TXT-tool 4.034-1.1: Quantitative Rockfall Risk Assessment for Roadways and Railways

  • Olga Mavrouli
  • Jordi Corominas


This tool presents a methodology for quantifying the rockfall risk and the consequences for vehicles circulating on roadways and railways. We present a complete and comprehensive methodology for risk assessment, using various risk descriptors, with an emphasis on the quantification of the exposure of the vehicles and the consequences from rockfall hits, in function of the rockfall frequency and magnitude. Indications on the calculation of the repair costs for damaged roadways and railways and for the indirect loss, due to their temporary closure, are also given. This methodology is useful for end-users involved in the risk management and the design of protection measures.


Rockfalls Risk assessment Roadways Railways Vehicles 



This work was realized with the support of the project RockRisk funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BIA2013-42582-P).


  1. Algiardi F, Crosta GB, Frattini P (2009) Integrating rockfall risk assessment and countermeasure design by 3D modeling techniques. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1059–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Budetta P (2004) Assessment of rockfall risk along roads. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4(1):71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunce CM, Cruden DM, Morgenstem NR (1997) Assessment of the hazard from rockfall on a highway. Can Geotech J 34:344–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corominas J, Mavrouli O (2013) Rockfall quantitative risk assessment. In: Lambert S, Nicot F (eds) Rockfall engineering. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  5. Corominas J, Mavrouli O (2014) Quantitative rockfall risk assessment in the roadways of Gipuzkoa, AEG XII Congress, vol 2, Torino, 15–19 Sept 2014, pp 1813–1813Google Scholar
  6. Corominas J, Moya J (2008) Assessing landslide frequency: a review. Eng Geol 102:193–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corominas J, Moya J (2010) Contribution of dendrochronology to the determination of magnitude–frequency relationships for landslides. Geomorphology 124(3):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corominas J, Van WC, Frattini P, Cascini L, Malet JP, Fotopoulou S, Pitilakis K (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Env 73(2):209–263Google Scholar
  9. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64:65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dussauge-Peisser C, Helmstetter A, Grasso JR, Hantz D, Desvarreux P, Jeannin M, Giraud A (2002) Probabilistic approach to rock fall hazard assessment: potential of historical data analysis. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2(1/2):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fell R, Ho KK, Lacasse S, Leroi E (2005) A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In: Landslide risk management, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  12. Ferlisi S, Cascini L, Corominas J, Matano F (2012) Rockfall risk assessment to persons travelling in vehicles along a road: the case study of the Amalfi coastal road (southern Italy). Nat Hazards 62(2):691–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finlay PJ, Fell R (1997) Landslides: risk perception and acceptance. Can Geotech J 34(2):169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Wieczorek GF (2003) Rockfall hazard and risk assessment in the Yosemite Valley, California, USA. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hungr O, Evans SG, Hazzard J (1999) Magnitude and frequency of rockfalls and rock slides along the main transportation corridors of southwestern British Columbia”. Can Geotech J 36:224–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malamud BD, Turcotte DL, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2004) Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surf Proc Land 29(6):687–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicolet P, Jaboyedoff M, Cloutier C, Crosta GB, Lévy S (2015) Brief Communication: On direct impact probability of landslides on vehicles. Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:995–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Picarelli L, Oboni F Evans SG, Mostyn G, Fell R (2005) Hazard characterization and quantification. In: Landslide risk management, pp 27–62Google Scholar
  19. Roberds W (2005) Estimating temporal and spatial variability and vulnerability. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberthardt EI (eds) Landslide risk management. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 129–157Google Scholar
  20. Ruiz-Carulla R, Corominas J, Mavrouli O (2015) A methodology to obtain the block size distribution of fragmental rockfall deposits. Landslides 12(4):815–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schnewly DM, Stoffel (2008) Spatial analysis of rockfall activity, bounce heights and geomorphic changes over the last 50 years—a case study using dendrogeomorphology. Geomorphology 102:522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Turcotte DL, Malamud BD, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (2002) Self-organization, the cascade model, and natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(suppl 1):2530–2537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong HN, Ho KKS, Chan YC (1997) Assessment of consequence of landslides. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment—proceedings of the international workshop on landslide risk assessment, Honolulu, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 111–149Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations