Skip to main content

The Winner Effect—The Neuropsychology of Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Leadership Hubris Epidemic

Abstract

When considering the relationship between biology and behaviour we tend to think of the former as having causative effects on the latter. Yet the winner effect clearly illustrates that the reverse may also be the case. Winning—be it physically in battle, competitively in sport, or economically in the marketplace—markedly increases the likelihood that the winner will go on to prevail in a subsequent encounter. The biological underpinning of this phenomenon is thought to be related to the release from the brain into the bloodstream of a hormone that causes levels of circulating testosterone to rise. The changes that this can bring about in humans can be seen most readily in Hubris Syndrome, particularly when success has led to the acquisition of power, as that is when the effects of the extreme self-confidence that ensues are most likely to become apparent, and are often damaging to the welfare of individuals and organisations. In other species, such as the cichlid fish, testosterone release gives rise to changes in size and colour as well as temperament and fertility. The destructive effects that may be born of success and the acquisition of power are not inevitable, depending in some cases on pre-existing dispositions (powerful people who also feel inadequate are the most dangerous) biological differences (testosterone surges vary between individuals, and tend to be higher in males than in females) and the way in which the acquisition of power is experienced (either as a personal gain—‘P-power’, or a social opportunity—‘S-power’).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • BBC. (2005). Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2005/10_october/06/bush.shtm.

  • Bernhardt, P. C., et al. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior, 65(1), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boksem, M. A. S., Smolders, R., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Social power and approach-related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(5), 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chusmir, L. H. (1986). Personalized vs. socialized power needs among working women and men. Human Relations, 39(2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. M., & Herbert, J. (2008). Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(16), 6167–6172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J. (1992). Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 20(1), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, S. B. (2006). Personality and foreign policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq decisions. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fast, N. J., & Chen, S. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1406–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, R. D. (2003). How does behavior change the brain? Multiple methods to answer old questions. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 43(6), 771–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, P., et al. (2014). Linguistic biomarkers of Hubris Syndrome. Cortex, 55, 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getty, J. P. (2003). As I see it: the autobiography of J. Paul Getty. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1987). The neuropsychology of emotion and personality. In S. M. Stahl, S. D. Iverson, & E. C. Guinote (Eds.), Cognitive Neurochemistry (pp. 171–190). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunturkun, O. (2003). Human Hubris Syndrome: Adult persistence of head-turning asymmetry. Nature, 421, 711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusari, F. (2010). Predicting American presidential election outcomes based on candidates’ power, affiliation and achievement motives, in Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, H. G. (1951a). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: 1. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, H. G. (1951b). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: II. Some effects of possible social factors. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13, 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge: CUP Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A. L., Heimstra, N. W., & Damkot, D. K. (1968). Social modification of agonistic behaviour in fish. Animal Behaviour, 16(4), 437–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., & Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris syndrome: An acquired personality disorder? A study of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers over the last 100 years. Brain, 132(5), 1396–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rablen, M. D., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Mortality and immortality: The Nobel Prize as an experiment into the effect of status upon longevity. Journal of Health Economics, 27(6), 1462–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier, D. A., & Singh, S. M. (2001). Survival in Academy Award-winning actors and actresses. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(10), 955–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. (2012). The winner effect: How power affects your brain. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskes, M., et al. (2011). The right side? Under time pressure, approach motivation leads to right-oriented bias. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1403–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1938). Power: A new social analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C., Campbell, K. L., & McClelland, D. C. (1999). Implicit power motivation moderates men’s testosterone responses to imagined and real dominance success. Hormones and Behavior, 36(3), 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, J., et al. (2013). Dopamine-D2-receptor blockade reverses the association between trait approach motivation and frontal asymmetry in an approach-motivation context. Psychological Science, 24(4), 489–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1973). The Power Motive. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, M. M., Welsh, K. M., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2006). Salivary cortisol changes in humans after winning or losing a dominance contest depend on implicit power motivation. Hormones and Behavior, 49(3), 346–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robertson, I.H. (2018). The Winner Effect—The Neuropsychology of Power. In: Garrard, P. (eds) The Leadership Hubris Epidemic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57255-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics