization with specific elements (H, F, Li, K) was shown an effective way to induce piezoelectricity: fluorination and decoration with Lithium, in particular, are shown to bring piezoelectric coefficients of the order of magnitude of those of 3D materials [55]. Piezoelectricity can also be induced creating holes with the right symmetry on the layer [56], again breaking the graphene inversion symmetry. Chemical manipulation and substitution also influences the flexoelectric properties: curvature changes induced by an external electrostatic field are enhanced in the presence of N substitutions [26] (Fig. 4).
Table 1 reports a summary of the cited DFT-based works on graphene with different morphological modifications.
In conclusion to this section, we remark that while standard DFT methods seem appropriate to evaluate the energetics and electronic properties for chemical manipulations, the effect of substrates, especially when the interaction is more physical in nature, calls into play the use of more advanced DFT schemes, involving the use of vdW corrections and evaluation of many body electronic effects.
4 Reactivity and Interactions Manipulation
From previous discussion the necessity of controlling adsorption or substitution of chemical species onto graphene emerges as a way to endow graphene with electronic and electromechanical properties of outmost interest in applications. Controlling interaction of graphene with atomic or molecular species has also a direct use in energy applications: graphene has a huge surface-to-mass ratio, therefore it would be in principle an ideal candidate not only for gas (mainly hydrogen) storage applications, but also for supercapacitors and batteries [57]. In addition, reactivity control is a key step for building 3D networks with organic interlayer spacers. In the following a selection of theoretical and simulation works on adsorption of gases (mainly hydrogen) in graphene-based systems is reported. A summary of the literature is in Table 2.
4.1 Physisorption
Taking hydrogen as a paradigmatic case for molecular interactions with graphene, one can generally separate adsorption onto graphene in two main classes, chemisorption and physisorption [13]. Physisorption occurs basically barrierless via dispersive vdW interactions in case of neutral molecules. In the case of H2, the binding energy on bare graphene is estimated around 0.01 eV [58], bringing a precise linear dependence of the gravimetric density onto the specific surface area [14] and posing a strict upper limit to the gravimetric density for physisorption onto graphene at 1–2% at room temperature. Besides the obvious strategy of working at cryogenic temperature, in several theoretical works physical interactions were shown enhanced within nanocavities produced by rippling [58], within multilayers with specific (nanometric) interlayer spacing [59, 60] or with nanosized perforations of the sheet [61].
From the methodological point of view, it is interesting to observe that these works address the problem of physisorption combining different methodologies besides DFT (see Table 2), including classical approaches based on empirical Force Fields, different types of dynamical treatment of hydrogen (QM dynamics, Monte Carlo and thermodynamic evaluation of the adsorption). This is basically due to two circumstances: first, gravimetric density evaluation must be treated at the statistical level, which requires large system and sampling methods proper to this aim. Second, the dispersive interactions are very elusive and difficult to treat with standard DFT methods. Commonly used LDA and GGA Density Functionals are based on the (semi)local representation of exchange-correlation, insufficient to address instantaneous fluctuations of the electron density. As a consequence, these functionals fail in reproducing the medium-long range behavior of interatomic interactions [62, 63], which was corrected with a number of semiempirical schemes. In addition, hydrogen, the lightest element, calls a quantum treatment of its dynamics. Because all of these circumstances make the simulation unaffordable on large systems, recursion to combination of high accuracy/high cost with lower accuracy/low cost methods in multi-scale combined approach is compulsory. Overall, however, the lesson one learns from this analysis is that cavities, convexities, porosity or in general structures enhance the physisorption at best when they are at the nanoscale (specifically ~1 nm). Therefore nanoscale structuring must be considered a guideline also in designing graphene-based 3D networks.
4.2 Manipulation of Reactivity
In contrast to physisorption, chemisorption on graphene is a barrier-driven process, requiring a change in hybridization from sp2 to sp3 [64, 65]. The barrier for atomic H is estimated around 0.3 eV, but the barrier for H2, involving dissociative chemisorption, is ~1.5 eV per atom. Once adsorbed H can hop from site to site with a barrier of ~0.75 eV [66]. These processes display slow kinetic at room temperature.
Enhancement of reactivity can be obtained by perturbing the π delocalization in several ways, which mostly superimpose to those already mentioned to manipulate the electronic structure. Structural and substitutional [67,68,69,70] defects generally constitute hot spots of reactivity. The action mechanism is usually ascribed to the presence of localized states or doping due to the defect, which are able to induce dissociation of the molecule and subsequent adsorption of the reactive radicals, resulting in a reduction of the dissociative chemisorption barrier. External electric fields were shown to act as catalysts for this process [71, 72], being able to deform the already perturbed orbitals. This effect is synergetic with that of substitutional doping [73,74,75] promising fast kinetics, large GD (6.73%) at room temperature and the possibility of using electric field for switch uptake/release of molecules.
The reactivity enhancement effect of purely structural defects is partially due to the local distortion from flatness, which induces a protruding and partial pyramidalization of a C site, favoring the sp2 to sp3 transition. In fact, significant lowering of the barriers for H2 dissociation were previously observed on nanotubes [76], while stabilization of the adsorbate was observed on corrugated graphene without defects [58, 77, 78]. This indicates that control of local curvature can induce control of graphene decoration, upload and even release, as demonstrated by a simulation showing H2 release by curvature inversion [58]. A side (but related) effect, is that the band gap also depends on mechanical deformation, therefore rippling [28] or stretching [79] could be used directly to manipulate electronic properties, and indirectly by curvature induced chemical functionalization.
Because chemisorption involves much larger energies than physisorption, in a first approximation vdW corrections to standard DFT schemes play a less important role. However, they become crucial in the approaching phase of the molecule, when different orientations and locations with respect to C atoms determine the effective reaction path and barrier for the chemisorption reaction [80,81,82].
4.3 Metal-Mediated Adsorption
Metal mediated adsorption of hydrogen is often located [83] in between chemisorption and physisorption. This interaction is specifically mediated by d orbitals in transition (e.g., Ti [84]) or heavy metals (e.g. Pd [85, 86] which also works as catalyst and dissociates the molecule producing a “spillover” effect of atomic H onto graphene), while it is often described by an “enhanced” vdW interaction for lighter metals such as Li and Ca [87]. In all cases the interaction energy is increased of at least one order of magnitude, which suggests useful applications in storage. However the problem is turned in how to control the distribution of metal onto graphene. In fact in most cases metals tend to form clusters, reducing the active surface for adsorption with respect to total mass.
Again, combination of different kinds of graphene manipulation has a key role. For instance, it was shown that inducing N-defects onto graphene before exposure to Ti can reduce the cluster size, optimizing the active surface for adsorption [88]. Combination of Li decoration, N-doping and electric field predict reversibility of hydrogenation in a DFT study [89].
Morphology manipulations have a diverse effect on the selectivity of the adsorption process of molecules on graphene, so that it can be used for gas sensor applications. Doping graphene with heteroatoms can result in a different amount of valence electrons, and usually protrusion (e.g., with Al, Si, P, S, Mn, Cr) [90, 91] from the graphene surface and creation of reactive binding sites for molecular adsorption. In general, as in the case of physisorption and more than for chemisorption, the vdW interactions have a main role, therefore the use of appropriate functional for their representation is crucial [92].
5 Dynamical Morphing
Reversibility of graphene manipulation is a key property in tasks such as hydrogen storage. Mechanical deformations are the most reversible. In fact the reversible storage using the reactivity dependence on local curvature was demonstrated in simulations [58]. Therefore, the problem is turned on how to control local curvature of the graphene sheet. One possibility is to exploit the natural curvature of supported graphene: on given substrates, such as SiC, graphene shows multi-stable patterns of curvature [93], allowing the possibility of switching between each other by changing external environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, electric fields).
However, graphene offers the unique possibility of changing the local curvature dynamically, exploiting the naturally occurring out-of-plane wave-like deformations, i.e., the flexural phonons (or acoustic z polarized branches, i.e., ZA phonons). The capability of those vibrations to detach chemisorbed hydrogen and transport and pump it though a multilayer system was demonstrated by DFT [58] and classical MD simulations based on empirical FFs [11]. Clearly, for such applications, the key issue is how to create and maintain coherent ZA phonons of specific wavelength and amplitude.
Many efforts were devoted to the calculation the phonon dispersion curves of graphene. The reason is that due to the 2d nature of this material, the vibrational properties play a crucial role on its thermal and mechanical properties. Much attention has been reserved to the ZA mode, particularly important in 2d materials as graphene [94]. Its dispersion law is parabolic, implying that these modes are the lowest energies of the spectrum, and are the easiest to be excited. The very low phonon–phonon scattering rate and the large thermal population have as a consequence that the flexural phonons give a fundamental contribution to thermal conductivity both for graphene monolayer [95] and multilayers [96]. Moreover, they are responsible of the negative thermal expansion coefficient observed in a wide temperature interval, up to an inversion temperature value, which is still controversial [94,95,96].
Among the most used computational approaches we can mention the elastic continuum model [97, 98], the first principles DFT also with Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation [99,100,101], and the molecular dynamics simulations associated with the use of empirical interatomic potentials for the interactions between carbon atoms, which allows to treat larger systems [102]. The most effective have been demonstrated the Long-range Carbon Bond-Order Potential (LCBOPII) [103] and the parameterization by Lindsay et al. [104]. of the Tersoff potential [105], which has been also used to calculate the thermal conductivity of graphene [106, 107]. Empirical interatomic potentials have been widely used also for the investigation of the mechanical and elastic properties of graphene sheets, in particular for the elastic bending modulus [108], the thickness and Young’s modulus [109, 110], also on Si-terminated SiC [111] and 6H-SiC(0001) [112]. A survey of simulation studies about dinamical properties and mechanical manipulation of graphene is reported in Table 3.
6 Conclusions and Perspectives
Morphology manipulation of graphene requires flexible experimental and modeling approaches. In particular on the modeling side, both accuracy in the representation of the phenomena, and the use of model systems very large compared to the atomic scale are required. The former calls for the use of at least DFT based schemes, most often corrected for long-range electron correlation effects to better account for specific electronic properties or for the dispersive part of vdW interaction; in specific cases the recursion to quantum mechanical treatment of nuclei is also required. On the other hand, large model systems are needed to analyze systems at the nano-micro scale with defects and functionalization, which have a low level of symmetry. The evaluation of thermodynamic properties is also often needed, requiring extensively long simulations. This is often incompatible with the high computational cost of accurate methods, therefore empirical treatment of interactions is used. In some cases the two methods, ab initio and empirical, are mixed at several levels, intrinsically (such as in the empirical vdW corrections to DFT) or explicitly.
Ab initio level currently allows addressing the 105 atoms scale (corresponding approximately to the 100 nm size in graphene) in short simulations. Considering the exponential increase of computer power ensured by Moore’s law, the μm scale can be reached in less than 10 years, while it is already feasible, in principle, using empirical approaches on computing systems with extensive parallelization.
However, as the scales feasible in simulations increase, new questions emerge on the reliability of the theories underlying the simulation. This is especially true for more empirical approaches, because the parameterization of interactions are usually tested on smaller/shorter size/time scales, but also for more ab initio approaches such as DFT, which always include some hidden level of empiricism. Other sources of “systematic” errors in modeling might arise in the algorithms used for sampling of the conformations and phase space of the system and in the large scale average or thermodynamic properties.
In conclusion, as the size of the model system increases, the comparison with measurements becomes more and more important. The sizes of experiment and of simulations tend to meet – the first coming from bottom, the second from top––at the meso-scale. This allows a direct comparison of measured observable with the corresponding evaluated quantity. Clearly this brings an advantage in the interpretation of experiments, but also a feedback on the theory, allowing creating models more adherent to reality.
References
Geim, A.K., Novoselov, K.S.: The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007)
Castro Neto, A.H., Guinea, F., Peres, N.M.R., Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K.: The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)
Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M.I., Grigorieva, I.V., Dubonos, S.V., Firsov, A.A.: Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005)
Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., Hone, J.: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887), 385 (2008)
Nicklow, R., Wakabayashi, N., Smith, H.G.: Lattice dynamics of pyrolytic graphite. Phys. Rev. B 5(12), 4951 (1972)
Kudin, K.N., Scuseria, G.E., Yakobson, B.I.: C2F, BN and C nanoshell elasticity from ab initio computations. Phys. Rev. B 64, 235406 (2001)
Fasolino, A., Los, J.H., Katsnelson, M.I.: Intrinsic ripples in graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 858–861 (2007)
Jomehzadeh, E., Afshar, M.K., Galiotis, C., Shi, X., Pugno, N.M.: Nonlinear softening and hardening nonlocal bending stiffness of an initially curved monolayer graphene. Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 56, 123–131 (2013)
Fiori, G., Bonaccorso, F., Iannaccone, G., Palacios, T., Neumaier, D., Seabaugh, A., Banerjee, S.K., Colombo, L.: Electronics based on two-dimensional materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 768–779 (2014)
Siochi, E.J.: Graphene in the sky and beyond. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 745–747 (2014)
Camiola, V.D., Farchioni, R., Pellegrini, V., Tozzini, V.: Hydrogen transport within graphene multilayers by means of flexural phonons. 2D Mater. 2(1), 014009 (2015)
De Andres, P.L., Guinea, F., Katsnelson, M.I.: Bending modes, anharmonic effects, and thermal expansion coefficient in single-layer and multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 86, 144103 (2012)
Tozzini, V., Pellegrini, V.: Prospects for hydrogen storage in graphene. PCCP 15(1), 80–89 (2013)
Klechikov, A., Mercier, G., Sharifi, T., Baburin, I.A., Seifert, G., Talyzin, A.V.: Hydrogen storage in high surface area graphene scaffolds. Chem. Commun. 51, 15280–15283 (2015)
Wang, H., Yuan, X., Zeng, G., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Jiang, Q., Gu, S.: Three dimensional graphene based materials: Synthesis and applications from energy storage and conversion to electrochemical sensor and environmental remediation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 221, 41–59 (2015)
Mercier, G., Klechikov, A., Hedenström, M., Johnels, D., Baburin, I.A., Seifert, G., Mysyk, R., Talyzin, A.V.: Porous graphene oxide/diboronic acid materials: structure and hydrogen sorption. J. Phys. Chem. C 119(49), 27179–27191 (2015)
Xia, Z., Leonardi, F., Gobbi, M., Liu, Y., Bellani, V., Liscio, A., Kovtun, A., Li, R., Feng, X., Orgiu, E., Samori, P., Treossi, E., Palermo, V.: Electrochemical Functionalization of graphene at the nanoscale with self-assembling diazonium salts. ACS Nano, Just Accepted Manuscript (2016). doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b03278
Jiang, H., Lee, P.S., Li, C.: 3D carbon based nanostructures for advanced supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 41 (2013)
Georgakilas, V., Spinato, C., Ménard-Moyon, C., Bianco, A.: Chemical functionalization of graphene for biomedical applications. In: Functionalization of Graphene. Wiley on-line library (2014). doi:10.1002/9783527672790.ch4
Tozzini, V.: Multiscale modeling of proteins. Acc. Chem. Res. 43(2), 220–230 (2010)
Camiola, V.D., Farchioni, R., Cavallucci, T., Rossi, A., Pellegrini, V., Tozzini, V.: Hydrogen storage in rippled graphene: perspectives from multi-scale simulations. Front. Mater. 2, 00003 (2015)
Akshay, S., Srikanth, B., Kumar, A., Dasmahapatra, A.K.: Coarse-grain molecular dynamics study of fullerene transport across a cell membrane. J. Chem. Phys. 143(2) (2015)
Trovato F., Tozzini, V.: Diffusion within the cytoplasm: a mesoscale model of interacting macromolecules. Biophys. J. 107(11), 2579–2591 (2015)
Jomehzadeh, E., Pugno, N.M.: Bending stiffening of graphene and other 2D materials via controlled rippling. Compos. Part B 83, 194–202 (2015)
Konschuh, S., Gmitra, M., Fabian, J.: Tight-binding theory of the spin-orbit coupling in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82, 245412 (2010)
Cavallucci, T.: Density Functional Theory simulations of the electromechanical properties of naturally corrugated epitaxial graphene. Master Thesis in Physics University of Pisa (2014)
Trevisanutto, P.E., Giorgetti, C., Reining, L., Ladisa, M., Olevano, V.: Ab initio GW many-body effects in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226405 (2008)
Rossi, A.: Corrugated graphene hydrogenation with Density Functional Theory based simulations. Master Thesis in Physics University of Pisa (2014)
