Skip to main content

Multibeam Echosounders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Submarine Geomorphology

Part of the book series: Springer Geology ((SPRINGERGEOL))

Abstract

Multibeam echosounders have revolutionized our ability to resolve seabed geomorphology and regionally define its substrate. Using a fan of narrow acoustic beams, the slant ranges, angles and returned backscattered intensity can be employed to define the seabed elevation and infer the substrate. A corridor of data with a width proportional to the projected angular sector is acquired along a vehicle track. Before interpreting the resulting geomorphology, however, it is critical to understand the practical resolution and accuracy limitations that result from a particular system configuration. The spatial resolution of the data depend on a combination of the pulse bandwidth, the projected beam widths and their resulting spacing and stabilization. For a given configuration, the single biggest factor controlling the resulting resolution is the altitude of the platform. For surface mounted systems this results in degrading definition of morphology with depth. As multibeam systems improve, there is the potential to monitor temporal changes in submarine geomorphology. To do so, however, each survey has be positioned to a standard finer than the expected change. The total propagated uncertainty in the location of the resolved topography is a combination of the uncertainty in the position and orientation sensors and their integration as well as the bottom detection algorithm and sound speed field. When interpreting apparent change, it is critical to comprehend the realistic achievable accuracies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • De Moustier C, Kleinrock MC (1986) Bathymetric artifacts in sea beam data: how to recognize them, what causes them. J Geophys Res 91(B3):3407–3424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moustier C (1986) Beyond bathymetry: mapping acoustic backscattering from the deep sea floor with Sea Beam. JASA 79(2):316–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moustier C (1993) Signal processing for swath bathymetry and concurrent seafloor acoustic imaging. In: Moura and Louttie (eds) Acoustic signal processing for ocean exploration, pp 329–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr HK (1980) Multibeam bathymetric sonar: sea beam and hydrochart. Mar Geodesy 4(2):77–93. doi:10.1080/15210608009379375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CG, Hayes DE (1985) Quantitative methods for analyzing the roughness of the seafloor. Rev Geophys 23:1–48. doi:10.1029/RG023i001p00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox CG, Chadwick WW Jr, Embley RW (1992) Detection of changes in ridge-crest morphology using repeated multibeam sonar surveys. J Geophys Res 92(B7):11149–11162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois RE, Garrison GR (1982) Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: part I: pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions. JASA 72:896–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn MF (1970) Introducing an operational multi-beam array sonar. Int Hydrogr Rev 47(1):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin A (1998) The calibration of shallow water multibeam echo-sounding systems, M Eng. Report, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 190, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 182 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstad E, Lovik A, Minde S, Krane L, Steinset M (1985) Field performance of the benigraph high-resolution multibeam seafloor mapping system. IEEE OCEANS’85, pp 682–685. doi:10.1109/OCEANS.1985.1160138

  • Hughes Clarke JE (2003) Dynamic motion residuals in swath sonar data: ironing out the creases. Int Hydrogr Rev 4(1):6–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes Clarke JE (2012) Optimal use of multibeam technology in the study of shelf morphodynamics. IAS Special Publication # 44. Sediments, Morphology and Sedimentary Processes on Continental Shelves, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes Clarke JE, Mayer LA, Wells DE (1996) Shallow-water imaging multibeam sonars: a new tool for investigating seafloor processes in the coastal zone and on the continental shelf. Mar Geophys Res 18:607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohner F, Lunde EB (1990) Hydrographic applications of interferometric signal processing: proc. FIG XIX congress, commission 4, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Hughes Clarke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hughes Clarke, J.E. (2018). Multibeam Echosounders. In: Micallef, A., Krastel, S., Savini, A. (eds) Submarine Geomorphology. Springer Geology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57852-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics