Abstract
Both Canada and the United Kingdom have used referendums, albeit sparingly, to resolve constitutional issues, including proposals for the independence of Quebec (1980 and 1995) and Scotland (2014). The procedure was different in each case. In Scotland, the legality and procedure for the referendum was agreed by both the UK and Scottish governments and the question evaluated by an independent body and then accepted by both sides. Both sides promised to respect the result. This was not the case in Quebec. In the UK the principle that a simple majority was sufficient was accepted, which it was not in the Quebec case, partly because Quebec contains national minorities. In both cases, the question put was whether or not to accept the proposition (independence in Scotland and ‘sovereignty’ in Quebec), when opinion polls showed strong support for an intermediate position. The advantage of the Scottish option, of an agreed question, is that attention during the campaign was focused on the merits of the issue, rather than the meaning of the question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson, C., & Guillory, C. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy. American Political Science Review, 91, 66–81.
Anderson, C., & LoTempio, A. (2002). Winning, losing and political trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 335–351.
Anderson, C., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blais, A., & Gélineau, F. (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55, 425–441.
Bogdanor, V. (1981). The people and the party system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., & Stewart, M. C. (2004). Referendum voting as political choice: The case of Quebec. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 345–355.
Crick, B. (1962). In defence of politics. London: Penguin.
Donovan, T. (2014). Referendums and initiative in North America. In M. Qvortrup (Ed.), Referendums around the world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Esaiasson, P. (2011). Electoral losers revisited: How citizens react to defeat at the ballot box. Electoral Studies, 30, 102–113.
Haskell, J. (2001). Direct democracy or representative government? Dispelling the Populist Myth. Boulder: Westview Press.
Henderson, A. (2008). Satisfaction with democracy: Evidence from Westminster systems. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18(1), 3–26.
Henderson, A. (2012). Referendums and losers’ consent. Paper presented to the elections, public opinion and parties conference, Glasgow.
Leduc, L. (2002). Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 711–732.
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Qvortrup, M. (2000). Are referendums controlled and pro-hegemonic? Political Studies, 48(4), 821–826.
Tierney, S. (2009). Constitutional Referendums: A theoretical enquiry. Modern Law Review, 72(3), 360–383.
Tierney, S. (2012). Constitutional referendums: The theory and practice of republican deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henderson, A., Tierney, S. (2018). Can Referendums Foster Citizen Deliberation? The Experience of Canada and the United Kingdom. In: Keating, M., Laforest, G. (eds) Constitutional Politics and the Territorial Question in Canada and the United Kingdom. Comparative Territorial Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58074-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58074-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58073-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58074-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)