Abstract
The chapter deals with the regional differences in the structure of motivation of early entrepreneurial activity (opportunity vs. necessity driven) in Russia and the factors influencing this difference measured by an index called the share of opportunity-based early entrepreneurs (SOBE). It is shown that the differences in SOBE levels among Russian regions are statistically significant; cross-regional differences in the SOBE level reflect a certain set of regional social and economic factors immediately or with a short-, medium- or even long-term (10 years) lag.
The empirical part is based on the survey designed by the Higher School of Economics which was conducted in 2011 in 79 regions of Russia with a sample of 56,900 respondents. The survey is representative for the structure of the adult population in each of the surveyed regions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Audretsch, D. B., Boente, W., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Regional entrepreneurship capital and its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 687–698.
Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 7–31.
Bosma, N., & Shutjens, V. (2011). Understanding regional variation in entrepreneurial activity and entrepreneurial attitude in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 47, 711–742.
Caliendo, M., & Kritikos, A. S. (2010). Start-ups by the unemployed: Characteristics, survival and direct employment effects. Small Business Economics, 35, 71–92.
Chepurenko, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship and SME policies in the 21st century – The example of Russia. In D. Smallbone & F. Welter (Eds.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policies in central and eastern Europe (pp. 190–209). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Clark, K., & Drinkwater, S. (2000). Pushed out or pulled in? Self-employment among ethnic minorities in England and Wales. Labor Economics, 7, 603–628.
Davidsson, P. (1995). Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7, 41–62.
Desai, S. (2011). Measuring entrepreneurship in developing countries. In W. Naudé (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and economic development (pp. 94–107). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7, 179–188.
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38, 961–975.
Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2007). The persistence of regional new business formation-activity over time – assessing the potential of policy promotion programs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 299–315.
Fritsch, M., & Storey, D. B. (2014). Entrepreneurship in a regional context: Historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional Studies, 48, 939–954.
Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2013). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48, 955–973.
Fritsch, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new business compared in two growth regimes: East and West Germany. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 525–542.
Hessels, J., Van Gelderen, M., & Thurik, R. (2008). Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Business Economics, 31, 323–339.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
Koellinger, P. (2008). Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics, 31, 21–37.
Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. J. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879–891.
McLachlan, G. J. (2004). Discriminant analysis and statistical pattern recognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.
Mueller, P., van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59–71.
Obraztsova, O., & Popovskaya, E. (2012). Mikrodannye vyborochnykh obsledovaniy naseleniya v kontexte razvitiya biznes-demografii v Rossii [Microdata of population surveys in the context of the business demography statistics in Russia]. Voprosy Statistiki [Statistical Issues] 12:8–16 [in Russian].
Reynolds, P. D., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998-2003. Small Business Economics, 24, 205–231.
Storey, D. (1991). The birth of new firms—does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 3, 167–178.
Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Cantner, U. (2014). Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, 42, 221–244.
Valliere, D., & Peterson, R. (2009). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: Evidence from emerging and developed countries. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21, 459–480.
Van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24, 311–321.
Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a Upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.
Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335–350.
Zubarevich, N. (2014). Four Russias: Rethinking the Post-Soviet map. In Regionalism(s): A variety of perspectives from Europe and the Americas (pp. 71–88). Innsbruck: Institut fuer Foederalismus.
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the Center of Fundamental Research of the National research university—Higher School of Economics (Moscow) with a grant ‘The regional fiscal and tax policy’s impact on the entrepreneurial potential’ (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Cross-regional Variation of a Share of Opportunity-Driven Early Entrepreneurs in Russian Federation
Appendix: Cross-regional Variation of a Share of Opportunity-Driven Early Entrepreneurs in Russian Federation
1.1 Database: GeoRating Project (Russia 2011), GEM Consortium (GEM Countries 2011)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chepurenko, A., Popovskaya, E., Obraztsova, O. (2017). Cross-regional Variations in the Motivation of Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity in Russia: Determining Factors. In: Sauka, A., Chepurenko, A. (eds) Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57341-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57342-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)