Study of Energetics in Drag-Reduced Turbulent Channel Flows

  • Davide GattiEmail author
  • Maurizio Quadrio
  • Andrea Cimarelli
  • Yosuke Hasegawa
  • Bettina Frohnapfel
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 196)


Changes in integral power budgets and scale energy fluxes as induced by certain active flow control strategies for turbulent skin-friction drag reduction are studied by performing Direct Numerical Simulation of turbulent channels. The innovative feature of the present study is that the flow is driven at Constant total Power Input (CtPI), which is a necessary enabling choice in order to meaningfully compare a reference unmanipulated flow with a modified one from the energetic standpoint. Spanwise wall oscillation and opposition control are adopted as model strategies, because of their very different control input power requirements. The global power budget show that the increase of dissipation of mean kinetic energy is not always related to drag reduction, while the preliminary analysis of the scale energy fluxes through the generalized Kolmogorov equation shows that the space- and scale properties of the scale energy source and fluxes are significantly modified in the near-wall region, while remain unaltered elsewhere.



Support through the DFG project FR2823/5-1 is gratefully acknowledged. Computing time has been provided by the comutaional resource ForHLR Phase I funded by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts, Baden-Wrttemberg and DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft).


  1. 1.
    H. Choi, P. Moin, J. Kim, Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75–110 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Cimarelli, E. De Angelis, C.M. Casciola, Paths of energy in turbulent channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 715, 436–451 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Frohnapfel, Y. Hasegawa, M. Quadrio, Money versus time: evaluation of flow control in terms of energy consumption and convenience. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 406–418 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Hasegawa, M. Quadrio, B. Frohnapfel, Numerical simulation of turbulent duct flows at constant power input. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 191–209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Luchini, M. Quadrio, A low-cost parallel implementation of direct numerical simulation of wall turbulence. J. Comp. Phys. 211(2), 551–571 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Marati, C.M. Casciola, R. Piva, Energy cascade and spatial fluxes in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 191–215 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Quadrio, B. Frohnapfel, Y. Hasegawa, Does the choice of the forcing term affect flow statistics in DNS of turbulent channel flow? Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 55, 286–293 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Quadrio, P. Ricco, Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillation. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251–271 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Ricco, C. Ottonelli, Y. Hasegawa, M. Quadrio, Changes in turbulent dissipation in a channel flow with oscillating walls. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 77–104 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Gatti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maurizio Quadrio
    • 2
  • Andrea Cimarelli
    • 3
  • Yosuke Hasegawa
    • 4
  • Bettina Frohnapfel
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Politecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
  3. 3.Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  4. 4.University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations