Change Management of ERP Usage

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10271)

Abstract

IS continuance usage is getting more attention recently. For both ERP vendors and organizations adopted ERP systems, intension of continuance usage is critical in change management. The purpose of this paper is to survey the current literatures and summarize the factors influencing ERP users’ behaviors. In this study, we propose a research model to predict ERP users’ continuance usage behaviors. We believe this framework will help both researchers and practitioners in ERP research, design and development.

Keywords

ERP Continuance usage Change management 

References

  1. 1.
    Gattiker, T., Goodhue, D.: Understanding the plant level costs and benefits of ERP: will the ugly duckling always turn into a swan. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hawaii (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shang, S., Seddon, P.B.: A comprehensive framework for classifying the benefits of ERP systems. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, CA (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Olson, D., Kesharewani, S.: Enterprise Information Systems: Contemporary Trends and Issues. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davenport, T.: Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76, 121–131 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly, S., Holland, C., Light, B.: Enterprise resource planning: a business approach to systems development. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, WI (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlichter, B., Kraemmergaard, P.: A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research over a decade. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 23(4), 486–520 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabski, S., Leech, S., Schmidt, P.: A review of ERP research: a future agenda for accounting information systems. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 37–78 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Staehr, L., Shanks, G., Seddon, P.: Understanding the business benefits of enterprise resource planning systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, pp. 899–905 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang, M., Cheung, W., Cheng, C., Yeung, J.: Understanding ERP system adoption from the user’s perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113, 928–942 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Amoako-Gyampah, K.: Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implantation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 1232–1248 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, M., Zound, R.: ERP usage in practice: an empirical investigation. Inf. Resour. Manage. J. 19(1), 23–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–339 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shaikh, A.A., Karjaluoto, H.: Making the most of information technology & systems usage: a literature review, framework and future research agenda. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 541–566 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 25(3), 351–370 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderson, E., Sullivan, M.: The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Market. Sci. 12(2), 125–143 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhattacherjee, A., Perols, J., Sanford, C.: Information technology continuance: a theoretic extension and empirical test. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 49(1), 17–26 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ajzen, I.: Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32(4), 665–683 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Compeau, D., Higgins, C., Huff, S.: Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Q. 23(2), 145–158 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unifying view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, W., Butler, J.E., Hsieh, J.P.A., Hsu, S.H.: Innovate with complex information technologies: a theoretical model and empirical examination. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 49(1), 27–36 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maslow, A.: A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370–396 (1943)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alderfer, C.P.: An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 4(2), 142–175 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yeh, R., Teng, T.: Extended conceptualization of perceived usefulness: empirical test in the context of information system use continuance. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31(5), 525–540 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bhattacherjee, A., Limayem, M., Cheung, C.M.: User switching of information technology: a theoretical synthesis and empirical test. Inf. Manage. 49(7), 327–333 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, J., Hong, S., Min, J., Lee, H.: Antecedents of application service continuance: a synthesis of satisfaction and trust. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9530–9542 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hong, S., Thong, J., Tam, K.: Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decis. Support Syst. 42, 1819–1834 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chen, L., Meservy, T., Gillenson, M.: Understanding information systems continuance for information-oriented mobile applications. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 30, 127–146 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karahanna, E., Straub, D.: The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Inf. Manage. 35(4), 237–250 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Debei, M.M., Al-Lozi, E., Papazafeiropoulou, A.: Why people keep coming back to Facebook: explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 55(1), 43–54 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yoon, C., Rolland, E.: Understanding continuance use in social networking services. J. CIS 55(2), 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ku, Y., Chen, R., Zhang, H.: Why do users continue using social networking sites? an exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan. Inf. Manage. 50, 571–581 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hu, T., Kettinger, W.J.: Why people continue to use social networking services: developing a comprehensive model. In: ICIS 2008 Proceedings, vol. 89 (2008)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Limayem, M., Cheung, C.M.: Understanding information systems continuance: the case of Internet-based learning technologies. Inf. Manage. 45(4), 227–232 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., Van Knippenberg, A.: Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(15), 1355–1374 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mittal, B.: Achieving higher seat-belt usage: the role of habit in bridging the attitude-behavior gap. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18(12), 993–1016 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee, M.C.: Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: an extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Comput. Educ. 54(2), 506–516 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Darban, M., Polites, G.L.: Do emotions matter in technology training? exploring their effects on individual perceptions and willingness to learn. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 644–657 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun, Y., Mouakket, S.: Assessing the impact of enterprise systems technological characteristics on user continuance behavior: an empirical study in China. Comput. Ind. 70, 153–167 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chou, S.W., Chen, P.Y.: The influence of individual differences on continuance intentions of enterprise resource planning (ERP). Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 67(6), 484–496 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Oliver, R.L.: Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. J. Consum. Res. 20(3), 418–430 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Soltani, S., Elkhani, N., Bardsiri, V.K.: The effects of perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behaviors on continuance intention of enterprise resource planning. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. (IJEIS) 10(2), 81–102 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Motwani, J., Subramanian, R., Gopalakrishna, P.: Critical factors for successful ERP implementation: exploratory findings from four case studies. Comput. Ind. 56, 529–544 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pawlowski, S., Boudreau, M.: Constraints and flexibility in enterprise systems: a dialectic of system and job. In: Proceedings of the Americans Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Milwaukee, pp. 791–793 (1999)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., Cheung, C.M.: How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Q. 31, 705–737 (2007)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Procter & GambleCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.College of BusinessFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityFort MyersUSA

Personalised recommendations