Skip to main content

The EU ’s Concern About the Influence of Demographic Factors on Financial Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Sustainability in Public Administration

Abstract

Due to the economic and financial crisis, the international organizations, especially the EU, have pointed out the necessity of studying government financial sustainability focusing on the demographic changes in order to identify potential drivers and risk factors . Indeed, the EU explains that the birth rate and the immigrant population could help soften the negative influence of the elder population and unemployed people on financial sustainability. Based on an analysis of the Spanish local governments during a 9-year period, this chapter seeks to empirically justify the EU’s concern regarding demographic changes. Findings indicate that the dependent population and the unemployment rate are risk factors for financial sustainability. Moreover, the birth rate and immigrant population has no the significant and positive influence expected. These findings could be used as management tools in order to provide useful information to policymakers and managers for making appropriate decisions about financial sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afonso, António, and João Tovar Jalles. 2015. Fiscal Sustainability: A Panel Assessment for Advanced Economies. Applied Economics Letters 22 (11): 925–929. doi:10.1080/13504851.2014.987913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. 2015. Vertical Consolidation and Financial Sustainability: Evidence from English Local Government. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (6): 1518–1545. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond. 1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277. doi:10.2307/2297968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, Manuel, and Olympia Bover. 1995. Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29–51. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, Badi H. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 4th ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Spain. 2014. Boletín Estadístico 12/2014. Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastida, Francisco J., and Bernardino Benito. 2006. Financial Reports and Decentralization in Municipal Governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (2): 223–238. doi:10.1177/0020852306064611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastida, Francisco, and Bernardino Benito. 2010. Politics and Financial Management: A Long-Term Evaluation on Spanish Local Governments. International Journal of Critical Accounting 2 (3): 249–266. doi:10.1504/IJCA.2010.033432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastida, Francisco, María Dolores Guillamón, and Bernardino Benito. 2014. Explaining Interest Rates in Local Government Borrowing. International Public Management Journal 17 (1): 45–73. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.874257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, Bernardino, Francisco Bastida, and José A. García. 2010. Explaining Differences in Efficiency: An Application to Spanish Municipalities. Applied Economics 42 (4): 515–528. doi:10.1080/00036840701675560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, Bernardino, Cristina Vicente, and Francisco Bastida. 2015. The Impact of the Housing Bubble on the Growth of Municipal Debt: Evidence from Spain. Local Government Studies 41: 997–1016. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1048231.

  • Blundell, Richard, and Stephen Bond. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland (WCED). 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabaleiro, Roberto, Enrique Buch, and Antonio Vaamonde. 2013. Developing a Method to Assessing the Municipal Financial Health. The American Review of Public Administration 43 (July): 729–751. doi:10.1177/0275074012451523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Jered B., and Shanthi Karuppusamy. 2009. Reassessing the Link Between City Structure and Fiscal Policy: Is the Problem Poor Measures of Governmental Structure? The American Review of Public Administration 40 (2): 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Jeffrey I. 2008. State and Local Fiscal Sustainability: The Challenges. Public Administration Review 68 (October): S115–S131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Sang Ok, S.-S. Bae, S.-W. Kwon, and R. Feiock. 2010. County Limits: Policy Types and Expenditure Priorities. The American Review of Public Administration 40 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1177/0275074008328171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CICA. 2009. Public Sector Statements of Recommended Practice (SORP) 4.Indicators of Financial Condition. Toronto: CICA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2011. Local Government in Critical Times: Policies for Crisis, Recovery and a Sustainable Future, 1–152. http://www.coe.int/.

  • EC. 2006. The Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances in the European Union. European Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8th November 2011 on Requirements for Budgetary Frameworks of the Member States. Brussels: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Council Recommendation on the 2016 National Reform Programme of Spain and delivering a Council opinion on the 2016 stability programme of Spain. Brussels: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. 2012a. Fiscal Sustainability Report. Brussels: EU. doi:10.2765/19669.

  • ———. 2012b. Stability and Growth Pact. Strasbourg: EU. http://ec.europa.eu/.

  • Eurostat. 2015. Sustainable Development in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Migration and Migrant Population Statistics. In Eurostat, Statistics Explained, 1–13. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/.

  • Fundación La Caixa. 2013. Informe Anual. Memoria Sostenibilidad 2013. Barcelona: Fundación La Caixa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, Raquel, and Michael Barzelay. 2010. Public Management Policymaking in Spain: The Politics of Legislative Reform of Administrative Structures, 1991–1997. Governance 23 (2): 277–296. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01479.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GASB. 1990. Concepts Statement No. 11: Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting – Government Fund Operating Statements. Norwalk: GASB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative Focal Point Australia (GRI). 2012. Integrating Sustainability into Reporting – An Australian Public Sector Perspective. Australia, Sydney: GRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves Veiga, Linda, and Francisco José Veiga. 2007. Political Business Cycles at the Municipal Level. Public Choice 131 (1–2): 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, Shawna, and Suthathip Yaisawarng. 1990. Economies of Scope in the Provision of Local Public Services. National Tax Journal 1 (43): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillamón, María Dolores, Bernardino Benito, and Francisco Bastida. 2011. Evaluación de La Deuda Pública Local En España. Revista Española de Financiación Y Contabilidad XL 150: 251–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Christopher V. 2011. Smart Growth Policy Choice: A Resource Dependency and Local Governance Explanation. Policy Studies Journal 39 (4): 679–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honadle, Beth Walter. 2003. The States’ Role in U.S. Local Government Fiscal Crises: A Theoretical Model and Results of a National Survey. International Journal of Public Administration 26 (13): 1431–1472. doi:10.1081/PAD-120024405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFAC. 2011. Sustainability Framework 2.0. Professional Accountants as Integrators. New York: IFAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Reporting on the Long-Term Sustainability of a Public Sector Entity’s Finances. New York: IFAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Recommended Practice Guideline. Reporting on the Long-Term Sustainability of an Entity’s Finances. Toronto: IFAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements. New York: IFAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.Q. 2010. Governance, Policy Innovation, and Local Economic Development in North Carolina. Policy Studies Journal 38 (4): 679–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Cañavate, Antonio, and Pedro Hípola. 2011. Electronic Administration in Spain: From Its Beginnings to the Present. Government Information Quarterly 28 (1): 74–90. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAO. 2013. Financial Sustainability of Local Authorities, January. http://www.nao.org.uk/.

  • Navarro-Galera, Andrés, Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-Bolívar, Laura Alcaide-Muñoz, and María Deseada López-Subires. 2016. Measuring the Financial Sustainability and Its Influential Factors in Local Governments. Applied Economics 48: 3961–3975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-López, Gemma, Diego Prior, and José L. Zafra-Gómez. 2015. Rethinking New Public Management Delivery Forms and Efficiency: Long-Term Effects in Spanish Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1157–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzy, John, and Michael Toman. 2002. Making Sense of Sustainability. Resources for the Future Issue Brief (02-25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prillaman, Soledad Artiz, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2014. Taxes, Incentives, and Economic Growth: Assessing the Impact of Pro-Business Taxes on U.S. State Economies. The Journal of Politics 76 (2): 364–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, Manuel Pedro, Andrés Navarro, Laura Alcaide, and María Deseada López. 2014. Factors Influencing Local Government Financial Sustainability: An Empirical Study. Lex Localis—Journal of Local Self-Government 12 (1): 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, David. 2009. How to xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal 9 (1): 86–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáiz, María Petra. 2011. La Ley de Economía Sostenible: La Sostenibilidad Financiera Del Sector Público. Revista de Contabilidad Y Dirección 13: 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Christian, and Tomas Sjostrom. 2004. Public Debt, Migration, and Shortsighted Politicians. Journal of Public Economic Theory 6 (5): 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, Peter. 2004. Financing Local Government. Local Government Studies 30 (4): 609–623. doi:10.1080/0300393042000318012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Belinda, Trevor Wilmshurst, and Robert Clift. 2010. The Role of Accountants In Sustainability Reporting—A Local Government Study. In Sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, 1–18. Sydney: University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Canada: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafra-Gómez, José Luis, Antonio Manuel López-Hernández, and Agustín Hernandez-Bastida. 2009. Evaluating Financial Performance in Local Government: Maximizing the Benchmarking Value. International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (1): 151–167. doi:10.1177/0020852308099510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Ling. 2013. Panel Data Analysis in Public Administration: Substantive and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (2): 395–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out with the financial support from the Regional Government of Andalusia (Spain), Department of Innovation, Science and Enterprise (Research project number P11-SEJ-7700) and the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports under Grant (FPU13/05949).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Deseada López Subires .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P., López Subires, M.D., Alcaide Muñoz, L., Navarro Galera, A. (2017). The EU ’s Concern About the Influence of Demographic Factors on Financial Sustainability . In: Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (eds) Financial Sustainability in Public Administration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57962-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57962-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57961-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57962-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics