Skip to main content

TXT-tool 4.039-3.2: How to Assess Landslide Activity and Intensity with Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI): The PSI-Based Matrix Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1088 Accesses

Abstract

This paper provides a step-by-step analysis and discussion of the ‘PSI-based matrix approach’, a methodology that exploits ground deformation velocities derived through Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) for the assessment of the state of activity and intensity of extremely to very slow landslides. Two matrices based on historical and recent PSI data are designed respectively for landslides already mapped in preexisting inventories and for newly identified phenomena. A unique intensity scale is proposed applicable to both cases. An example application in the 14 km2 area of Verbicaro in Northern Calabria (Italy) is presented. For this sample site, PSI data derived from SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) images acquired by ERS1/2 and RADARSAT1/2 satellites in the period 1992–2011 are employed. Ground velocities measured along the satellite Line Of Sight (LOS) are projected along the maximum slope directions to derive more reliable deformation rates. An activity threshold of ±5 mm/year is determined by applying the average projected velocity of local slopes to the PSI data precision. The intensity threshold between extremely and very slow phenomena (16 mm/year) is reduced by ~20% to account for temporal and spatial averages, being applied to attribute representative velocities to each landslide. The methodology allows assessing the state of activity and the intensity for 13 of the 24 landslides pre-mapped in the 2007 inventory and for two newly identified phenomena. Results, as well as the major factors influencing the approach, are shown and discussed. Pending issues of the proposed methodology are critically tackled and include the lack of PSI data within the landslide boundaries, temporal coverage of the available estimates, need of field checks, and operative procedures to set the activity and intensity thresholds.

The original version of this chapter was revised: Affiliation correction has been incorporated. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_55

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Amodio Morelli L, Bonardi G, Colonna V, Dietrich D, Giunta G, Ippolito F et al (1976) L′arco Calabro-Peloritano nell′orogene Appenninico- Maghrebide. Mem Soc Geol Ital 17:1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini S, Cigna F, Righini G, Proietti C, Casagli N (2012) Landslide hotspot mapping by means of persistent scatterer interferometry. Environ Earth Sci 67:1155–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini S, Cigna F, Casagli N (2013) Improving landslide inventories with multi-temporal measures of ground displacements retrieved through Persistent Scatterer Interferometry. In: Proceedings of the second world landslide forum, Rome (Italy), vol 3, pp 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Fornaro G, Peduto D (2010) Advanced low and full resolution DInSAR map generation for slow-moving landslide analysis at different scales. Eng Geol 112:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catani F, Casagli N, Ermini L, Righini G, Menduni G (2005) Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin. Landslides 2(4):329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigna F, Bianchini S, Casagli N (2013) How to assess landslide activity and intensity with persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI): the PSI-based matrix approach. Landslides 3(10):267–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigna F, Bianchini S, Righini G, Proietti C, Casagli N (2010). Updating landslide inventory maps in mountain areas by means of Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) and photo-interpretation: Central Calabria (Italy) case study. In: Malet JP, Glade T, Casagli N (eds) Mountain risks: bringing science to society (572 pp). CERG Editions, Strasbourg, France, pp 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M, Iodice A, Magnapane L, Pietranera L (2000) Monitoring terrain movements by means of sparse SAR differential interferometric measurements. In: Proceedings of IGARSS 2000, 20th IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 24–28 July 2000, pp 3225–3227

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, Sp. Rep. 247, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. National Academy, Washington DC, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein HH (1988) Landslide risk assessment procedure. In: Special Lecture, Proceedings of 5th international symposium on landslides. Lausanne, Switzerland, Rotterdam, Balkema, vol 2, pp 1075–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina P, Colombo D, Fumagalli A, Marks F, Moretti S (2006) Permanent scatterers for landslide investigations: outcomes from the ESA-SLAM project. Eng Geol 88:200–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F (2001) Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(1):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangioni S, Bianchini S, Moretti S (2015) Landslide inventory updating by means of persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI): the Setta basin (Italy) case study. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 6(5-7):419–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O (1997) Some methods of landslide intensity mapping. In: Cruden D, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Proceedings of the international workshop on landslide risk assessment, Honolulu, USA, 19–21 Feb 1997. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • IUGS/WGL-International Union of Geological Sciences Working Group on Landslides (1995) A suggested method for describing the rate of movement of a landslide. IAEG Bull 52(75–78):1933–1939

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisina C, Zucca F, Notti D, Colombo A, Cucchi A, Savio G, Giannico C, Bianchi M (2008) Geological interpretation of PSInSAR data at regional scale. Sensors 8(11):7469–7492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notti D, Davalillo JC, Herrera G, Mora O (2010) Assessment of the performance of X-band satellite radar data for landslide mapping and monitoring: Upper Tena Valley case study. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1865–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notti D, Herrera G, Bianchini S, Meisina C, García-Davalillo JC, Zucca F (2014) A methodology for improving landslide PSI data analysis. Int J Remote Sens 35(6):2186–2214

    Google Scholar 

  • Righini G, Pancioli V, Casagli N (2012) Updating landslide inventory maps using persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI). Int J Remote Sens 33(7):2068–2096. doi:10.1080/01431161.2011.605087

    Google Scholar 

  • WP/WLI—Working Party on World Landslide Inventory (1993) Multilingual glossary for landslides. The Canadian Geotechnical Society, BiTech, Richmond BC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the SAFER (Services and Applications For Emergency Response) project, funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme under the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security initiative, with Grant Agreement no. 218802.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Cigna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cigna, F., Bianchini, S., Casagli, N. (2018). TXT-tool 4.039-3.2: How to Assess Landslide Activity and Intensity with Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI): The PSI-Based Matrix Approach. In: Sassa, K., Tiwari, B., Liu, KF., McSaveney, M., Strom, A., Setiawan, H. (eds) Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics