Abstract
The utilization of digital tools aiming at the cognitive enhancement of students and adults, so that they can achieve better performance and professional or academic success, has increased in recent years. This paper focuses on ICT tools such as computer games, programming languages and educational software as means for cognitive enhancement and attempts to highlight their contributions. Issues of design and the limitations of digital tools are discussed. In the final section, the ethical implications of using educational ICT tools for cognitive enhancement from a virtue ethics perspective are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jak, A.J., A.M. Seelye, and S.M. Jurick. 2013. Crosswords to Computers: A Critical Review of Popular Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement. Neuropsychology Review 23 (1): 13–26.
Dresler, M., A. Sandberg, K. Ohla, C. Bublitz, C. Trenado, A. Mroczko-Wasowicz, S. Kühn, and D. Repantis. 2013. Non-pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement. Neuropharmacology 64: 529–543. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.002.
Buchanan, A. 2011. Cognitive Enhancement and Education. Theory and Research in Education 9 (2): 145–162. doi:10.1177/1477878511409623.
Green, C.S., and D. Bavelier. 2015. Action Video Game Training for Cognitive Enhancement. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 4: 103–108. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352154615000613.
Connolly, T.M., et al. 2012. A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence on Computer Games and Serious Games. Computers & Education 59 (2): 661–686. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004.
Papert, S. 1980. MindStorms, Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Georgouli, K., and C. Sgouropoulou. 2013. Collaborative Peer-Evaluation Learning Results in Higher Education Programming-Based Courses. ICBL2013 – International Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Blended Learning, 309–314.
Demetriadis, S., V. Giannouli, and T. Sapounidis. 2015. Robot Programming and Tangible Interfaces for Cognitive Training. In Handbook of Research on Innovations in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1962. In Thought and Language, ed. E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Doukakis, S., and N. Matzakos. 2013. Training Prospective Engineering Educators in the Use of GeoGebra for Simulation Construction. 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 1–5. Antalya, Turkey: IEEE. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6671048/?arnumber=6671048.
Gómez-Chacón, I.M., I.M. Romero Albaladejo, and M. del Mar GarcÃa López. 2016. Zig-zagging in Geometrical Reasoning in Technological Collaborative Environments: A Mathematical Working Space-Framed Study Concerning Cognition and Affect. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11858-016-0755-2.
Takaci, D., G. Stankov, and I. Milanovic. 2015. Efficiency of Learning Environment Using GeoGebra When Calculus Contents Are Learned in Collaborative Groups. Computers and Education 82: 421–431.
Hubert-Wallander, B., C.S. Green, and D. Bavelier. 2011. Stretching the Limits of Visual Attention: The Case of Action Video Games. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2 (2): 222–230.
Plerou, A., P. Vlamos, and P. Kourouthanasis. 2014. Screening Dyscalculia and Algorithmic Thinking Difficulties. 1st International Conference on New Developments in Science and Technology Education.
Zibidis, D., M. Chionidou-Moskofoglou, and S. Doukakis. 2011. Primary Teachers’ Embedding Educational Software of Mathematics in Their Teaching Practices. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies 3 (2/3/4): 216–227.
Battaglia, F., and A. Carnevale. 2014. Epistemological and Moral Problems with Human Enhancement. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies (26): III–XXI.
Racine, E., et al. 2014. The Value and Pitfalls of Speculation About Science and Technology in Bioethics: The Case of Cognitive Enhancement. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3): 325–337.
Nida-Rümelin, J. 2007. Human Biotechnology as an Ethical and Social Challenge. In Humanbiotechnology as Social Challenge, ed. N. Knoepffler, D. Schipanski, and S.L. Sorgner, 129–135. Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
Grodzinsky, F. 2001. The Practitioner from Within: Revisiting the Virtues. In Readings in Cyberethics, ed. A.R. Spinello and T.H. Tavani, 580–591. Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Stamatellos, G. 2011. Computer Ethics and Neoplatonic Virtue: A Reconsideration of Cyber Ethics in the Light of Plotinus’ Ethical Theory. International Journal of Cyber Ethics in Education 1 (1): 1–11.
Hermanns, S. 2007. How Virtuous is the Virtual? Perspectives on New Media. Quality of Life and Virtue Ethics, CEPE 2007 July 12–14, University of San Diego, USA.
Roberts, C.R., and W.J. Wood. 2007. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, K.G. 2001. Android Arete: Toward a Virtue Ethic for Computational Agents. Ethics and Information Technology 3 (4): 247–265.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doukakis, S., Stamatellos, G., Glinou, N. (2017). Cognitive Enhancement Using ICT and Its Ethical Implications. In: Vlamos, P. (eds) GeNeDis 2016 . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 989. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57347-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57348-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)