Shinde, P.P., Kumar, V.: Direct band gap opening in graphene by BN doping: ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. B 84, 125401 (2011)
Panchakarla, L.S., Subrahmanyam, K.S., Saha, S.K., Govindaraj, A., Krishnamurthy, H.R., Waghmare, U.V., Rao, C.N.R.: Synthesis, structure, and properties of boron- and nitrogen- doped graphene. Adv. Mater. 21, 4726–4730 (2009)
Xu, B., Lu, Y.H., Feng, Y.P., Lin, J.Y.: Density functional theory study of BN-doped graphene superlattice: role of geometrical shape and size. J. Appl. Phys. 108, 073711 (2010)
Yazyev, O.V., Louie, S.G.: Topological defects in graphene: dislocations and grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. B 81, 195420 (2010)
Yazyev, O.V., Louie, S.G.: Electronic transport in polycrystalline graphene. Nat. Mater. 9(10), 806–809 (2010)
Appelhans, D.J., Carr, L.D., Lusk, M.T.: Embedded ribbons of graphene allotropes: an extended defect perspective. New J. Phys. 12(12), 125006 (2010)
Huang, B., Xiang, H.J., Wei, S.H.: Controlling doping in graphene through a SiC substrate: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 83(16), 161405 (2011)
Jayasekera, T., Xu, S., Kim, K.W., Nardelli, M.B.: Electronic properties of the graphene/6H-SiC (000\(\bar{1}\)) interface: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 84(3), 035442 (2011)
Varchon, F., Feng, R., Hass, J., Li, X., Nguyen, B.N., Naud, C., Mallet, P., Veuillen, J.-Y., Berger, C., Conrad, E.H., Magaud, L.: Electronic structure of epitaxial graphene layers on SiC: effect of the substrate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(12), 126805 (2007)
Deretzis, I., La Magna, A.: Single-layer metallicity and interface magnetism of epitaxial graphene on SiC (000\(\bar{1}\)). Appl. Phys. Lett. 98(2), 3113 (2011)
Kim, S., Ihm, J., Choi, H.J., Son, Y.W.: Origin of anomalous electronic structures of epitaxial graphene on silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(17), 176802 (2008)
Sforzini, J., Nemec, L., Denig, T., Stadtmüller, B., Lee, T.L., Kumpf, C., Soubatch, S., Starke, U., Rinke, P., Blum, V., Bocquet, F.C., Tautz, F.S.: Approaching truly freestanding graphene: the structure of hydrogen-intercalated graphene on 6 H−SiC (0001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(10), 106804 (2015)
Deretzis, I., La Magna, A.: Role of covalent and metallic intercalation on the electronic properties of epitaxial graphene on SiC (0001). Phys. Rev. B 84(23), 235426 (2011)
Forti, S., Emtsev, K.V., Coletti, C., Zakharov, A.A., Riedl, C., Starke, U.: Large-area homogeneous quasifree standing epitaxial graphene on SiC (0001): electronic and structural characterization. Phys. Rev. B 84(12), 125449 (2011)
Giovannetti, G., Khomyakov, P.A., Brocks, G., Karpan, V.M., Van den Brink, J., Kelly, P.J.: Doping graphene with metal contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(2), 026803 (2008)
Sławińska, J., Cerda, J.I.: The role of defects in graphene on the H-terminated SiC surface: not quasi-free-standing any more. Carbon 74, 146–152 (2014)
Jeong, H.M., Lee, J.W., Shin, W.H., Choi, Y.J., Shin, H.J., Kang, J.K., Choi, J.W.: Nitrogen-doped graphene for high-performance ultracapacitors and the importance of nitrogen-doped sites at basal planes. Nano Lett. 11(6), 2472–2477 (2011)
Fujimoto, Y., Saito, S.: Formation, stabilities, and electronic properties of nitrogen defects in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84(24), 245446 (2011)
Sofo, J.O., Chaudhari, A.S., Barber, G.D.: Graphane: a two-dimensional hydrocarbon. Phys. Rev. B 75(15), 153401 (2007)
Tozzini, V., Pellegrini, V.: Electronic structure and Peierls instability in graphene nanoribbons sculpted in graphane. Phys. Rev. B 81(11), 113404 (2010)
Goler, S., Coletti, C., Tozzini, V., Piazza, V., Mashoff, T., Beltram, F., Pellegrini, V., Heun, S.: The influence of graphene curvature on hydrogen adsorption: towards hydrogen storage devices. J. Phys. Chem. C 117(22), 11506–11513
Boukhvalov, D.W., Katsnelson, M.I., Lichtenstein, A.I.: Hydrogen on graphene: electronic structure, total energy, structural distortions and magnetism from first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 77(3), 035427 (2008)
Rossi, A., Piccinin, S., Pellegrini, V., de Gironcoli, S., Tozzini, V.: Nano-scale corrugations in graphene: a density functional theory study of structure, electronic properties and hydrogenation. J. Phys. Chem. C 119(14), 7900–7910 (2015)
Haberer, D., Vyalikh, D.V., Taioli, S., Dora, B., Farjam, M., Fink, J., Marchenko, D., Pichler, T., Ziegler, K., Simonucci, S., Dresselhaus, M.S., Knupfer, M., Büchner, B., Grüneis, A.: Tunable band gap in hydrogenated quasi-free-standing graphene. Nano Lett. 10(9), 3360–3366 (2010)
Wang, Z., Philippe, L., Elias, J.: Deflection of suspended graphene by a transverse electric field. Phys. Rev. B 81(15), 155405 (2010)
Kalinin, S.V., Meunier, V.: Electronic flexoelectricity in low-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. B 77(3), 033403 (2008)
Ong, M.T., Reed, E.J.: Engineered piezoelectricity in graphene. ACS Nano 6(2), 1387–1394 (2012)
Chandratre, S., Sharma, P.: Coaxing graphene to be piezoelectric. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(2), 023114 (2012)
Quesnel, E., Roux, F., Emieux, F., Faucherand, P., Kymakis, E., Volonakis, G., Giustino, F., Martín-García, B., Moreels, I., Gürsel, S.A., Yurtcan, A.B., Di Noto, V., Talyzin, A., Baburin, I., Tranca, D., Seifert, G., Crema, L., Speranza, G., Tozzini, V., Bondavalli, P., Pognon, G., Botas, C., Carriazo, D., Singh, G., Rojo, T., Kim, G., Yu, W., Grey C.P., Pellegrini, V.: Graphene-based technologies for energy applications, challenges and perspectives. 2D Mater. 2(3), 030204 (2015)
Tozzini, V., Pellegrini, V.: Reversible hydrogen storage by controlled buckling of graphene layers. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(51), 25523–25528 (2011)
Patchkovskii, S., John, S.T., Yurchenko, S.N., Zhechkov, L., Heine, T., Seifert, G.: Graphene nanostructures as tunable storage media for molecular hydrogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(30), 10439–10444 (2005)
Garberoglio, G., Pugno, N.M., Taioli, S.: Gas adsorption and separation in realistic and idealized frameworks of organic pillared graphene: a comparative study. J. Phys. Chem. C 119(4), 1980–1987 (2015)
Baburin, I.A., Klechikov, A., Mercier, G., Talyzin, A., Seifert, G.: Hydrogen adsorption by perforated graphene. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40(20), 6594–6599 (2015)
Pérez-Jordá, J., Becke, A.D.: A density-functional study of van der Waals forces: rare gas diatomics. Chem. Phys. Lett. 233(1), 134–137 (1995)
Kristyán, S., Pulay, P.: Can (semi) local density functional theory account for the London dispersion forces? Chem. Phys. Lett. 229(3), 175–180 (1994)
Miura, Y., Kasai, H., Diño, W., Nakanishi, H., Sugimoto, T.: First principles studies for the dissociative adsorption of H2 on graphene. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 3395–3400 (2003)
Dzhurakhalov, A.A., Peeters, F.M.: Structure and energetics of hydrogen chemisorbed on a single graphene layer to produce graphane. Carbon 49(10), 3258–3266 (2011)
Wehling, T.O., Katsnelson, M.I., Lichtenstein, A.I.: Impurities on graphene: midgap states and migration barriers. Phys. Rev. B 80(8), 085428 (2009)
Zhao, L., He, R., Rim, K.T., Schiros, T., Kim, K.S., Zhou, H., Gutiérrez, C., Chockalingam, S.P., Arguello, C.J., Pálová, L., Nordlund, D., Hybertsen, M.S., Reichman, D.R., Heinz, T.F., Kim, P., Pinczuk, A., Flynn, G.W., Pasupathy, A.N.: Visualizing individual nitrogen dopants in monolayer graphene. Science 333(6045), 999–1003 (2011)
Kim, B.H., Hong, S.J., Baek, S.J., Jeong, Y.H., Park, N., Lee, M., Lee, S.W., Park, M., Chu, S.W., Shin, H.S., Lim, J., Lee, J.C., Jun, Y., Park, Y.W.: N-type graphene induced by dissociative H2 adsorption at room temperature. Sci. Rep. 2, 690 (2012)
Gallouze, M., Kellou, A., Drir, M.: Adsorption isotherms of H2 on defected graphene: DFT and Monte Carlo studies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 5522–5530 (2016)
Seydou, M., Lassoued, K., Tielens, F., Maurel, F., Raouafi, F., Diawara, B.: A DFT-D study of hydrogen adsorption on functionalized graphene. RSC Adv. 5, 14400–14406 (2015)
Ao, Z.M., Peeters, F.M.: Electric field: a catalyst for hydrogenation of graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(25), 253106 (2010)
Shi, S., Hwang, J.-Y., Li, X., Sun, X., Lee, B.I.: Enhanced hydrogen sorption on carbonaceous sorbents under electric field. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35(2), 629–631 (2010)
Ao, Z.M., Hernández-Nieves, A.D., Peeters, F.M., Li, S.: The electric field as a novel switch for uptake/release of hydrogen for storage in nitrogen doped graphene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14(4), 1463–1467 (2012)
Ao, Z., Li, S.: Hydrogenation of graphene and hydrogen diffusion behavior on graphene/graphane interface. In: Gong, J.R. (ed.) Graphene Simulation. Intech; Chapt. 4:53–74 (2011)
Ao, Z., Li, S.: Electric field manipulated reversible hydrogen storage in graphene studied by DFT calculations. Phys. Status Solidi A 211(2), 351–356 (2014)
Costanzo, F., Silvestrelli, P.L., Ancilotto, F.: Physisorption, diffusion, and chemisorption pathways of H2 molecule on graphene and on (2,2) carbon nanotube by first principles calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1288–1294 (2012)
Gao, X., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Chan, T.L., Irle, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, S.B.: Regioselectivity control of graphene functionalization by ripples. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13(43), 19449–19453 (2011)
Boukhvalov, D.W., Katsnelson, M.I.: Enhancement of chemical activity in corrugated graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 14176–14178 (2009)
McKay, H., Wales, D.J., Jenkins, S.J., Verges, J.A., de Andres, P.L.: Hydrogen on graphene under stress: molecular dissociation and gap opening. Phys. Rev. B 81, 075425 (2010)
Boukhvalov, D.W., Katsnelson, M.I., Lichtenstein, A.I.: Hydrogen on graphene: Electronic structure, total energy, structural distortions and magnetism from first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 77(3), 035427 (2008)
Leenaerts, O., Partoens, B., Peeters, F.M.: Adsorption of H2O, NH3, CO, NO2, and NO on graphene: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B 77(12), 125416 (2008)
Wehling, T.O., Katsnelson, M.I., Lichtenstein, A.I.: Adsorbates on graphene: impurity states and electron scattering. Chem. Phys. Lett. 476(4), 125–134 (2009)
Chan, K.T., Neaton, J.B., Cohen, M.L.: First-principles study of metal adatom adsorption on graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77(23), 235430 (2008)
Takahashi, K., Isobe, S., Omori, K., Mashoff, T., Convertino, D., Miseikis, V., Coletti, C., Tozzini, V., Heun, S.: Revealing the multibonding state between hydrogen and graphene-supported Ti clusters. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 12974–12979 (2016)
Parambhath, V.B., Nagar, R., Sethupathi, K., Ramaprabhu, S.: Investigation of spillover mechanism in palladium decorated hydrogen exfoliated functionalized graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(31), 15679–15685 (2011)
Gierz, I., Riedl, C., Starke, U., Ast, C.R., Kern, K.: Atomic hole doping of graphene. Nano Lett. 8(12), 4603–4607 (2008)
Dai, J., Yuan, J., Giannozzi, P.: Gas adsorption on graphene doped with B, N, Al, and S: a theoretical study. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(23), 232105 (2009)
Mashoff, T., Convertino, D., Miseikis, V., Coletti, C., Piazza, V., Tozzini, V., Beltram, F., Heun, S.: Increasing the active surface of titanium islands on graphene by nitrogen sputtering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(8), 083901 (2015)
Lee, S., Lee, M., Chung, Y.-C.: Enhanced hydrogen storage properties under external electric fields of N-doped graphene with Li decoration. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 3243 (2013)
Dai, J., Yuan, J.: Adsorption of molecular oxygen on doped graphene: atomic, electronic, and magnetic properties. Phys. Rev. B 81(16), 165414 (2010)
Zhang, Y.H., Chen, Y.B., Zhou, K.G., Liu, C.H., Zeng, J., Zhang, H.L., Peng, Y.: Improving gas sensing properties of graphene by introducing dopants and defects: a first-principles study. Nanotechnology 20(18), 185504 (2009)
Wong, J., Yadav, S., Tam, J., Singh, C.V.: A van der Waals density functional theory comparison of metal decorated graphene systems for hydrogen adsorption. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 224301 (2014)
Cavallucci, T., Tozzini, V.: Multistable rippling of graphene on SiC: a density functional theory study. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 7670–7677 (2016)
Jiang, J.W., Wang, B.S., Wang, J.S., Park, H.S.: A review on the flexural mode of graphene: lattice dynamics, thermal conduction, thermal expansion, elasticity and nanomechanical resonance. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27(8), 083001 (2015)
Lindsay, L., Broido, D.A., Mingo, N.: Flexural phonons and thermal transport in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82(11), 115427 (2010)
Lindsay, L., Broido, D.A., Mingo, N.: Flexural phonons and thermal transport in multilayer graphene and graphite. Phys. Rev. B 83(23), 235428 (2011)
Droth, M., Burkard, G.: Acoustic phonons and spin relaxation in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 84(15), 155404 (2011)
Qian, J., Allen, M.J., Yang, Y., Dutta, M., Stroscio, M.A.: Quantized long-wavelength optical phonon modes in graphene nanoribbon in the elastic continuum model. Superlattices Microstruct. 46(6), 881–888 (2009)
Dubay, O., Kresse, G.: Accurate density functional calculations for the phonon dispersion relations of graphite layer and carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 67(3), 035401 (2003)
Mounet, N., Marzari, N.: First-principles determination of the structural, vibrational and thermodynamic properties of diamond, graphite, and derivatives. Phys. Rev. B 71(20), 205214 (2005)
Yan, J.A., Ruan, W.Y., Chou, M.Y.: Phonon dispersions and vibrational properties of monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer graphene: density-functional perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. B 77(12), 125401 (2008)
Koukaras, E.N., Kalosakas, G., Galiotis, C., Papagelis, K.: Phonon properties of graphene derived from molecular dynamics simulations. Sci. Rep. 5, 12923 (2015)
Karssemeijer, L.J., Fasolino, A.: Phonons of graphene and graphitic materials derived from the empirical potential LCBOPII. Surf. Sci. 605(17), 1611–1615 (2011)
Lindsay, L., Broido, D.A.: Optimized Tersoff and Brenner empirical potential parameters for lattice dynamics and phonon thermal transport in carbon nanotubes and graphene. Phys. Rev. B 81(20), 205441 (2010)
Tersoff, J.: Empirical interatomic potential for carbon, with applications to amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61(25), 2879 (1988)
Mortazavi, B., Rajabpour A., Ahzi S., Hadizadeh kheirkhah, A.: Non-equilibrium molecular dynamics study on the thermal and mechanical properties of graphene. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Nanostructures (ICNS4), Kish Island, I.R. Iran, p. 1255, 12–14 Mar 2012
Magnin, Y., Förster, G.D., Rabilloud, F., Calvo, F., Zappelli, A., Bichara, C.: Thermal expansion of free-standing graphene: benchmarking semi-empirical potentials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26(18), 185401 (2014)
Lu, Q., Arroyo, M., Huang, R.: Elastic bending modulus of monolayer graphene. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(10), 102002 (2009)
Huang, Y., Wu, J., Hwang, K.C.: Thickness of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 74(24), 245413 (2006)
Lu, Q., Huang, R.: Mechanical behavior of monolayer graphene by continuum and atomistic modeling. In: Simulations in Nanobiotechnology, p. 485. Taylor & Francis (2012)
Lampin, E., Priester, C., Krzeminski, C., Magaud, L.: Graphene buffer layer on Si-terminated SiC studied with an empirical interatomic potential. J. Appl. Phys. 107(10), 103514 (2010)
Tang, C., Meng, L., Xiao, H., Zhong, J.: Growth of graphene structure on 6H-SiC (0001): Molecular dynamics simulation. J. Appl. Phys. 103(6), 063505 (2008)
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge financial support by funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020: the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 657070 and the graphene Core 1, Grant Agreement No. 696656; the CINECA award ISCRAC “ElMaGRe”—HP10C6U75 M, 2015 and ISCRAC “HBG”, 2013 and PRACE “Tier0” award Pra07_1544 for resources on FERMI (IBM Blue Gene/Q@CINECA, Bologna Italy), and the CINECA staff for technical support. We gratefully thank Dr Vittorio Pellegrini and Prof P. Giannozzi for useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cavallucci, T., Kakhiani, K., Farchioni, R., Tozzini, V. (2017). Morphing Graphene-Based Systems for Applications: Perspectives from Simulations. In: Morandi, V., Ottaviano, L. (eds) GraphITA . Carbon Nanostructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58134-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58134-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58132-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58134-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)