Skip to main content

Innovations in Cooperatively Organized Breeding Networks: Analysis of Cluster Structures in Dairy Cattle Breeding in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management and Governance of Networks

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 1088 Accesses

Abstract

This article examines the innovation activity of cooperatives in dairy cattle breeding and especially the links between profitability, organization, and innovation in the case of Germany. The combination of an explorative approach and multivariate data analysis, of case studies and data from the official estimation of breeding values, is intended to provide a better understanding of the interdependencies. Our cluster analysis suggests a positive effect of network activity and innovation activity on the profitability of breeding companies. Our results imply that network organizations should be supported by the members. The insights on small cooperatives with a high number of shares per member reveal a second way that could combine the benefits of networks and small cooperatives: the establishment of networks and their splitting in strategic groups with a size-related distribution of shares per member.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The same data set is also used in the German contribution Höhler (2016).

References

  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm Sci Q 45(3):425–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo N (2005) Breeding in Europe under the competition at the global market. In: The 26th European holstein and red holstein conference, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Braguinsky S, Rose DC (2009) Competition, cooperation, and the neighboring farmer effect. J Econ Behav Organ 72(1):361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaddad FR, Cook ML (2004) Understanding new cooperative models: an ownership-control rights typology. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 26(3):348–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook ML (1995) The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: a neo-institutional approach. Am J Agric Econ 77(5):1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan R, Jonard N (2003) The dynamics of collective invention. J Econ Behav Organ 52(4):513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Am Econ Rev 78(5):1133–1137

    Google Scholar 

  • DHV (2014) Estimation of breeding values. Edited by Deutscher Holstein Verband. http://www.holstein-dhv.de/estimation_of_breeding_values.html

  • Dyer JH, Hatch NW (2006) Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships. Strateg Manag J 27(8):701–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015a) Dairy production and products. Edited by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/agriculture/dairy-gateway/milk-production/dairy-animals/cattle/en/#.VbIHOPkvt7w. Accessed 24 July 2015

  • FAO (2015b) Value of Agricultural Production. Edited by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/613/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed 24 July 2015

  • Funk DA (2006) Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry. J Dairy Sci 89(4):1362–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galizzi G, Venturini L (1996) Product innovation in the food industry: nature, characteristics and determinants. In: Müller WA, Schuster P, Galizzi G, Venturini L (eds) Economics of innovation: the case of food industry. Physica-Verlag HD (Contributions to Economics), Heidelberg, pp 133–153

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski PA (1994) Market structure, corporate performance, and innovative activity. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal S (2009) Connections: an introduction to the economics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandke R (2002) Methoden und Modelle zur strategischen Steuerung von neuzeitlichen Zuchtorganisationen. Gießen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn J, Link AN, Vonortas NS (2000) Research partnerships. Res Policy 29(4–5):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig F, Dearing BE (1979) Exploratory data analysis. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-016. Sage, Beverly Hills and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller MA, Eisenberg RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364):698–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold P, Rößler R, Momm H, Valle Zárate A (2012a) Development of organisation and planning in animal breeding: II. An overview on breeding planning. Arch Tierzucht 55(5):519–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold P, Rößler R, Valle Zárate A, Momm H (2012b) Development of organisation and planning in animal breeding: I. A review on breeding organisation. Arch Tierzucht 55(5):402–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhler J (2016, May) Züchtervereinigungen – Innovationsmotor der deutschen Milchviehzucht? Eine explorative Analyse der Organisationsstrukturen und Veränderungen. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 94 (1) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhler J, Kühl R (2015) Organisation of German livestock production from the bottom up: a new institutional economic analysis of dairy cattle breeding. J Chain Netw Sci 16:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langinier C, Moschini G (2002) The economics of patents. In: Rothschild MF, Newman S (eds) Intellectual property rights in animal breeding and genetics. CABI, Wallingford, pp 31–50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ménard C (2004) The economics of hybrid organizations. J Inst Theor Econ 160(3):345–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden ER, Weigel K (2007) Can you shrinkwrap a cow? Protections available for the intellectual property of the animal breeding industry. Anim Genet 38(6):647–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelhak J (2011) Überblick über die rechtliche Stellung von Züchtervereinigungen nach TierZG. Agrar- und Umweltrecht 10:385–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter PK, Scully GW (1987) Economic efficiency in cooperatives. J Law Econ 30(2):489–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendel JM, Robertson A (1950) Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle. J Genet 50(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild MF, Newman S (2002) Intellectual property rights in animal breeding and genetics. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura K (1992) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. Am Econ Rev 82(5):1307–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (1996) Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. J Econ Behav Organ 31(2):193–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Napel J, Veerkamp RF (2015) The Dutch national breeding programmes have developed to major globally operating companies. J Anim Breed Genet 132(3):205–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt MW, Hiemstra SJ, Drucker AG, Louwaars N, Oldenbroek J (2007) Regulatory options for exchange, use and conservation of animal genetic resources: a closer look at property right issues. Anim Genet Resour Inf 41:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Vissak T (2010) Recommendations for using the case study method in international business research. Qual Rep 15(2):370–388

    Google Scholar 

  • VIT (2014) Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V. Relative breeding value (ranked by overall breeding value). Breed: German Holsteins. 12/02/2014. http://www.milchrind.de/dl/5/3/5/2/2/6/German_Holsteins_schwarzbunt_toechterbasiert_aktiv.pdf

  • VIT (2015) Annual report. http://www.vit.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wirsindvit/jahresberichte/vit-JB2014-gesamt.pdf

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2014) Case study research. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Höhler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Data sources

Companies in the sample

Landesverband Thüringer Rinderzüchter eG

www.ltr.de

Masterrind GmbH

www.masterrind.com

Rinder Union West eG

www.ruweg.de

Rinderproduktion Berlin-Brandenburg GmbH

www.rinderzucht-bb.de

Rinderzuchtverband Schleswig-Holstein eG

www.rsheg.de

Zucht- und Besamungsunion Hessen eG

www.zbh.de

Osnabrücker Herdbuch eG

www.ohg-genetic.de

Verein Ostfriesischer Stammviehzüchter eG

www.vostov.de

Annual reports

www.unternehmensregister.de

Networks

Alpengenetik

www.alpengenetik.eu

Nord-Ost-Genetic

www.nog.de

Rinderallianz

www.rinderallianz.de

Additional companies

Besamungsstation Greifenberg

www.besamungsstation.eu

Besamungsverein Neustadt a.d. Aisch

www.bvn-online.de

Göpelgenetik

www.goepelgenetik.de

Holstein Austria

www.holstein.at

Rinderbesamungsgenossenschaft Memmingen

www.rbgmm.de

Rinderunion Baden-Württemberg e.V.

www.rind-bw.de

Rinderzucht Sachsen-Anhalt eG

www.rsaeg.de

Rinderzuchtverband Franken

www.rzv-franken.de

Vereinigung der Südtiroler Tierzuchtverbände

www.vstz.it

Zuchtverband Schwarzbunt Rotbunt Bayern

www.holstein-bayern.de

1.1 1.1 Factor Analysis

1.1.1 KMO- and Bartlett-Test

Degree of sample suitability according to Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin

0.626

Bartlett test for sphericity

Approximate chi-square

25.939

df

15

Significance according to Bartlett

0.039

1.1.2 Rotated Component Matrix

 

Component

1

2

Top cattle

0.712

0.591

Top sires

0.934

−0.038

Index value sires

0.484

−0.024

Index value cattle

−0.070

0.974

Top sires genomic

0.933

0.175

Index sires genomic

0.952

0.048

  1. Extraction method: principal component analysis. Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization. The rotation converged in three iterations

1.2 1.2 Discriminant Analysis for Cluster Solution 1

1.2.1 Wilks’ Lambda

Test of function(s)

Wilks’ Lambda

Chi-square

df

Significance

1

0.082

11.255

3

0.010

1.2.2 Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

 

Function

1

Innovation activity 1

1.825

Annual profit

−1.737

Cooperation intensity

1.713

1.3 1.3 Discriminant Analysis for Cluster Solution 2

1.3.1 Wilks’ Lambda

Test of function(s)

Wilks’ Lambda

Chi-square

df

Significance

1–2

0.002

12.312

6

0.055

2

0.069

5.346

2

0.069

1.3.2 Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

 

Function

1

2

Innovation activity 1

1.003

0.988

Annual profit

0.703

−0.593

Cooperation intensity

0.936

0.031

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Höhler, J., Kühl, R. (2017). Innovations in Cooperatively Organized Breeding Networks: Analysis of Cluster Structures in Dairy Cattle Breeding in Germany. In: Hendrikse, G., Cliquet, G., Ehrmann, T., Windsperger, J. (eds) Management and Governance of Networks . Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57276-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics