Advertisement

Interfacing the Self: Smartphone Snaps and the Temporality of the Selfie

  • Sabine Wirth
Chapter

Abstract

Selfies have been extensively discussed as a mode of self-representation or self-exposure but little has been written about the dispositif of media usage within which selfie practices take place. This chapter therefore stresses the crucial role of the smartphone by shifting the attention to the surfaces that are used to generate selfies. Rather than considering selfies as single images, the chapter describes them as photographic interface practices and examines them as specific relations between user and technological device. The chapter highlights how the process of taking a selfie is entangled in the dispositif of smartphone user interfaces, how default settings and norms of interaction are shaping this process, and how specific types of temporality like seriality and liveness evolve from this embeddedness. Contextualizing selfie practices within the convergence of mobile photography and the history of personal computing opens up a possibility to shed new light on the question of agency in the “selfie act,” which is often reduced to the photographing subject within the debate about selfies.

Bibliography

  1. Batchen, Geoffrey. 2008. SNAPSHOTS: Art History and the Ethnographic Turn. Photographies 1 (2): 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760802284398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, Lynn. 2011. Snapshots, or: Visual Culture’s Clichés. Photographies 4 (2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2011.593922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bussolini, Jeffrey. 2010. What Is a Dispositive? Foucault Studies 10: 85–107. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i10.3120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell-Kelly, Martin, and William Aspray. 1996. Computer: A History of the Information Machine. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Ceruzzi, Paul E. 2003. A History of Modern Computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2011. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooley, Heidi Rae. 2004. It’s All about the Fit: The Hand, the Mobile Screenic Device and Tactile Vision. Journal of Visual Culture 3 (2): 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412904044797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, Elisabeth. 2013. How Selfies Became a Global Phenomenon. Theguardian.com, July 14. Accessed May 30, 2016. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/14/how-selfies-became-a-global-phenomenon
  9. van Dijck, José. 2011. Flickr and the Culture of Connectivity: Sharing Views, Experiences, Memories. Memory Studies 4 (4): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698010385215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Distelmeyer, Jan. 2013. Freiheit als Auswahl. Zur Dialektik der Verfügung computerbasierter Medien. In Paradoxalität des Medialen, ed. Jan-Henrik Möller Sternagel, Jörg Sternagel, and Lenore Hipper, 69–90. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
  11. Dubois, Philippe. 1990. L’Acte photographique et autres essais. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
  12. Emerson, Lori. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces. From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fetveit, Arild. 2013. The Ubiquity of Photography. In Throughout: Art and Culture Emerging with Ubiquitous Computing, ed. Ulrik Ekman, 89–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friedewald, Michael. 1999. Der Computer als Werkzeug und Medium. Die geistigen und technischen Wurzeln des Personal Computers. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik.Google Scholar
  15. Frosh, Paul. 2015. The Gestural Image: The Selfie, Photography Theory, and Kinesthetic Sociability. International Journal of Communication 9: 1607–1628. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3146/1388.Google Scholar
  16. Fuller, Matthew. 2005. Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Geimer, Peter. 2009. Theorien der Fotografie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
  18. Gerlitz, Carolin. 2015. Whatsapp und Snapchat. POP 4 (1): 42–46. https://doi.org/10.14361/pop-2015-0107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez Cruz, Edgar, and Eric T. Meyer. 2012. Creation and Control in the Photographic Process: iPhones and the Emerging Fifth Moment of Photography. Photographies 5 (2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2012.702123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gómez Cruz, Edgar, and Helen Thornham. 2015. Selfies Beyond Self-Representation: The (Theoretical) F(r)ictions of a Practice. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 7 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v7.28073.Google Scholar
  21. Goriunova, Olga. 2014. The Force of Digital Aesthetics. On Memes, Hacking, and Individuation. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 47: 54–75.Google Scholar
  22. Gunthert, André. 2009. L’image partagée Comment internet a changé l’économie des images [Shared Images. How the Internet Has Transformed the Image Economy]. Ètudes photographiques 24: 180–207.Google Scholar
  23. Hagen, Wolfgang. 2012. ‘Being There!’—Epistemologische Skizzen zur Smartphone-Fotografie. In Bildwerte: Visualität in der digitalen Medienkultur, ed. Gundolf S. Freyermuth and Lisa Gotto, 103–134. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  24. Hand, Martin. 2012. Ubiquitous Photography. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hookway, Branden. 2014. Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kammerer, Dietmar. 2011. Frontalansichten. Jeden Tag ein Bild von sich machen. In Public Enemies. Film zwischen Identitätsbildung und Kontrolle, ed. Winfried Pauleit, Christine Rüffert, Karl-Heinz Schmid, and Alfred Tews, 141–151. Berlin: Bertz + Fischer.Google Scholar
  27. Kay, Alan, and Adele Goldberg. 2003. Personal Dynamic Media. In The New Media Reader, ed. Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort, 393–404. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kittler, Friedrich. 1993. Es gibt keine Software. In Draculas Vermächtnis. Technische Schriften, ed. Friedrich Kittler, 225–242. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
  29. Kracauer, Siegfried. 1993. Photography. Translated by Thomas Y. Levin. Critical Inquiry 19 (3): 421–436.Google Scholar
  30. Murray, Susan. 2013. New Media and Vernacular Photography: Revisiting Flickr. In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 2nd ed., 165–182. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Murthaugh, Michael. 2008. Interaction. In Software Studies. A Lexicon, ed. Matthew Fuller, 143–148. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oxford Dictionaries. 2013. The Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year 2013 Selfie (Press Releases—Word of the Year), November 19. Accessed August 30, 2016. http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/press-releases/oxford-dictionaries-word-of-the-year-2013
  33. Palmer, Daniel. 2013. The Rhetoric of the JPEG. In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 2nd ed., 149–164. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Rettberg, Jill Walker. 2014. Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scannell, Paddy. 2000. For-Anyone-as-Someone Structures. Media, Culture & Society 22 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shanks, Michael, and Connie Svabo. 2013. Mobile-Media Photography: New Modes of Engagement. In Digital Snaps. The New Face of Photography, ed. Jonas Larsen and Mette Sandbye, 227–246. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  37. Tifentale, Alise. 2016. The Networked Camera at Work. Why Every Self-Portrait Is Not a Selfie, but Every Selfie Is a Photograph. In Riga Photography Biennial, ed. Santa Mičule, 74–83. Riga: Riga Photography Biennial.Google Scholar
  38. Twitter.com (@TheEllenShow). 2014. If Only Bradley’s Arm Was Longer. Best Photo Ever. #oscars. March 3. Accessed September 2, 2016. https://twitter.com/theellenshow/status/440322224407314432
  39. Verhoeff, Nanna. 2009. Grasping the Screen. Towards a Conceptualization of Touch, Mobility and Multiplicity. In Digital Material: Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology, ed. Marianne van den Boomen, Sybille Lammes, Ann-Sophie Lehmann, Joost Raessens, and Mirko Tobias Schäfer, 209–222. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Verhoeff, Nanna, and Heidi Rae Cooley. 2014. The Navigational Gesture: Traces and Tracings at the Mobile Touchscreen Interface. NECSUS. European Journal of Media Studies, Vol. Traces: 111–128. Accessed May 25, 2016. http://www.necsus-ejms.org/navigational-gesture-traces-tracings-mobile-touchscreen-interface
  41. Villi, Mikko. 2007. Mobile Visual Communication. Photo Messages and Camera Phone Photography. Nordicom Review 28 (1): 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2015. ‘Hey, I’m Here Right Now’: Camera Phone Photographs and Mediated Presence. Photographies 8 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2014.968937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wikipedia.org. 2016. Front-Facing Camera. Last modified April 6. Accessed May 16, 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front-facing_camera

Mediography

  1. Around the World in 360°: 3 Year Epic Selfie. 2014. YouTube.com (Alex Chacon), May 6. Accessed September 15, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTlXttQL_Yk
  2. Me: Girl Takes Pic of Herself Every Day for Three Years. 2006. YouTube.com (Ahree Lee), August 11. Accessed September 15, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55YYaJIrmzo
  3. Noah Takes a Photo of Himself Every Day for 6 Years. 2006. YouTube.com (Noah Kalina), August 28. Accessed September 15, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6B26asyGKDo
  4. The Longest Way 1.0—Walk Through China and Grow a Beard!—A Photo Every Day Timelapse. 2009. YouTube.com (Christoph Rehage), March 20. Accessed September 15, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ky6vgQfU24&feature=youtube

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Wirth
    • 1
  1. 1.Philipps-University MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations