Abstract
This chapter explores some of the theoretical and methodological challenges that arise in the empirical study of subjectivity in general and the subjectivity of certainty in particular. It approaches the feeling of certainty from two theoretical perspectives based on the Kleinian and Lacanian schools of thought and argues that each perspective is based on divergent but complementary pre-theoretical assumptions about subjectivity. While the Kleinian approach focuses on analysis of object-relations, the Lacanian theory of subjectivity focuses on language and symbolic representation. Drawing on anthropological material on Islamic piety, the chapter argues that robust psychosocial analysis must attend to experiences of both object-relations and symbolic representations in the analysis of subjectivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Durham: Duke University Press.
De Saussure, F. (1986). Course in general linguistics. Chicago: Open Court.
Ferenczi, S. (1926). The problem of acceptance of unpleasant ideas: Advances in knowledge of the sense of reality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7, 312–323.
Figlio, K. (2006). The absolute state of mind in society and the individual. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 11, 119–143.
Fink, B. (2004). Lacan to the letter: Reading ecrits closely. Minneapolis: University of Minnesotta Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1984). The use of pleasure: Volume 2 of the history of sexuality. New York: Vintage.
Freud, S. (1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XIV, pp. 109–140). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVIII, pp. 65–144). London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1925). Negation. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XIX, pp. 233–240). London: Hogarth.
Frosh, S. (1989). Psychoanalysis and psychology: Minding the gap. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hinshelwood, R. (1991). A dictionary of Kleinian thought. London: Karnac.
Hirschkind, C. (2001). The ethics of listening: Cassette-Sermon audition in contemporary Egypt. American Ethnologist, 28(3), 623–649.
Klein, M. (1930). The importance of symbol-formation in the development of the ego. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 11, 24–39.
Klein, M. (1935). A contribution to the psychogenesis of manic-depressive states. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 16, 145–174.
Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27, 99–110.
Lacan, J. (2000). The psychoses: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III 1955–1956. London: Routledge.
Lacan, J. (2006). The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Écrits: The first complete edition in English (pp. 75–81). London: W.W. Norton and Company.
Laidlaw, J. (2014). The subject of virtue: An anthropology of ethics and freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laplanche, J. (1993). Essays on otherness. London: Routledge.
Likierman, M. (2001). Melanie Klein: Her work in context. London: Cromwell Press.
Mahmood, S. (2005). The politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency. Cambridge: Polity.
Meltzer, D. (1973). Sexual states of mind. Strath Tay: Clunie.
Mintchev, N. (2015). A theoretical impasse? The concept of the symbolic in Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan. Psychoanalytische Perspectieven, 33(3), 307–324.
Moore, H. (2007). The subject of anthropology: Gender, symbolism and psychoanalysis. Cambridge: Polity.
Moore, H. (2011). Still life: Hopes, desires and satisfactions. Cambridge: Polity.
Ortner, S. (2005). Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory, 5, 31–52.
Prager, J. (1998). Presenting the past: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of misremembering. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Salecl, R. (2004). On anxiety. London: Routledge.
Segal, H. (1988). Introduction to the work of Melanie Klein. London: Karnac.
Simon, G. (2009). The soul freed of cares? Islamic prayer, subjectivity, and the contradictions of moral selfhood in Minangkabau, Indonesia. American Ethnologist, 36(2), 258–275.
Wilkomirski, B. (1996). Fragments: Memories of a childhood, 1939–1948. London: Picador.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. London: Blackwell.
Žižek, S. (2008). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mintchev, N. (2017). What Is Subjectivity and How Can We Study It Empirically? Understanding the Feeling of Certainty Through Psychoanalysis and Ethnography. In: Mintchev, N., Hinshelwood, R. (eds) The Feeling of Certainty. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57717-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57717-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57716-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57717-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)