Abstract
Risk communication is a central key for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Disaster Risk Management (DRM). While a number of strategies of risk communication are focused on confronting and responding to disaster events, there is an increasing need to establish schemes or initiatives dealing with prevention and disaster risk reduction. In this paper, the significance of effective landslide risk communication is highlighted by looking at four specific elements. On one hand, it is argued that risk perception analysis should be a requirement for any strategy to communicate risk, as awareness, preparedness, knowledge, experience, trust, and other multi-factorial aspects of social, economic, cultural, political and institutional character influence decision-making and behavior at both individual and collective levels. On the other, and in addition to the particular targets specified by each program or initiative, understanding disaster risk should be a baseline for shaping any tactic or approach aiming at communicating risk. Likewise, regardless of the structure, the specific purposes and means selected for risk communication, a critical and intentional line of information exchange and knowledge sharing should be permanently offered to favor a social and institutional behavior on which avoidance of the creation of new risks is an imperative. Finally, the idea of incorporating an observer or advisor into the risk communication process to foresee potential obstacles or requirements associated with the appropriate understanding of disaster risk, and the need to avoid the construction of new risks, in addition to other particular objectives linked to the specific scheme per se, is also pointed out.
References
Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker D, Briceño S, Cutter S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Ismail-Zadeh A, Jiménez Díaz V, Johnston D, McBean G, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen R, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi G, Vogel C, Wu G and Zhai P (2015) Disaster Risks Research and Assessment to Promote Risk Reduction and Management. In: Ismail-Zadeh A, and Cutter S (eds) ICSU-ISSC Ad Hoc Group on Disaster Risk Assessment. ICSU, Paris, March 12, 2015. Available at: http://www.icsu.org/science-for-policy/disaster-risk/documents/DRRsynthesisPaper_2015.pdf
Alcántara-Ayala I (2016) On the multi-dimensions of integrated research on landslide disaster risk. In: Aversa S, Cascini L, Picarelli L, and Scavia C (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes. Experience, theory and practice, CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, The Netherlands
Anderson JA (1987) Communication research: issues and methods. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
Árvai J, Rivers L III (2014) Effective risk communication. Earthscan, London
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, New York
Bostrom A, Lofstedt RE (2003) Communicating risk: wireless and hardwired. Risk Anal 23(2):241–248
DeVito JA (1986) The communication handbook: a dictionary. Harper & Row, New York
Fischhoff B (2013) The sciences of science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(Supplement 3):14033
Haimes Y (2004) Risk modeling, assessment, and management, 2nd revised edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Hernández-Moreno G, Alcántara-Ayala I (online) Landslide risk perception in Mexico: a research gate into public awareness and knowledge. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-016-0683-9 (in press)
Höppner C, Buchecker M, Bründl M (2010) Risk communication and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP5 report. WSL, Birmensdorf. Available via: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results. Accessed 03.06.16
Kasperson RE (2014) Four questions for risk communication. J Risk Res 17(10):1233–1239
National Research Council (1989) Improving risk communication. Committee on Risk Perception and Communication, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, USA
Oliver-Smith A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Burton I, Lavell A (2016) Forensic investigations of disasters (FORIN): a conceptual framework and guide to research. (IRDR FORIN Publication No. 2). Integrated research on disaster risk, ICSU, Beijing, 56 pp
Renn O, Levine D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJ (eds) Communicating risks to the public. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Sandman PM (2012) Responding to community outrage: strategies for effective risk communication. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax. http://psandman.com/media/RespondingtoCommunityOutrage.pdf
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:623–656
UNISDR (2009) Terminology on disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf
UNISDR (2016) Working text on terminology. The second session of the open-ended inter-governmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction, Geneva. 10–11 Feb
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I (2011) Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge, New York
Acknowledgements
Special thanks are due to CONA-CyT for the financial support kindly provided through the research project 156242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2018). TXT-tool 4.052-1.2: Landslide Risk Communication. In: Sassa, K., Tiwari, B., Liu, KF., McSaveney, M., Strom, A., Setiawan, H. (eds) Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57776-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57777-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)