Advertisement

Is Flew’s No True Scotsman Fallacy a True Fallacy? A Contextual Analysis

  • Robert Ian AndersonEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10257)

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss ways where context can help to explain why the No True Scotsman ‘Fallacy’ may not always be fallacious. I discuss different focus areas of context from speaker’s meaning, the syntactical position of the inserted term ‘true’, to dialectical contexts involving dialogues about classification and definition.

Keywords

Persuasive definition Fallacy Falsification Context Antony Flew The No True Scotsman Fallacy 

References

  1. Aberdein, A.: Persuasive definition. In: Tindale, C.W., Hansen, H., Sveda, E. (eds.) Proceedings of Argumentation at the Century’s Turn. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (2000)Google Scholar
  2. Aberdein, A.: Raising the tone: definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit. In: Reisch, G., Hardcastle, G. (eds.) Bullshit and Philosophy, pp. 151–169. Open Court, Chicago (2006)Google Scholar
  3. Flew, A.: Thinking About Thinking. HarperCollins, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Gover, T.: A Practical Study of Argument. Wadsworth, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  5. Guala, F.: On the nature of social kinds. In: Gallotti, M., Michaels, J. (eds.) Perspectives on Social Ontology and Social Cognition, pp. 57–68. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)Google Scholar
  6. Macagno, F., Walton, D.: The argumentative structure of persuasive definitions. Ethical Theory Moral Practice 11, 525–549 (2008a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Macagno, F., Walton, D.: Persuasive definitions: values, meanings and implicit disagreements. Informal Log. 28(3), 203–228 (2008b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Paglieri, F.: Don’t Worry, Be Gappy! On the unproblematic gappiness of alleged fallacies. In: OSSA Conference Archive, vol. 119 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. Schiappa, E.: Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning. Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale (2003)Google Scholar
  10. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stevenson, C.L.: Persuasive definitions. Mind 47, 331–350 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stevenson, C.L.: Ethics and Language. Yale University Press, New Haven (1944)Google Scholar
  13. van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P.: The contextuality of fallacies. Informal Log. 27(1), 59–67 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. van Eemeren, F.H.: In context: giving contextualisation its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation 25, 141–161 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van Rees, M.A.: Strategic maneuvering with dissociation. Argumentation 20, 473–487 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Walton, D., Macagno, F.: Reasoning from classifications and definitions. Argumentation 23, 81–107 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zarefsky, D.: Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: implications for dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation 20, 399–416 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy and TheologyUniversity of Notre Dame AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations