Abstract
Francis Bacon, widely appreciated as the father of the experimental method in science, proposed that science is inductive. Popper put critical testing of hypotheses against empirical evidence at the center of his epistemology, thereby excluding the act of conceiving or inventing a hypothesis or theory from his logical analysis of science. Michael Polanyi considered science as a social system based on epistemic authority and apprenticeship, stressing the informal and personal aspects of science. Using cases from genetics, embryology, molecular biology, and genomics, this essay (i) shows that induction, scientific authority and critical theory testing have been integral parts of scientific practice in the history of modern biology since the nineteenth century. This is despite the fact that a rigid adherence to Popper’s principle of falsifiability is irreconcilable with scientific practice. (ii) analyzes the change of epistemology within recent developments in biology, particularly big data genomics. In these induction plays a major role while Polanyi’s notions of epistemic authority and apprenticeship as well as Popper’s principles of hypothesis, prediction and experimental testing are largely marginalized. The consequences of their disregard are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agassi, Joseph. 1981. Science and society: Studies in the sociology of science, Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science. Dordrecht/Heidelberg: Springer.
———. 2013. The very idea of modern science. Francis Bacon and Robert Boyle, Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science. Dordrecht/Heidelberg: Springer.
Anderson, Chris. 2008. The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. 23 June 2008. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/. Accessed 22 Nov 2016.
Bar-Am, Nimrod. 2014. The structure of scientific revolutions, fourth edition, 50th anniversary. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44: 688. doi: 10.1177/0048393112473424 (http://pos.sagepub.com/content/44/5/688)
Barthelmess, Alfred. 1952. Vererbungswissenschaft. Freiburg: Alber.
Calver, N. 2013. Sir Peter Medawar: Science, creativity and the popularization of Karl Popper. Notes and records. The Royal Society for the History of Science. 22 May 2013. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2013.0022.
Canguilhem, Georges. [1952] 2009. Die Erkenntnis des Lebens (trans. from French: La connaissance de la vie). Berlin: August Verlag.
Coveney, P.V., Edward R. Dougherty, and Roger R. Highfield. 2016. Big data need big theory too. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0153.
D’Arcy Thompson, W. [1917] 1942. On growth and form, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, E.H. 2006. The regulatory genome: Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press.
———. 2016. Genomics, “discovery science”, systems biology, and causal explanation: What really works? Perspect.Biol.Med. 58: 165–181. doi:10.1353/pbm.2015.0025.
Deichmann, U. 2004. Early responses to Avery’s et al.’s 1944 paper on DNA as hereditary material. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences. 34 (2): 207–233.
———. 2011. Michael Polanyi on scientific authority and his criticisms of Popper and Russell. In Yearbook of the Leo Baeck Institute, vol. 56, 249–268. London: Oxford University Press.
Discovery science. 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_science. Accessed 25 Aug 2016.
Gliboff, S. 1999. Gregor Mendel and the laws of evolution. History of Science 37: 217–235.
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2008. Induction, Samples, and Kinds. For a collection of papers from the 2008 Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference. http://philosophy.fas.nyu.edu/docs/IO/11840/pgsinduction.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2016.
Jacobs, S. 2002. Polanyi’s presagement of the incommensurability concept. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A. 33: 105–120.
Herskowitz, I.H. 1962. Genetics. Boston: Little, Brown, Supplements.
Katz, E.A. 2012. Bridges between mathematics, natural sciences, architecture and art: case of fullerenes. Book of papers and extended abstracts of the 1st International Conference “Art, Science and Technology: Interaction between Three Cultures”, ed. by T. Kravchuk, A. Groysman, C. Soddu, E. Colabella and G. Leisman, 60–71. Milano: Domus Argenia.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehrach, H. 2016. Interview with Hans Lehrach by Ute Deichmann. Berlin, 9 February 2016.
Loeb, J. 1916. The organism as a whole from a physicochemical viewpoint. New York/London: Putnam’s Sons.
Maderspacher, F. 2008. Theodor Boveri and the natural experiment. Current Biology 18 (R): 278–R286. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.061.
Medawar, P. [1963] 1996. Hypothesis and imagination. Times Lit. Suppl. (25 October 1963), in: Medawar, P. 1996. The strange case of the spotted mice and other classic essays on science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mendel, G. 1866. Experiments in plant hybridization (Versuche űber Pflanzen-Hybriden). Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereins in Brűnn, 4, 3–47, (Read at the meetings of February 8th, and March 8th, 1865; in English translation at mendelweb.org).
Morange, M. 2014. Genome as a multipurpose structure built by evolution. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 57: 162–171.
Morgan, T.H. 1934. Embryology and genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nye, Mary Jo. 2011. Michael Polanyi and his generation: Origins of the social construction of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Peter, I.S., E. Faure, and E.H. Davidson. 2012. Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109: 16434–16442. doi:10.1073/pnas.1207852109.
Pigliucci, M. 2009. The end of theory in science? EMBO Reports 10: 534. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.111.
Polanyi, M. [1958] 1962. Personal knowledge – towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1963. The potential theory of adsorption. Science. 141: 1010–1013. doi:10.1126/science.141.3585.1010.
———. 1966. The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.
Popper, K. [1959] 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London/New York: Routledge.
Rothenberg, E.V. 2016. Eric Davidson: Steps to a gene regulatory network for development. Developmental Biology 412: S7–S19. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.01.020.
Stewart, Douglas.1994. Herbert Simon on the mind in the machine. http://www.omnimagazine.com/archives/interviews/simon/index.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2016.
Snyder, Laura J. 2012. “William Whewell”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2012 Edition. ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/whewell/. Accessed 23 Nov 2016.
Acknowledgement
I thank Mary Jo Nye for her valuable comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deichmann, U. (2017). Francis Bacon, Karl Popper, Michael Polanyi, and Modern Experimental Biology. In: Bar-Am, N., Gattei, S. (eds) Encouraging Openness. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57669-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57668-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57669-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)