Skip to main content

Interfacing the Self: Smartphone Snaps and the Temporality of the Selfie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Exploring the Selfie

Abstract

Selfies have been extensively discussed as a mode of self-representation or self-exposure but little has been written about the dispositif of media usage within which selfie practices take place. This chapter therefore stresses the crucial role of the smartphone by shifting the attention to the surfaces that are used to generate selfies. Rather than considering selfies as single images, the chapter describes them as photographic interface practices and examines them as specific relations between user and technological device. The chapter highlights how the process of taking a selfie is entangled in the dispositif of smartphone user interfaces, how default settings and norms of interaction are shaping this process, and how specific types of temporality like seriality and liveness evolve from this embeddedness. Contextualizing selfie practices within the convergence of mobile photography and the history of personal computing opens up a possibility to shed new light on the question of agency in the “selfie act,” which is often reduced to the photographing subject within the debate about selfies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following Foucault , the term “dispositif” describes a network of power consisting of a heterogeneous ensemble of regulatory mechanisms and practices. Within this chapter, the term “dispositif” is used primarily to highlight that computer-based media are not only technological artifacts but are always entangled in and brought about by practices. As Branden Hookway (2014, 148) points out with reference to Foucault’s notion of dispositif, every mediation can be understood as a process of setting elements into relation and context. This way of positioning can be observed quite readily in the practice of taking selfies, which is discussed in the course of this chapter. For an in-depth analysis of the problematic translations of dispositif and an overview about the use of the concept in the writings of Foucault, Deleuze , and Agamben , see Bussolini (2010).

  2. 2.

    As Martin Hand (2012) points out, the question who takes the photograph, who generates the image (is it the photographer, the artist or the camera, the apparatus ?) has been extensively debated since the very beginning of photography theory. Depending on the response to that question photography was either seen as art or mere reproduction—or as something in between these two assignments. By accentuating the artistic activity of the photographer, however, the agency of the camera and its dispositif has often been neglected (16–19).

  3. 3.

    In a more current approach, Martin Hand (2012) has also highlighted that photographs are best understood as practices (97).

  4. 4.

    As journalist Elisabeth Day (2013, n.p.) argues on Theguardian.com : “As a result, images tagged as #selfie began appearing on the photo-sharing website Flickr as early as 2004. But it was the introduction of smartphones—most crucially the iPhone 4, which came along in 2010 with a front -facing camera—that made the selfie go viral.”

  5. 5.

    One could even argue that the tension between individuation and generalization applies not only to the logic of mass media but lies at the core of the modern promise of individuality , as it is for instance conveyed in the idea of individuality through consumption.

  6. 6.

    The smartphone that is referred to here is a iPhone 4S with the operating system iOS 7.0.6. However, this is only one of many smartphones on the market, and it represents nothing more than a random choice. But the elementary range of operations described in this example might as well be conferrable to other smartphones and their default interface settings.

  7. 7.

    This differentiates the selfie from other media of self-portrayal like painting where the gaze into the mirror and the gaze towards the canvas displaying the self-portrait are separated.

  8. 8.

    For a closer look at the ubiquity of the file format JPEG as a default mode and a critical discussion of its deterministic versus democratic potential, see Palmer (2013).

  9. 9.

    A lot of these tips and tricks can be found in the many available “how-to” guides in online magazines, on blogs or platforms like YouTube.

  10. 10.

    The advertising campaign for the LG G5 smartphone can be found here: http://www.lg.com/us/mobile-phones/g5#G5Modularity

  11. 11.

    This summary refers to Geimer (2009, 125).

  12. 12.

    The banality of posing for tourist snaps has itself become a subject of photography—for example, in Martin Parr’s photographs of the “Pisa pushers ” (Berger 2011, 175–176).

  13. 13.

    See Fig. 2.9 in Chap. 2 by André Gunthert in this volume.

  14. 14.

    A good example for the fascination to witness the photographic act is the gif animation that circulated after the Oscars selfie showing the moment of the protagonists getting into “picture pose” in front of the smartphone screen.

  15. 15.

    Although a lot of selfies are not necessarily shared online and might rather be used for private communication , thus remaining invisible for uninvolved users , online social networks and platforms for sharing have been the breeding ground for the prevalence of the selfie as a genre of its own.

  16. 16.

    For a closer look at the history of photo messages and camphone photography , see Villi (2007).

  17. 17.

    Apart from the sheer ubiquitousness of cameras, it could be also discussed in more detail how digital devices like smartphones and various applications provide an aesthetic of availability that invites the user to take numerous pictures. The term “Funktionslust”—the pure joy of trying out available functions like filters , frames , text, paint functions, and all other ways to handle a photographic image—could serve as a good starting point here.

  18. 18.

    Uploaded to YouTube August 11, 2006, under the title Me: Girl takes pic of herself every day for three years.

  19. 19.

    Uploaded to YouTube August 27, 2006, under the title Noah takes a photo of himself every day for 6 years.

Bibliography

  • Batchen, Geoffrey. 2008. SNAPSHOTS: Art History and the Ethnographic Turn. Photographies 1 (2): 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760802284398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Lynn. 2011. Snapshots, or: Visual Culture’s Clichés. Photographies 4 (2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2011.593922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussolini, Jeffrey. 2010. What Is a Dispositive? Foucault Studies 10: 85–107. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i10.3120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly, Martin, and William Aspray. 1996. Computer: A History of the Information Machine. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceruzzi, Paul E. 2003. A History of Modern Computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2011. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Heidi Rae. 2004. It’s All about the Fit: The Hand, the Mobile Screenic Device and Tactile Vision. Journal of Visual Culture 3 (2): 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412904044797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Elisabeth. 2013. How Selfies Became a Global Phenomenon. Theguardian.com , July 14. Accessed May 30, 2016. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/14/how-selfies-became-a-global-phenomenon

  • van Dijck, José. 2011. Flickr and the Culture of Connectivity: Sharing Views, Experiences, Memories. Memory Studies 4 (4): 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698010385215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distelmeyer, Jan. 2013. Freiheit als Auswahl. Zur Dialektik der Verfügung computerbasierter Medien. In Paradoxalität des Medialen, ed. Jan-Henrik Möller Sternagel, Jörg Sternagel, and Lenore Hipper, 69–90. Paderborn: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Philippe. 1990. L’Acte photographique et autres essais. Paris: Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Lori. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces. From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fetveit, Arild. 2013. The Ubiquity of Photography. In Throughout: Art and Culture Emerging with Ubiquitous Computing, ed. Ulrik Ekman, 89–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedewald, Michael. 1999. Der Computer als Werkzeug und Medium. Die geistigen und technischen Wurzeln des Personal Computers. Berlin: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, Paul. 2015. The Gestural Image: The Selfie, Photography Theory, and Kinesthetic Sociability. International Journal of Communication 9: 1607–1628. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3146/1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Matthew. 2005. Media Ecologies: Materialist Energies in Art and Technoculture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geimer, Peter. 2009. Theorien der Fotografie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz, Carolin. 2015. Whatsapp und Snapchat. POP 4 (1): 42–46. https://doi.org/10.14361/pop-2015-0107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Cruz, Edgar, and Eric T. Meyer. 2012. Creation and Control in the Photographic Process: iPhones and the Emerging Fifth Moment of Photography. Photographies 5 (2): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2012.702123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Cruz, Edgar, and Helen Thornham. 2015. Selfies Beyond Self-Representation: The (Theoretical) F(r)ictions of a Practice. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 7 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v7.28073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goriunova, Olga. 2014. The Force of Digital Aesthetics. On Memes, Hacking, and Individuation. The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 47: 54–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunthert, André. 2009. L’image partagée Comment internet a changé l’économie des images [Shared Images. How the Internet Has Transformed the Image Economy]. Ètudes photographiques 24: 180–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, Wolfgang. 2012. ‘Being There!’—Epistemologische Skizzen zur Smartphone-Fotografie. In Bildwerte: Visualität in der digitalen Medienkultur, ed. Gundolf S. Freyermuth and Lisa Gotto, 103–134. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, Martin. 2012. Ubiquitous Photography. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, Branden. 2014. Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerer, Dietmar. 2011. Frontalansichten. Jeden Tag ein Bild von sich machen. In Public Enemies. Film zwischen Identitätsbildung und Kontrolle, ed. Winfried Pauleit, Christine Rüffert, Karl-Heinz Schmid, and Alfred Tews, 141–151. Berlin: Bertz + Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Alan, and Adele Goldberg. 2003. Personal Dynamic Media. In The New Media Reader, ed. Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort, 393–404. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, Friedrich. 1993. Es gibt keine Software. In Draculas Vermächtnis. Technische Schriften, ed. Friedrich Kittler, 225–242. Leipzig: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kracauer, Siegfried. 1993. Photography. Translated by Thomas Y. Levin. Critical Inquiry 19 (3): 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Susan. 2013. New Media and Vernacular Photography: Revisiting Flickr. In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 2nd ed., 165–182. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthaugh, Michael. 2008. Interaction. In Software Studies. A Lexicon, ed. Matthew Fuller, 143–148. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionaries. 2013. The Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year 2013 Selfie (Press Releases—Word of the Year), November 19. Accessed August 30, 2016. http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/press-releases/oxford-dictionaries-word-of-the-year-2013

  • Palmer, Daniel. 2013. The Rhetoric of the JPEG. In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 2nd ed., 149–164. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettberg, Jill Walker. 2014. Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, Paddy. 2000. For-Anyone-as-Someone Structures. Media, Culture & Society 22 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, Michael, and Connie Svabo. 2013. Mobile-Media Photography: New Modes of Engagement. In Digital Snaps. The New Face of Photography, ed. Jonas Larsen and Mette Sandbye, 227–246. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tifentale, Alise. 2016. The Networked Camera at Work. Why Every Self-Portrait Is Not a Selfie, but Every Selfie Is a Photograph. In Riga Photography Biennial, ed. Santa Mičule, 74–83. Riga: Riga Photography Biennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitter.com (@TheEllenShow). 2014. If Only Bradley’s Arm Was Longer. Best Photo Ever. #oscars. March 3. Accessed September 2, 2016. https://twitter.com/theellenshow/status/440322224407314432

  • Verhoeff, Nanna. 2009. Grasping the Screen. Towards a Conceptualization of Touch, Mobility and Multiplicity. In Digital Material: Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology, ed. Marianne van den Boomen, Sybille Lammes, Ann-Sophie Lehmann, Joost Raessens, and Mirko Tobias Schäfer, 209–222. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff, Nanna, and Heidi Rae Cooley. 2014. The Navigational Gesture: Traces and Tracings at the Mobile Touchscreen Interface. NECSUS. European Journal of Media Studies, Vol. Traces: 111–128. Accessed May 25, 2016. http://www.necsus-ejms.org/navigational-gesture-traces-tracings-mobile-touchscreen-interface

  • Villi, Mikko. 2007. Mobile Visual Communication. Photo Messages and Camera Phone Photography. Nordicom Review 28 (1): 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. ‘Hey, I’m Here Right Now’: Camera Phone Photographs and Mediated Presence. Photographies 8 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2014.968937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia.org. 2016. Front-Facing Camera. Last modified April 6. Accessed May 16, 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front-facing_camera

Mediography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wirth, S. (2018). Interfacing the Self: Smartphone Snaps and the Temporality of the Selfie. In: Eckel, J., Ruchatz, J., Wirth, S. (eds) Exploring the Selfie. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57949-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics