Abstract
The Beijing Consensus could become an alternative to Anglo-American neoliberalism, presented by some in the West as a “one-size-fit-all” model for all developing countries. That neoliberal model, dubbed by John Williamson as the Washington Consensus, turned out to be more harmful than helpful to the countries that received loans from the IMF and WBG. The Beijing Consensus, a term coined by Joshua Cooper Ramo, has created a Chinese economic miracle, lifting it to become the second largest economy in the world and over 700 million people out of poverty within less than 40 years. Contrary to some pundits in the West predicting an imminent economic collapse, the Chinese economy continues to grow at an annual average of 6.5% and contributes to over 30% of global economic growth since 2008.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moak, K. (2017). The Washington Consensus Versus The Beijing Consensus. In: Developed Nations and the Economic Impact of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57903-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57903-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57902-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57903-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)