Abstract
Prediction of landslide movements with practical application for landslide risk mitigation is a challenge for scientists. This study presents a methodology for prediction of landslide movements using random forests, a machine learning algorithm based on regression trees. The prediction method was established based on a time series consisting of 2 years of data on landslide movement, groundwater level and precipitation gathered from the Kostanjek landslide monitoring system and nearby meteorological stations in Zagreb (Croatia). Because of complex relations between precipitations and groundwater levels, the process of landslide movement prediction is divided into two separate models: (1) model for prediction of groundwater levels from precipitation data; and (2) model for prediction of landslide movements from groundwater level data. In a groundwater level prediction model, 75 parameters were used as predictors, calculated from precipitation and evapotranspiration data. In the landslide movement prediction model, 10 parameters calculated from groundwater level data were used as predictors. Model validation was performed through the prediction of groundwater levels and prediction of landslide movements for the periods from 10 to 90 days. The validation results show the capability of the model to predict the evolution of daily displacements, from predicted variations of groundwater levels, for the period up to 30 days. Practical contributions of the developed method include the possibility of automated predictions, updated and improved on daily basis, which would be an important source of information for decisions related to crisis management in the case of risky landslide movements.
References
Baird KJ, Maddock T III (2005) Simulating riparian evapotranspiration: a new methodology and application for groundwater models. J Hydrol 312(1–4):176–190. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.014
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32
Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5:853–862
Calvello M, Cascini L, Sorbino G (2008) A numerical procedure for predicting rainfall-induced movements of active landslides along pre-existing slip surfaces. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(4):327–351. doi:10.1002/nag.624
Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A (2006) An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning, pp 161–168. doi:10.1145/1143844.1143865
Cascini L, Calvello M, Grimaldi G (2010) Groundwater modeling for the analysis of active slow-moving landslides. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(9):1220–1230
Catani F, Lagomarsino D, Segoni S, Tofani V (2013) Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2815–2831. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013
Chen X-W, Liu M (2005) Prediction of protein-protein interactions using random decision forest framework. Bioinformatics 21(24):4394–4400
Corominas J, Moya J, Ledesma A, Lloret A, Gili JA (2005) Prediction of ground displacements and velocities from groundwater level changes at the Vallcebre landslide (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Landslides 2:83–96
Crosta GB, Agliardi F (2003) Failure forecast for large rock slide by surface displacement measurements. Can Geotech J 40(1):176–191
Crosta G, Di Prisco C (1999) On slope instability induced by seepage erosion. Can Geotech J 36:1056–1073
Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslide investigation and mitigation (Special Report/ Transportation Research Board, National Research Council; 247). National Academy Press, Washington DC, Chapter 3, pp 36–75
Díaz-Uriarte R, de Andrés SA (2006) Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 7:1471–2105
Federico A, Popescu M, Elia G, Fidelibus C, Internò G, Murianni A (2012) Prediction of time to slope failure: a general framework. Environ Earth Sci 66:245–256. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1231-5
Fukuzono T (1985) A new method for predicting the failure time of a slope. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference and field workshop on landslides, Tokyo (Japan), pp 145–150
Gajić-Čapka M, Zaninović K (2008) Climate of Croatia. In: Zaninović K (ed) Climate atlas of Croatia, 1961–1990 and 1971–2000. Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service, Zagreb, pp 15–17
Ghiassian H, Ghareh S (2008) Stability of sandy slopes under seepage conditions. Landslides 5:397–406. doi:10.1007/s10346-008-0132-5
Gislason PO, Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR (2006) Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(4):294–300
Godt JW, Baum RL, Lu N (2009) Landsliding in partially saturated materials. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1029/2008GL035996
Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P (2015) Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci 81:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.007
Ham J, Chen Y, Crawford M, Ghosh J (2005) Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43:492–501
Hodgson FDI (1978) The use of multiple linear regression in simulating ground-water level responses. Ground Water 16(4):249–253
Hong Y-M, Wan S (2011) Forecasting groundwater level fluctuations for rainfall-induced landslide. Nat Hazards 57:167–184. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9603-9
Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36(7):1897–1910
James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2014) An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer, New York
Jan C-D , Chen T-H, Lo W-C (2007) Effect of rainfall intensity and distribution on groundwater level fluctuations. J Hydrol 332(3–4):348–360
Krkač M (2015) A phenomenological model of the Kostanjek landslide movement based on the landslide monitoring parameters. Dissertation, University of Zagreb (in Croatian)
Krkač M, Mihalić Arbanas S, Arbanas Ž, Bernat S, Špehar K, Watanabe N, Nagai O, Sassa K, Marui H, Furuya G, Wang C, Rubinić J, Matsunami K (2014a) Review of monitoring parameters of the Kostanjek Landslide (Zagreb, Croatia). In: Sassa K, Canuti P, Yin Y (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd World Landslide Forum ‘Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment’, vol 2. Methods of landslide studies. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 637–645
Krkač M, Mihalić Arbanas S, Nagai O, Arbanas Ž, Špehar K (2014b) The Kostanjek landslide—monitoring system development and sensor network. In: Mihalić Arbanas S, Arbanas Ž (eds) Proceedings of the 1st regional symposium on landslides in the Adriatic-Balkan region: landslide and flood hazard assessment. Croatian Landslide Group, Zagreb, pp 27–32
Lebedev AV, Westman B, Van Westenc GJP, Kramberger MG, Lundervold A, Aarsland D, Soininen H, Kłoszewska I, Mecocci P, Tsolaki M, Vellas B, Lovestone S, Simmons A (2014) Random Forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease with a good between-cohort robustness. NeuroImage Clin 6:115–125
Lee LJE, Lawrence DSL, Price M (2006) Analysis of water-level response to rainfall and implications for recharge pathways in the Chalk aquifer, SE England. J Hydrol 330:604–620
Mansour MF, Morgenstern NR, Martin CD (2011) Expected damage from displacement of slow-moving slides. Landslides 8(1):117–131. doi:10.1007/s10346-010-0227-7
Martelloni G, Segoni S, Fanti R, Catani F (2011) Rainfall thresholds for the forecasting of landslide occurrence at regional scale. Landslides 9:485–495. doi:10.1007/s10346-011-0308-2
Massey CI, Petley DN, McSaveney MJ (2013) Patterns of movement in reactivated landslides. Eng Geol 159:1–19
Matsuura S, Asano S, Okamoto T (2008) Relationship between rain and/or meltwater, pore-water pressure and displacement of a reactivated landslide. Eng Geol 101:49–59
Micheletti N, Foresti L, Robert S, Leuenberger M, Pedrazzini A, Jaboyedoff M, Kanevski M (2014) Machine learning feature selection methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Math Geosci 46:33–57. doi:10.1007/s11004-013-9511-0
Mihalić Arbanas S, Arbanas Ž, Krkač M (2013) Comprehensive landslide monitoring system: The Kostanjek landslide case study, Croatia. In: Sassa K, He B, McSaveney M, Osamu N (eds) ICL landslide teaching tools. International Consortium on Landslides, Kyoto, pp 158–168
Ortolan Ž, Pleško J (1992) Repeated photogrammetric measurements at shaping geotechnical models of multi-layer landslides. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik 4:51–58
Ortolan Ž (1996) Development of 3D engineering geological model of deep landslide with multiple sliding surffaces (Example of the Podsused Landslide). Disertation, University of Zagreb (in Croatian)
Pal M (2005) Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int J Remote Sens 26:217–222
Pauly O (2012) Random forests for medical applications. Dissertation, Technische Universität München
Peters J, De Baets B, Verhoest NCA, Samson R, Degroeve S, De Becker P, Huybrechts W (2007) Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling. Ecol Model 207:304–318
Pourghasemi HR, Kerle N (2016) Random forests and evidential belief function-based landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Mazandaran Province, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 75(185):1–17. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-4950-1
Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9(2):181–199
Saito M (1965) Forecasting the time of occurrence of a slope failure. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2, Montreal, pp 573–541
Sassa K, Osamu N, Solidum R, Yamazaki Y, Ohta H (2010) An integrated model simulating the initiation and motion of earthquake and rain induced rapid landslides and its application to the 2006 Leyte landslide. Landslides 7:219–236. doi:10.1007/s10346-010-0230-z
Schilling KE (2009) Investigating local variation in groundwater recharge along a topographic gradient, Walnut Creek, Iowa, USA. Hydrogeol J 17:397–407
Segoni S, Lagomarsino D, Fanti R, Moretti S, Casagli N (2014) Integration of rainfall thresholds and susceptibility maps in the Emilia Romagna (Italy) regional-scale landslide warning system. Landslides 12(4):773–785. doi:10.1007/s10346-014-0502-0
Simoni A, Berti M, Generali M, Elmi C, Ghirotti M (2004) Preliminary result from pore pressure monitoring on an unstable clay slope. Eng Geol 73:117–128
Skempton AW (1985) Residual strength of clays in landslide, folded strata and the laboratory. Geotechnique 35(1):3–18
Stanić B, Nonveiller E (1996) The Kostanjek landslide in Zagreb. Eng Geol 42:269–283
Stumpf A, Kerle N (2011) Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests. Remote Sens Environ 115:2564–2577. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.013
Trigila A, Iadanza C, Esposito C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2015) Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy). Geomorphology 249:119–136. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001
Van Asch TWJ, Van Beek LPH, Bogaard TA (2007) Problems in predicting the mobility of slow-moving landslides. Eng Geol 91:46–55
Venables W N, Smith D M (2014) An introduction to R: a programming environment for data analysis and graphics version 3.1.2. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 17 Dec 2015
Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B (2012) How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides? Ecol Model 239:27–39
Weinheimer A, Biondi F (2003) Varves. In: Holton JR, Curry JA, Pyle JA (eds) Encyclopedia of atmospheric sciences, vol 4. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 1680–1685
Wieczorek GF (1996) Landslide triggering mechanism. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation, special report, vol 247, no 4. Transportation Research Board. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 76–89
Wu J, Zhang R, Yang J (1996) Analysis of precipitation-recharge relationships. J Hydrol 177:143–160
Yoon H, Jun S-C, Hyun Y, Bae G-O, Lee K-K (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 396:128–138
Youssef AM, Pourghasemi HR, Pourtaghi ZS, Al-Katheeri MM (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0614-1
Acknowledgements
The results presented herein have been obtained with the financial support from JST/JICA’s SATREP Program. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank the Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service for the meteorological data. The authors are grateful to Ž. Arbanas and anonymous reviewers for their valuable advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krkač, M., Špoljarić, D., Bernat Gazibara, S., Mihalić Arbanas, S. (2018). TXT-tool 4.385-1.1: Method for Prediction of Landslide Movements Based on Random Forests. In: Sassa, K., Tiwari, B., Liu, KF., McSaveney, M., Strom, A., Setiawan, H. (eds) Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57776-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57777-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)