Skip to main content

Source Impacts on and Cardiorespiratory Effects of Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Water-Soluble PM2.5 Across the Eastern United States

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXV (ITM 2016)

Abstract

It is hypothesized that PM2.5 with high oxidative potential (OP) can catalytically generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) in excess of the body’s antioxidant capacity, leading to oxidative stress. Therefore, two advanced methods for conducting source apportionment, along with field experiments characterizing air quality, are used to identify the sources of PM2.5 with high OP and relate them to acute health effects. The field study measured OP of ambient water-soluble PM2.5 using a dithiothreitol (DTT) assay at four sites across the Southeastern United States from June 2012 to June 2013. Source apportionment was performed on collocated speciated PM2.5 samples using the Chemical Mass Balance Method with ensemble-trained profiles in Atlanta, GA and CMAQ-DDM for Atlanta and all other measurement sites (Yorkville, GA, Centerville, AL, and Birmingham, AL). Source-OP relationships were investigated using least squares linear regression. The model for Atlanta, GA was applied to PM2.5 source impacts from 1998–2010 to estimate long-term trends in ambient PM2.5 OP for use in population-level acute epidemiologic studies. Biomass burning contributes the largest fraction to total historical OP in Atlanta, followed by light-duty gasoline vehicles and heavy-duty diesel vehicles (43, 22 and 17%, respectively). Results find significant associations between estimated OP and emergency department visits related to congestive heart failure and asthma/wheezing attacks, supporting the hypothesis that PM2.5 health effects are, in part, due to oxidative stress and that OP is a useful indicator of PM2.5 health impacts. Finally, controlling PM2.5 sources with high OP, like biomass burning, may help prevent acute health effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balachandran et al (2012) Ensemble-trained source apportionment of fine particulate matter and method uncertainty analysis. Atmos Environ 61:387–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates et al (2015) Reactive oxygen species generation linked to sources of atmospheric particulate matter and cardiorespiratory effects. Environ Sci Technol 49(22):13605–13612

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunekreef B, Holgate ST (2002) Air pollution and health. Lancet 360(9341):1233–1242

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho et al (2005) Redox activity of airborne particulate matter at different sites in the Los Angeles Basin. Environ Res 99(1):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfino et al (2005) Potential role of ultrafine particles in associations between airborne particle mass and cardiovascular health. Environ Health Perspect 113(8):934–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton et al (2005) The southeastern aerosol research and characterization study: Part II. Filter-based measurements of fine and coarse particulate matter mass and composition. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55(10):1527–1542

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang T, Verma V, Guo H, King LE, Edgerton ES, Weber RJ (2015) A semi-automated system for quantifying the oxidative potential of ambient particles in aqueous extracts using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay: results from the southeastern center for air pollution and epidemiology (SCAPE). Atmos Meas Tech 8(1):471–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass et al (2015) Ensemble-based source apportionment of fine particulate matter and emergency department visits for pediatric asthma. Am J Epidemiol 181(7):504–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen et al (2003) The southeastern aerosol research and characterization study: Part 1-overview. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53(12):1460–1471

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen et al (2006) Air quality measurements for the aerosol research and inhalation epidemiology study. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 56(10):1445–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Balachandran S, Pachon JE, Baek J, Ivey C, Holmes H, Odman MT, Mulholland JA, Russell AG (2014) Fine particulate matter source apportionment using a hybrid chemical transport and receptor model approach. Atmos Chem Phys 14(11):5415–5431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope et al (2009) Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N Engl J Med 360 (4):376–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland et al (2010) Short-term associations between ambient air pollutants and pediatric asthma emergency department visits. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182(3):307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian et al (2009) Assessment of biomass burning emissions and their impacts on urban and regional PM2.5: a Georgia case study. Environ Sci Technol 43(2):299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma et al (2014) Reactive oxygen species associated with water-soluble PM2.5 in the southeastern United States: spatiotemporal trends and source apportionment. Atmos Chem Phys 14(23):12915–12930

    Google Scholar 

  • Winquist et al (2015) Impact of ambient fine particulate matter carbon measurement methods on observed associations with acute cardiorespiratory morbidity. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 25(2):215–221

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded, in part, by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Grants RD834799, RD83096001, RD83107601 and RD83215901. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the grantee and do not necessarily represent the official views of the US EPA. Further, the US EPA does not endorse the purchase of any commercial products or services mentioned in the publication. Observational data and logistical support was provided by Atmospheric Research & Analysis, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josephine T. Bates .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Questions and Answers

Questions and Answers

Questioner: Peter Viaene.

Question: Is there any specific reason why you couldn’t/didn’t include all source types? Isn’t there a risk of missing indirect effects these other sources could have on your results?

Answer: For the source apportionment step, we used all available sources with profiles for CMB in Atlanta and 15 relevant sources developed for CMAQ-DDM. In the regression modelling, there are two main reasons that sources were removed from the model, one statistical and one physical. First, we wanted to avoid overfitting of the model by removing coefficients that were not statistically significant. Second, we wanted to investigate which sources contributed the most to OP and thus be used to simulate OP of ambient PM2.5 by removing sources without significant impact and analyzing how the results changed. Removing these sources did not change the R2 of the model significantly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bates, J.T. et al. (2018). Source Impacts on and Cardiorespiratory Effects of Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Water-Soluble PM2.5 Across the Eastern United States. In: Mensink, C., Kallos, G. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXV. ITM 2016. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57645-9_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics