Skip to main content

The Selfie and the Face

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

To say that a selfie is a photographic self-portrait is correct but does not begin to capture the specificity of this contemporary widespread phenomenon whose inner form needs to be accounted for on, at least, two intersecting levels: (1) the logic of the selfie as a specific kind of digital image that already belongs to a “post-photographic” condition and (2) the logic of the selfie as an act/event of self-presentation that, while continuing a tradition of self-portraiture, can no longer be explained only in terms of that tradition. The analysis in this chapter is ultimately directed at an ethical dimension of the selfie practice: It is the question about the place and predicament of the face—of its humanistic meaningfulness and value—in our contemporary life-world. With the selfie, the author argues, the common paradigms for conceptualizing the visuality of the face are no longer enough for attending to the concrete setting in which the contemporary face tends to singularize itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On this matter, see, e.g., Chap. 4 by Kris Belden-Adams in this volume.

  2. 2.

    For Nicholas Mirzoeff (2016), for example , “the selfie resonates not because it is new, but because it expresses, develops, expands, and intensifies the long history of the self-portrait.”

  3. 3.

    With the selfie, the visual is typically intertwined with the textual, which calls for a separate discussion.

  4. 4.

    There are, of course, exceptions here. But these exceptions are completely supervenient on the core of the phenomenon: the face image. And, in this sense, subgenres that rework the face standard are not refutations but rather reminders of what the standard is. For an interesting example of such exception , see Paul Frosh (2015).

  5. 5.

    See Kenaan (2000) and (2014a).

  6. 6.

    In addition to Sartre , see, e.g., Levinas (2005), Derrida (1993), Nancy (2006), and Agamben (2000).

  7. 7.

    The use of the self-image as means of self-promotion has a long history of its own. On the role of Renaissance self-portraiture in creating a celebrity identity for artists such as Michelangelo, Dürer , and Titian, see Loh (2015).

  8. 8.

    This invisibility is not something outside the visible, but a dimension of the visible itself—what Merleau-Ponty (1968 [1960], 247) would call “the invisible of the visible.”

  9. 9.

    For a fascinating account of the condition of painting and the dialectics of looking at the mirror in Caravaggio, see Fried (1997). For an account of selfies that makes a point about the importance of understanding the relation of the face to mirrors , see Fausing (2014).

  10. 10.

    Both painting and photography also use a third modality of self-portraits anchored in the imaginary. The question of the imagination is one with which I shall not deal with here.

  11. 11.

    For an insightful account of the self’s relation to the camera, see Wilson (2012).

  12. 12.

    In earlier years, photography allowed similar (albeit different) results in self-depictions that involved the photographing mirrors and the images they reflect. An important subcategory of selfies continues this line of photography.

  13. 13.

    In this context, see Pommier (1998), Brilliant (1998), West (2004), Cummings (2009), and Hall (2014).

  14. 14.

    For a philosophical analysis of the question of visuality in the Narcissus myth, see Kenaan (2014b, part 1).

  15. 15.

    A key text for discussing the alterity involved in the mirror image and the self’s early sublimation of that alterity is of course Lacan’s “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience” (2007).

  16. 16.

    On Dürer’s project of self-portraiture and the self-portrait as a statement on art, see Koerner’s (1997) impressive work.

  17. 17.

    For an interesting attempt to analyze selfies as big data, see Lev Manovich’s Selfie City Project at http://selfiecity.net

  18. 18.

    On the ethical significance of the face, see, in this context, Kenaan (2014a). On the ethical dimension of images, see Kenaan (2010, 2011).

Bibliography

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. The Face. In Means Without Ends: Notes on Politics, trans. Vincenzo Binetti and Cesare Cazarino, 91–102. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilliant, Richard. 1998. The Portrait. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Laura. 2009. A Face to the World: On Self-Portrait. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1993. Memoirs of the Blind: The Self Portrait and Other Ruins. Translated by Michael Naas. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausing, Bent. 2014. SELF-MEDIA. The Self, the Face, the Media and the Selfies (Script of a keynote lecture given at the International Conference on Sensoric Image Science, Sassari July 24, 2014). Accessed January 19, 2016. https://www.academia.edu/7988938/SELF-MEDIA._The_Self_the_Face_the_Media_and_the_Selfies

  • Fried, Michael. 1997. Thoughts on Caravaggio. Critical Inquiry 24 (1): 13–56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, Paul. 2015. The Gestural Image: The Selfie, Photography Theory, and Kinesthetic Sociability. International Journal of Communication 9: 1607–1628. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3146/1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, James. 2014. The Self-Portrait. A Cultural History. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenaan, Hagi. 2000. The Philosopher and the Window. In Descartes: Reception and Disenchantment, ed. Yaron Sanderowicz and Yves Wahl, 195–208. Tel-Aviv: University Publishing Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. What Makes an Image Singular Plural? Questions to Jean-Luc Nancy. Journal of Visual Culture 9 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412909354256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Facing Images: After Levinas. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities 16 (1): 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014a. The Ethics of Visuality: Levinas and the Contemporary Gaze. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. Touching Sculpture. In Sculpture and Touch, ed. Peter Dent, 45–60. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, Joseph Leo. 1997. The Moment of Self-Portraiture in German Renaissance Art. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 2007. The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience. In Ecrits, trans. Bruce Fink. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 2005. Humanism of the Other. Translated by Nidra Poller. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, Maria. 2015. Still Lives: Death, Desire and the Portrait of the Old Master. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Followed by Working Notes. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam Webster Dictionary. n.d. Selfie. Accessed March 20, 2017. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/selfie

  • Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 2016. How to See the World: An Introduction to Images, from Self-Portraits to Selfies, Maps to Movies, and More. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2006. The Look of the Portrait. In Multiple Arts: The Muses II, trans. Simon Sparks, 220–248. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1967. The Will to Power. Edited by Walter Kaufmann and translated by Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Living Dictionaries. n.d. Selfie. Accessed September 16, 2016. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/selfie

  • Pommier, Edouard. 1998. Théories du portrait. De la Renaissance aux Lumières. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1974 [1939]. Faces. In Selected Prose. The Writings of Jean-Paul Sartre, vol. 2, 67–71. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992 [1943]. Being and Nothingness. Translated and with an introduction by Hazel E. Barnes. New York, NY: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Shearer. 2004. Self-Portraiture. In Portraiture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Dawn M. 2012. Facing the Camera: Self-portraits of Photographers as Artists. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (2): 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kenaan, H. (2018). The Selfie and the Face. In: Eckel, J., Ruchatz, J., Wirth, S. (eds) Exploring the Selfie. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57949-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics