Abstract
This chapter sets out to provide an introduction to Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: European Perspectives on increasing female representation—Multiple approaches beyond quotas. We provide a rationale for focusing on the eight European countries; UK, Portugal, Slovenia, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland and Hungary as well as including an international outward looking chapter in this edited volume. These are all examples of countries that have not, to date, introduced quota regulations for private sector boards. Yet we acknowledge that although quotas have not been introduced in the respective countries, the majority of countries have some sort of initiatives in relation to increasing the share of women on boards and discussions are flourishing in academic, political and private sector circles. Nevertheless, we see great variations in the design and approach among the countries and we observe a wide range of enabling and hindering forces important to acknowledge in order to understand the different country contexts.
Since finalising this book: On 23 June 2017, Portugal approved the government proposal submitted in February with gender representation regulations (quotas) for both state-owned and listed companies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Doldor, E., Sealy, R., & Vinnicombe, S. (2016). Accidental activists: Headhunters as marginal diversity actors in institutional change towards more women on boards. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 285–303. http://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12107
European Commission. (2016). Data about boards in the largest publicly listed companies in European countries. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-decision-making/database/business-finance/supervisory-board-board-directors/index_en.htm. Last access: March 7, 2017.
Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study. Corporate Governance, 19(2), 116–135. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x
Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional complementarities and gender diversity on boards: A configurational approach. Corporate Governance (Oxford), 24(4), 406–427. http://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12140
Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2017). Women on boards: Beyond the institutional setting—The role of stakeholders and actors. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 289–315.
Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 55–63. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9656-1
Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R., & Lorenz, R. (2014). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 233–251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mensi-Klarbach, H., Seierstad, C., Gabaldon, P. (2017). Setting the Scene: Women on Boards: The Multiple Approaches Beyond Quotas. In: Seierstad, C., Gabaldon, P., Mensi-Klarbach, H. (eds) Gender Diversity in the Boardroom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57273-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57273-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57272-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57273-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)