Abstract
This paper discusses the role of existence presuppositions and conceivability in linguistic interpretation. In particular, it is discussed evidence that the non-emptiness requirement on universally-quantified propositions might be satisfied through access to a background of knowledge concerning what might be the case in the actual world, as opposed to a background of knowledge concerning what is actually the case. The evidence discussed comes from empirical observations on the behavior of the scalar implicature mechanism. The crucial piece evidence amounts to the fact that the entailment pattern with existentially-quantified propositions, which is crucial to generate the desired inference, is established when quantifiers range over non-existing but conceivable entities, but it cannot be established when quantifiers range over non-exiting and inconceivable entities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chierchia, G.: Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the ‘logicality’ of language. Linguist. Inq. 37(4), 535–590 (2006)
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., Spector, B.: Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In: Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K., Portner, P. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol. 3, pp. 2297–2331. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2012)
Fox, D.: Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In: Sauerland, U., Stateva, P. (eds.) Presuppositions and Implicatures in Compositional Semantics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2007)
Geurts, B.: Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Heim, I.: On the projection problem for presuppositions. In: Barlow, M., Flickinger, D.P., Westcoat, M.T. (eds.) Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 249–260. Stanford Linguistic Association, Stanford University (1983)
Hirschberg, J.L.B.: A Theory of Scalar Implicature. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1985)
Horn, L.: A Natural History of Negation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)
Kratzer, A.: What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguist. Philos. 1(3), 337–355 (1977)
Lappin, S., Reinhart, T.: Presuppositional effects of strong determiners: a processing account. Linguistics 26(6), 1021–1038 (1988)
Magri, G.: A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. Nat. Lang. Semant. 17(3), 245–297 (2009)
Magri, G.: Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments. Semant. Pragmat. 4, 1–51 (2011)
Magri, G.: Two puzzles raised by oddness in conjunction. J. Semant. 33(1), 1–17 (2016)
McCall, S.: Connexive implication and the syllogism. Mind 76(303), 346–356 (1967)
Pistoia-Reda, S.: Contextual blindness in implicature computation. Nat. Lang. Semant. (2017). doi:10.1007/s11050-016-9131-6
Sauerland, U.: Implicated presuppositions. In: Steube, A. (ed.) The Discourse Potential of Underspecified Structures. Language, Context and Cognition, vol. 8, pp. 581–600 (2008)
Schlenker, P.: Maximize presupposition and Gricean reasoning. Nat. Lang. Semant. 20(4), 391–429 (2012)
Stalnaker, R.: Assertion. In: Cole, P. (ed.) Pragmatics, pp. 315–332. Academic Press, New York (1978)
Stalnaker, R.: Common ground. Linguist. Philos. 25(5), 701–721 (2002)
Strawson, P.F.: Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria 30(2), 96–118 (1964)
Von Fintel, K.: NPI licensing, Strawson entailment, and context dependency. J. Semant. 16(2), 97–148 (1999)
Von Fintel, K.: Counterfactuals in a dynamic context. Curr. Stud. Linguist. Ser. 36, 123–152 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pistoia-Reda, S. (2017). On Conceivability and Existence in Linguistic Interpretation. In: Brézillon, P., Turner, R., Penco, C. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10257. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57836-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57837-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)