Skip to main content

The Role of Hysteroembryoscopy in the Management of Spontaneous and Repeated Pregnancy Loss

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hysteroscopy

Abstract

Hystero-embryoscopy (HEpy) can be used for an in situ autopsy of an embryo in spontaneous as well as in repeated pregnancies loss (RPL). Such an autopsy of a miscarriage embryo can provide useful information regarding the morphology of the embryo, ruling out anatomical defects and collecting the embryo under direct vision anticipating an accurate embryo karyotyping. In this prospective study the cause of a spontaneous miscarriage (SM) and RPL was investigated. Many RPL cases that have been diagnosed and treated may experience a consequent miscarriage during next pregnancy. This constituted a major interest in our research. Embryo autopsy was performed by hysteroscopy technique using 2.9–5 mm hysteroscopes, 5Fr graspers and scissors and normal saline as distending medium. The embryo morphology results were correlated with the genetic results and compared with the patients’ diagnosis and treatment during the last miscarriage. Chromosomal abnormalities diagnosed in 70% of both SM and RPL cases while morphological defects observed in 51% and 15.7% respectively. In 10.6% of the SM and 5.9% of the RPL cases HEpy failed to diagnose a clear cause of the miscarriage indicating other etiological factors, probably due to myometrial dysfunction. Embryoscopy seems to be a valuable method for accurate diagnosis of the miscarriage cause during first trimester SM and RPL and can be especially useful for future treatment purposes. Standardization of RPL patients’ clinical characteristics criteria and treatment protocols are imperative to perform studies with reliable results. The combination of 4D sonography, in situ embryo autopsy together with embryo genetic analysis will probably enlighten our knowledge about the cause of SM and RPL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crotti L, Tester DJ, White WM, et al. Long QT syndrome—associated mutations in intrauterine fetal death. JAMA. 2013;309(14). doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3219.

  2. Stephenson MD, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):1076–82. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robberecht C, Pexsters A, Jan D, Fryns JP, D’Hooghe T, Vermeesch JR. Cytogenetic and morphological analysis of early products of conception following hystero-embryoscopy from couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:933–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carp HJA, Toder V, Orgad S, Aviram A, Danieli M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:678–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:446–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Warburton D, Neugut RH, Lustenberger A, Nicholas A, Kline J. No association between spennicide use and trisomy at prenatal diagnosis. New Engl J Med. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frias AE Jr, Luikenaar RA, Sullivan AE, Lee RM, Porter TF, Branch DW, Silver RM. Poor obstetric outcome in subsequent pregnancies in women with prior fetal death. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):521–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canhao P, Falcao F, Ferro JM. Thrombolytics for cerebral sinus thrombosis: a systematic review. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15:159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill MA. Embryology BGDA lecture—development of the embryo/fetus 1. 2017. https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/BGDA_Lecture_Development_of_the_Embryo/Fetus_1.

  10. Rosenfeld JA, Oppenheim S, DeSalle R. A whole genome gene content phylogenetic analysis of anopheline mosquitoes. Mol Phylogenet Evol. PMID: 27866013. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.11.006.

  11. Qin J-Z, Pang L-H, Li M-Q, Xu J, Zhou X (2013) Risk of chromosomal abnormalities in early spontaneous abortion after assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE8(10): e75953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075953.

  12. Simpson JL, Bombard AT. Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion: frequency, pathology and genetic counseling. In: KBMJ E, editor. Spontaneous abortion. London: Blackwell; 1987. p. 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goddijn M, Leschot NJ. Genetic aspects of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:855–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassold TJ. A cytogenetic study of repeated spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32(5):723–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Benadiva CA, Kligman I, Munne S. Aneuploidy 16 in human embryos increases significantly with maternal age. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:248–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Angell RR Aneuploidy in older women. Higher rates of aneuploidy in oocytes from older women. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1199–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:280–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:382–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nasseri A, Mukherjee T, Grifo JA, Noyes N, Krey L, et al. Elevated day 3 serum follicle stimulating hormone and/or estradiol may predict fetal aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:715–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Farr SL, Schieve LA, Jamieson DJ. Pregnancy loss among pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1380–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolaides P, Petersen M. Origin and mechanisms of non-disjunction in human autosomal trisomies. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:313–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JW, Lee WS, Yoon TK, Seok HH, Cho JH, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion after assisted reproductive treatment. BMC Med Genet. 2010;11:153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y, Cheng Q, Meng L, Luo C, Hu H, Zhang J, Cheng J, Xu T, Jiang T, Liang D, Hu P, Xu Z. Clinical application of SNP array analysis in first-trimester pregnancy loss: a prospective study. Clin Genet. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Angiolucci M, Murru R, Melis G, et al. Association between different morphological types and abnormal karyotypes in early pregnancy loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:219–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. European Stroke Initiative Executive Committee; EUSI Writing Committee, Olsen TS, Langhorne P, Diener HC, Hennerici M, Ferro J, Sivenius J, Wahlgren NG, Bath P. European Stroke Initiative recommendations for stroke management-update 2003. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(4):311–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Branch DW, Gibson M, Silver RM. Clinical practice. Recurrent miscarriage. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1740–7. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1005330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Meza-Espinoza JP, Anguiano LO, Rivera H. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with reproductive disorders. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(4):237–40. Epub 2008 Jul 22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laurino MY, et al. Genetic evaluation and counseling of couples with recurrent miscarriage: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2005;14(3):165–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Philipp T, Philipp K, Reiner A, Beer F, Kalousek DK. Embryoscopic and cytogenetic analysis of 233 missed abortions: factors involved in the pathogenesis of developmental defects of early failed pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1724–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:300–4. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00495-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Franssen MTM, et al. Selective chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: case-control study. BMJ. 2005;331: 137–41. PMC: Web 10 Feb 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kavalier F. Investigation of recurrent miscarriages. BMJ. 2005;331(7509):121–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoshino O, Nishii O, Osuga Y, Asada H, Okuda S, Orisaka M, Hayashi T. Myomectomy decreases abnormal uterine peristalsis and increases pregnancy rate. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(1):63–7. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toth B, Würfel W, Bohlmann MK, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Nawroth F, Rogenhofer N, Tempfer C, Wischmann T, von Wolff M. Recurrent miscarriage: diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG), German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, guideline of the DGGG (S1-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/050, December 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kristiina R, Liina N, Maris L. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions. Front Genet. 2012;3. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2012.00034. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00034, ISSN: 1664-8021.

  36. Daher S, Mattar R, Gueuvoghlanian-Silva BY, Torloni MR. Genetic polymorphisms and recurrent spontaneous abortions: an overview of current knowledge. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67:341–7. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01123.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaare M. Genetic studies on recurrent miscarriage. Doctoral dissertation (article-based), University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Haartman Institute Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics. 2009. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-5259-0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasilios Tanos M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tanos, V., Georgiou, D., Neofytou, M., Meridis, E., Paschopoulos, M. (2018). The Role of Hysteroembryoscopy in the Management of Spontaneous and Repeated Pregnancy Loss. In: Tinelli, A., Alonso Pacheco, L., Haimovich, S. (eds) Hysteroscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57559-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57559-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57558-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57559-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics