Skip to main content

Analytical Framework for a Systemic Analysis of Drivers and Dynamics of Historical Land-Use Changes: A Shift Toward Systems Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Balancing Individualism and Collectivism

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

Abstract

Drivers of land-use change processes include but are not limited to agricultural innovation and reforms, demography and policy changes, and external conservation trends. Research on land-use changes has concentrated on developing both spatially focused models and reductionist approaches. However, reductionist science has shown itself to be incapable of providing the complete and accurate information required to successfully address nature situations involving human values. This research proposes a shift towards “systems thinking” to capture the real motives behind land-use decision-making, in addition to understanding the interconnections between a given system’s elements and its dynamics in relation to the environment. The objective of this paper is to introduce an analytical framework that will assist in analysing land-use change dynamics, in addition to presenting a discussion as to why a paradigm shift towards systems thinking in land-use research is necessary. In addition, because changes occur not only spatially, but temporally, a historical approach is used to recognize this changing state. Land-use decisions are heavily influenced by drivers such as social constructions and needs, values and emotions, and the personal history of each decision-maker. Those drivers (internal to the human condition) are reflected in the individual landowner and land manager cognitive representations of reality. The framework guide the researcher in understanding individual incentives and motivations and to aggregate it at a collective level, by identifying which of these drivers contributes to the creation of a collective bond. Further efforts are required to understand all motives behind decision-making and the co-evolution of human and natural systems. To this end, the analysis of dynamics of space, time, and human choice play a crucial role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In C. West Churchman, “Wicked Problems,” Management Science, (December 1967), Vol. 4, No. 14, B-141-B142

  2. 2.

    “Land Use Functions (LUFs) are the goods and services provided by the different land uses that summarise the most relevant economic, environmental, and societal issues of a region. The LUFs framework integrates the changes observed in a large set of impact indicators into nine LUFs, which are balanced among the three pillars of sustainability (Perez-Soba et. al. 2008)

References

  • Ackoff RL (1999) Ackoff’s best: His classic writings on management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden RJ, Macadam RD, Packham RG, Valentine I (1984) Systems thinking and practices in the education of agriculturalists. Agric Syst 13:205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17:11–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1967) “Wicked Problems” management Science, vol 4, no 14, pp B-141–B142

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (2009) Learning to do historical research: a primer for environmental historians and others. http://www.williamcronon.net/researching/. Accessed 23 March 2009

  • Darnhofer ID, Gibbon BD (2012) Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Chapter 1 Farming systems research: an approach to inquiry. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht (XIII), pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairtlough G (2007) The three ways of getting things done. Hierarchy, heterarchy and responsible autonomy in organizations. Axminster, Triarchy

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldewijk KK, Ramankutty N (2004) Land use changes during the past 300 years. In: Verheye WH (ed) Land use, land cover and soil sciences in encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), vol 1. Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Huesemann M (2001) Can pollution problems be effectively solved by environmental science and technology? An analysis of critical limitations. Ecol Econ 37:271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison ED, Charlesworth LW (2008) Theoretical perspectives on human behavior. In: Hutchison E (ed) Dimensions of human behavior, 3rd edn, pp 37–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R (2008) Understandings and practices for a complex, coevolutionary systems approach. In: Proceedings of the international symposium: selected topics on complex systems engineering applied to sustainable animal production, 29–31 Oct 2008, Instituto Tecnológico del Valle de Morelia, in Morelia Michoac Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison R (2010) Systems practice: how to act in a climate change world. The Open University and Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P (2014) Eliciting mental models: a comparison of interview procedures in the context of natural resource management. Ecol Soc 19(1):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo A, Krippner S (1998) Systems theories: their origins, foundations and development. In: Scott Jordan J (eds) Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M, Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2013) Introduction to systems theory (trans: Gilgen P, Baecker D, ed). Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller H (2006) Luhmann explained: from soul to systems, vol 3. Ideas Explained Series, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2000) What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape Urban Plann 50:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, Bertrand N, Briquel V, Omodei-Zorini L, Contini C, Helming K, Farrington J, Mossello T, Wascher D, Kienast F, de Groot RS (2008) Land use functions—a new conceptual approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability through multifunctionality. In: Helming K, Tabbush P, Perez-Soba M (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use policies. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi K (2001) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time, 2nd edn. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl D (2004) “Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems. Munich Business Research Paper 2004-2. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor Jupp (ed) (2006) The SAGE dictionary of social research methods. SAGE Publications Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Coral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coral, C. (2018). Analytical Framework for a Systemic Analysis of Drivers and Dynamics of Historical Land-Use Changes: A Shift Toward Systems Thinking. In: McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N., Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (eds) Balancing Individualism and Collectivism. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58014-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics