Skip to main content

Continuity and Change in Decentralist Urbanisation: Exploring the Critical Potential of Contemporary Urban Theory Through the London Docklands Development Corporation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Emerging Urban Spaces

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 980 Accesses

Abstract

The task of this paper is twofold: The first is to parse out aspects of continuity and change in the decentralist urbanisation of the London Docklands Development Corporation (LDDC), through utilising an experimental methodological combination of two urban epistemologies: planetary urbanisation and assemblage urbanism . The second task, responding to the first, is to reflect on this theoretical approach and thus assess these much-debated epistemologies of the urban. To contextualise decentralism, this chapter includes a brief review of the new towns, an influential type of urbanisation, which preceded the LDDC , and of the lobbying activity of their representative organisation, the Town and Country Planning Association (TCPA) amidst the ‘crisis of the inner city’ in the 1970s and 1980s, and briefly surveys plans for Docklands from the 1970s. This history of decentralism , as a form of urban transformation, is framed in light of reification and the idea of second nature . The assemblage urbanist side of the methodology utilised by the chapter places particular focus on the retaining wall—an overlooked infrastructure that was key to the rehabilitation of both docks and rivers in East London. The chapter shows how retaining walls were subject to a perpendicular reorientation under the tenure of the LDDC, where a decentralist typology persisted within the post-industrial context. The chapter concludes that despite their political differences, the LDDC in fact came closest to realising plans for the ‘decongested’, low-density inner city advocated for by the TCPA in the 1970s, and ends with a reflection on the approach utilised and its future potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The most pressing example of a disputed historical narrative for the present chapter came during an interview with David Chesterton (2016), who disputed the LDDC’s claim to the originality of the decision to preserve the docks, and instead attributed this to their lack of funding for dockfilling. Whether this is true or not, it does not affect the more interesting point, which is the fact that relatively soon afterwards, the LDDC saw it as having been the ‘right’ decision, and it continues to be an important part of the inherited narrative of this organisation’s view of its contributions.

  2. 2.

    The Metropolitan green belt has been subsequently expanded to in fact surround many of the new towns which were formerly outside of its area. None of the major 2016 Mayoral election candidates expressed an intention to loosen green belt legislation.

  3. 3.

    It should be noted that urbanisation in France has a very different history to in the UK, and that the decentralisation of its urbanisation did not take place with quite the same generality.

  4. 4.

    Most dramatically, the Jubilee line extension, eventually opened in 1999 with a station at Canary Wharf, was planned to serve the centre of the Isle of Dogs rather than the northern location of Canary Wharf. This aspect of the DJC’s plan bore a strong resemblance to the ‘City New Town’ plan of the LDST (1973).

  5. 5.

    Similar transformations occurred in other infrastructures: for example, freight railways lines which had previously served the docks were rehabilitated and rebranded as car-free paths and as the Docklands Light Railway (DLR)—the UK’s only elevated, automated passenger rail system; a system chosen to foreground contemporaneous imaginations of high-tech urban development (Reid 1987). Similarly, a fast passenger boat service was instated along the river, an ancient infrastructure which had long been subordinated to freight traffic and which had developed a correspondingly functional imagination in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

  6. 6.

    It is important to note, however, that a policy of riverside access was at a later point asserted: by 1998, the LDDC’s Water Use Strategy (1998b: 10) stated that ‘the Corporation is committed to securing public access to the majority of the 55 miles of quaysides and to the riverside in Docklands’.

  7. 7.

    See for example LDST (1973) p. 29 (Sect. “Short Account of the Problems”) and p. 55 (Sect. “First Order Problems and Solutions”).

  8. 8.

    LDST (1973: 30): previous Comprehensive Development Areas of 1947 Town and Country Planning ministry specified 336 person/hectare (p/ha) in contrast to densities frequently between 500 and 750 p/ha in adjoining parts of the Boroughs. LDST adopts a maximum net density for public housing of between 200 and 240 p/ha.

  9. 9.

    See, for example, an article in Town & Country Planning (journal of the TCPA) by architect Tom Hancock from 1982, entitled In place of dereliction: innovation! Hancock states that he welcomed the designation of the LDDC.

References

  • Adorno T (1997) Aesthetic theory. Translated by Hullot-Kentor R. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander A (2009) Britain’s new towns: garden cities to sustainable communities. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes C, Colenutt B, Malone P (1996) London: Docklands and the state. In: Malone P (ed) City, capital and water. Routledge, London, p 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger P (2016) Landscape as infrastructure: a base primer. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet T, Joyce P (2013) Material powers: cultural studies, history and the material turn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth S (1976) An image tarnished: the new towns now new society. Periodicals archive online, Oct 14, 38, 732

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N, Madden DJ, Wachsmuth D (2011) Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City 15(2):225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N (ed) (2014) Implosions/explosions: towards a study of planetary urbanization. Jovis, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N, Schmid C (2015) Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City 19(2–3):151–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N (2017) Debating planetary urbanization: for an engaged pluralism. Working Paper, Urban Theory Lab, Harvard GSD, Summer 2017. Available at http://urbantheorylab.net/uploads/Engaged-pluralism_Brenner.pdf, Accessed 27 Nov 2017

  • Brownhill S (1990) Developing London’s Docklands: another great planning disaster?. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownill S, O’Hara G (2015) From planning to opportunism? re-examining the creation of the London Docklands Development Corporation. Plann Perspect 30(4):537–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Builder Group (1998) London Docklands: the end of the beginning. RIBA Journals, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell L (1978) Speech at TCPA AGM, Vol. 46 p. 342, 23 May 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterton D (2016) Personal interview in Isle of Dogs, London. 18 Oct 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Church A (1990) Transport and urban regeneration in London Docklands: a victim of success or a failure to plan? Cities 7(4):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane A (1999) Just another failed urban experiment? the legacy of the urban development corporations. In: Imrie R, Thomas H (eds) British urban policy: an evaluation of the urban development corporations. Sage, London, pp 246–258

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove D (1984) Social formation and symbolic landscape. Barnes & Noble Books, Totowa, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Telegraph (2011) Obituary: reg ward. 11 January. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/8253519/Reg-Ward.html, Accessed 1 Sept 2017

  • Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Docklands Consultative Committee (1988) Urban development corporations: six years in London’s Docklands

    Google Scholar 

  • Docklands Joint Committee (DJC) (1976) London Docklands strategic plan

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards B (1992) London Docklands: urban decline in an age of deregulation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (1999) Docklands. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy M (2014) The fabric of space: water, modernity, and the urban imagination. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling D (1996) Gordon cullen: visions of urban design. Academy Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock T (1982) In place of dereliction: innovation! Town and country planning, May 1982, pp 127–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart WO (1948) New town development corporations. Public Adm 26(3):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (1989) The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebbert M (1998) London: more by fortune than design. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollamby E (1982) Isle of dogs: a guide to design and development opportunities. LDDC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollamby E (1990) Docklands: London’s backyard into front yard. Docklands Forum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • LDDC—London Docklands Development Corporation (1998a) Laying the foundations for regeneration: engineering in London Docklands

    Google Scholar 

  • LDDC—London Docklands Development Corporation (1998b) Water use strategy

    Google Scholar 

  • LDST—London Dockland Study Team (1973) Docklands: redevelopment proposals for East London. A report to the Greater London Council and the Department of the Environment. R. Travers Morgan & Partners, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (2003) The urban revolution. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd PE, Mason CM (1978) Manufacturing industry in the inner city: a case study of greater Manchester. Trans Inst Br Geogr 3(1):66–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabogunje A (1993) Infrastructure: the crux of modern urban development. Urban Edge 1(3):3

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane C (2011a) Assemblage and critical urbanism. City 15(1–2):204–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane C (2011b) On context. City 15(3–4):375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin L (2016) The politics of construction: towards a theory of material articulations. Environ Plann D: Soc Space 34(5):895–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mountain D (2017) Transforming the urban? the adaptive reuse of infrastructure in the London Docklands Development Corporation. Research Dissertation submitted for the M.Sc. in Urban Studies, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R (1987) Background information on the opening of the Docklands Light Railway, London on 30 July 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (2002) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone A (2011) The surfacing of urban life. City 15(3–4):355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja E (2011) Postmodern geographies. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • TCPA—Town and Country Planning Association (1977) Inner cities of tomorrow: policy statement

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker D (1982) The architecture and planning of milton keynes. Architectural Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver T (2015) Blazing the neoliberal trail: urban political development in the United States and the United Kingdom. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener M (1981) English culture and the decline of the industrial spirit: 1850–1980. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Mountain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mountain, D. (2018). Continuity and Change in Decentralist Urbanisation: Exploring the Critical Potential of Contemporary Urban Theory Through the London Docklands Development Corporation. In: Horn, P., Alfaro d'Alencon, P., Duarte Cardoso, A. (eds) Emerging Urban Spaces. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57816-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics