Skip to main content

TXT-tool 4.052-1.2: Landslide Risk Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools

Abstract

Risk communication is a central key for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Disaster Risk Management (DRM). While a number of strategies of risk communication are focused on confronting and responding to disaster events, there is an increasing need to establish schemes or initiatives dealing with prevention and disaster risk reduction. In this paper, the significance of effective landslide risk communication is highlighted by looking at four specific elements. On one hand, it is argued that risk perception analysis should be a requirement for any strategy to communicate risk, as awareness, preparedness, knowledge, experience, trust, and other multi-factorial aspects of social, economic, cultural, political and institutional character influence decision-making and behavior at both individual and collective levels. On the other, and in addition to the particular targets specified by each program or initiative, understanding disaster risk should be a baseline for shaping any tactic or approach aiming at communicating risk. Likewise, regardless of the structure, the specific purposes and means selected for risk communication, a critical and intentional line of information exchange and knowledge sharing should be permanently offered to favor a social and institutional behavior on which avoidance of the creation of new risks is an imperative. Finally, the idea of incorporating an observer or advisor into the risk communication process to foresee potential obstacles or requirements associated with the appropriate understanding of disaster risk, and the need to avoid the construction of new risks, in addition to other particular objectives linked to the specific scheme per se, is also pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker D, Briceño S, Cutter S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Ismail-Zadeh A, Jiménez Díaz V, Johnston D, McBean G, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen R, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi G, Vogel C, Wu G and Zhai P (2015) Disaster Risks Research and Assessment to Promote Risk Reduction and Management. In: Ismail-Zadeh A, and Cutter S (eds) ICSU-ISSC Ad Hoc Group on Disaster Risk Assessment. ICSU, Paris, March 12, 2015. Available at: http://www.icsu.org/science-for-policy/disaster-risk/documents/DRRsynthesisPaper_2015.pdf

  • Alcántara-Ayala I (2016) On the multi-dimensions of integrated research on landslide disaster risk. In: Aversa S, Cascini L, Picarelli L, and Scavia C (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes. Experience, theory and practice, CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor & Francis Group, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JA (1987) Communication research: issues and methods. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Árvai J, Rivers L III (2014) Effective risk communication. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom A, Lofstedt RE (2003) Communicating risk: wireless and hardwired. Risk Anal 23(2):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVito JA (1986) The communication handbook: a dictionary. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B (2013) The sciences of science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(Supplement 3):14033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes Y (2004) Risk modeling, assessment, and management, 2nd revised edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Moreno G, Alcántara-Ayala I (online) Landslide risk perception in Mexico: a research gate into public awareness and knowledge. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-016-0683-9 (in press)

  • Höppner C, Buchecker M, Bründl M (2010) Risk communication and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP5 report. WSL, Birmensdorf. Available via: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results. Accessed 03.06.16

  • Kasperson RE (2014) Four questions for risk communication. J Risk Res 17(10):1233–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1989) Improving risk communication. Committee on Risk Perception and Communication, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Burton I, Lavell A (2016) Forensic investigations of disasters (FORIN): a conceptual framework and guide to research. (IRDR FORIN Publication No. 2). Integrated research on disaster risk, ICSU, Beijing, 56 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Levine D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJ (eds) Communicating risks to the public. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandman PM (2012) Responding to community outrage: strategies for effective risk communication. American Industrial Hygiene Association, Fairfax. http://psandman.com/media/RespondingtoCommunityOutrage.pdf

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:623–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2009) Terminology on disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf

  • UNISDR (2016) Working text on terminology. The second session of the open-ended inter-governmental expert working group on indicators and terminology relating to disaster risk reduction, Geneva. 10–11 Feb

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I (2011) Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks are due to CONA-CyT for the financial support kindly provided through the research project 156242.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irasema Alcántara-Ayala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2018). TXT-tool 4.052-1.2: Landslide Risk Communication. In: Sassa, K., Tiwari, B., Liu, KF., McSaveney, M., Strom, A., Setiawan, H. (eds) Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics