Skip to main content

Resolving Inconsistencies of Scope Interpretations in Sum-Product Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1765 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10233))

Abstract

Sum-product networks (SPNs) are a deep learning model that have shown impressive results in several artificial intelligence applications. Tractable inference in practice requires an SPN to be complete and either consistent or decomposable. These properties can be verified using the definition of scope. In fact, the notion of scope can be used to define SPNs when they are interpreted as hierarchically structured latent variables in mixture models.

In this paper, we first show that the mixture model definition of scope is inconsistent with interpreting SPNs as arithmetic circuit (ACs), the network on which SPNs were founded. We then propose a definition of scope that is consistent with an AC interpretation. We next show that the AC definition of scope can be used for verifying the completeness property of SPNs, but not for verifying consistency or decomposability, nor is it consistent with a mixture model interpretation. We resolve the above inconsistencies by presenting a more general definition of scope that remains suitable for both AC and mixture model interpretations of SPNs, and can also be used for verifying the complete, consistent, and decomposable properties of SPNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amer, M.R., Todorovic, S.: Sum-product networks for modeling activities with stochastic structure. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1314–1321. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, W.C., Kok, S., Pham, H.V., Chieu, H.L., Chai, K.M.A.: Language modeling with sum-product networks. In: INTERSPEECH, pp. 2098–2102 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, G.: The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artif. Intell. 42(2–3), 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Darwiche, A.: A differential approach to inference in Bayesian networks. J. ACM 50(3), 280–305 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis, A., Ventura, D.: Learning the architecture of sum-product networks using clustering on variables. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2033–2041 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gens, R., Domingos, P.: Discriminative learning of sum-product networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3248–3256 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Peharz, R., Gens, R., Pernkopf, F., Domingos, P.: On the latent variable interpretation in sum-product networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.06180 (2016)

  9. Peharz, R., Geiger, B.C., Pernkopf, F.: Greedy part-wise learning of sum-product networks. In: Blockeel, H., Kersting, K., Nijssen, S., Železný, F. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8189, pp. 612–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40991-2_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Peharz, R., Kapeller, G., Mowlaee, P., Pernkopf, F.: Modeling speech with sum-product networks: application to bandwidth extension. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 3699–3703. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Poon, H., Domingos, P.: Sum-product networks: a new deep architecture. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 337–346 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rooshenas, A., Lowd, D.: Learning sum-product networks with direct and indirect variable interactions. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 710–718 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vergari, A., Di Mauro, N., Esposito, F.: Visualizing and understanding sum-product networks. arXiv.org (2016)

  14. Zhao, H., Melibari, M., Poupart, P.: On the relationship between sum-product networks and Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of Thirty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jhonatan S. Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oliveira, J.S., Butz, C.J., dos Santos, A.E. (2017). Resolving Inconsistencies of Scope Interpretations in Sum-Product Networks. In: Mouhoub, M., Langlais, P. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10233. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57351-9_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57351-9_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57350-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57351-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics