Skip to main content

Joseph Agassi from Metaphysics to Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Encouraging Openness

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 325))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

Joseph Agassi’s defense of speculation and of metaphysics is the result his overall conception of philosophy and his epistemological stance. Philosophy for Agassi is the “merciless” search for principles which invariably ends in the central tenant of critical rationalism: “we are all in error.” Critical rationalism is the relentless search for truth through the testing of ideas. Philosophy thus conceptualized can abide neither Karl Popper’s fideism nor Wittgenstein’s mysticism as both delimit rationality, resulting in a kind of pseudo-rationalism. Because rationality must be relentless, it seeks ideas from all sources and tests them, including the metaphysical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1975. Science in flux, Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Philosophia 6 (1): 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Towards a rational philosophical anthropology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Was Wittgenstein really necessary? In Science and society: Studies in the sociology of science, Boston studies in the philosophy of science, ed. Joseph Agassi, vol. 65, 33–43. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Pub/Kluwer Boston Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Theories of rationality. In Rationality: The critical view, Nijhoff international philosophy series, ed. Joseph Agassi and Ian C. Jarvie, 249–263. Dordrecht/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Critical rationalism, comprehensive or qualified: The Popper-Bartley dispute. In Der kritische Rationalismus als Denkmethode und Lebensweise : Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Hans Albert, ed. Giuseppe Franco and Hans Albert, 34–55. Klagenfurt: Kitab.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Letters to my sister concerning contemporary philosophy, with special reference to the philosophy of education, the philosophy of science, and the Yom Kippur War. Unpublished manuscript in the author’s possession.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, William Warren. 1962. The retreat to commitment. 1st ed. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, Gerard, William Warren Bartley, and Karl R. Popper. 1987. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher R. Donohue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donohue, C.R. (2017). Joseph Agassi from Metaphysics to Politics. In: Bar-Am, N., Gattei, S. (eds) Encouraging Openness. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics