Advertisement

A Rights Framework for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions in Africa

  • Enyinna Nwauche
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I argue that fundamental human and peoples’ rights protection will significantly enhance both the negative and positive protection of traditional cultural expressions. The protection of traditional cultural expressions under the banner of human and peoples’ rights significantly enhances the capacity of communities to act as legal subjects in the protection of their rights. The analysis of the negative protection of traditional cultural expressions revealed an attenuated capacity of communities in African states to protect their traditional cultural expressions because the protective framework is, in the main, facilitated by national institutions. Communities are therefore hampered in their ability to protect their traditional cultural expressions. A peoples’ and human rights framework acknowledges the entitlement of communities to protect their traditional cultural expressions and therefore complements the legislative models for the positive and negative protection of folklore. A peoples’ and human rights framework acts as a default standard that, at the very least, will guide and enhance legislative development. The proposition that this chapter explores is that traditional cultural expressions can be protected indirectly through both collective rights and a number of specific human rights. This proposition is based on the principle that only individuals can directly enforce human rights. The fact that communities can enforce rights directly to protect traditional cultural expressions is an emerging idea that is not generally accepted. The focus of this chapter is primarily the Bill of Rights in the national constitutions of the African states, as well as extant jurisprudence.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Human Dignity African State Fundamental Freedom African Charter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aboki, Y. (1991–1992). Are some Nigerian customary laws really repugnant. ABU Law Journal, 9–10, 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Achimu, W. A. (1976). Valid criterion of validity for customary law. Nigerian Law Journal, 10, 35–55.Google Scholar
  3. Adam, A. H. (2012). Recognising sacred natural sites and territories in Kenya: An analysis of how the Kenya Constitution, National and International Laws can support the recognition of sacred natural sites and their community governance systems. Institute of Culture and Ecology, African Biodiversity Network and the Gaia Foundation Kenya.Google Scholar
  4. Adewoye, O. (1977). The judicial system in southern Nigeria, 1854–1954: Law and justice in a dependency. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Agbede, I. O. (1993). Repugnancy clause as an instrument of legal development: Myth or substance. In T. O. Elias & M. I. Jegede (Eds.), Nigerian essays in jurisprudence (pp. 407–431). Lagos, Nigeria: MIJ Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Ajayi, F. A. (1960). The interaction of English law with customary law in western Nigeria II. Journal of African Law, 4, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alexy, R., & Rivers, J. (2009). A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Allott, A. N. (1970). New essays in African law. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  9. Allott, A. N. (1977). The people as law-makers: Custom, practice, and public opinion as sources of law in Africa and England. Journal of African Law, 21, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Amoah, J., & Bennett, T. (2008). The freedoms of religion and culture under the South African Constitution: Do traditional African religions enjoy equal treatment? African Human Rights Law Journal, 8, 357–375.Google Scholar
  11. Asakitikpi, A. O. (2007). Functions of hand woven textiles among Yoruba women in Southwestern Nigeria. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 17, 101–115.Google Scholar
  12. Asein, J. O. (1994). Consumer literacy and confusing similarity of pictorial trademarks in Nigeria. Trademark Report, 84, 64–78.Google Scholar
  13. Barnard-Naudé, A. J. (2008). ‘Oh what a tangled web weave…’ hegemony, freedom of contract, good faith and transformation-towards a politics of friendship in the politics of contract. Constitutional Court Review, 1, 155–208.Google Scholar
  14. Bennett, T. W. (1995). Human rights and African customary law under the South African Constitution. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.Google Scholar
  15. Bennett, T. W. (2004). Customary law in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, T. W. (2010). The cultural defence and the custom of Thwala in South African law. University of Botswana Law Journal, 10, 3–26.Google Scholar
  17. Beukes, M. (2009). A tug of war between heritage conservation and property rights: Some success at last for heritage conservation – City of Cape Town v Oudekraal Estates (Pty) Ltd [2007] JOL 20087 (C). International Journal of Cultural Property, 16, 67–83.Google Scholar
  18. Bhana, D. (2007). The law of contract and the constitution: Napier v Barkhuizen SCA. South African Law Journal, 124, 269–280.Google Scholar
  19. Bilchitz, D. (2011). Should religious associations be allowed to discriminate? South African Journal on Human Rights, 27, 219–248.Google Scholar
  20. Bilchitz, D. (2012). Why courts should not sanction unfair discrimination in the private sphere: A reply. South African Journal on Human Rights: Religion and Human Rights, 28, 296–315.Google Scholar
  21. Blocher, J. (2006). Building on custom: Land tenure policy and economic development in Ghana. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 9, 166–202.Google Scholar
  22. Boateng, B. (2006). Square pegs in round holes? Cultural production, intellectual property frameworks and discourses of power. In R. A. Ghosh (Ed.), CODE: Collaborative ownership and the digital economy (pp. 61–74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Botha, H. (2004). Freedom and constraint in constitutional adjudication. South African Journal on Human Rights, 20, 249–283.Google Scholar
  24. Brand, F. D. J. (2009). The role of good faith, equity and fairness in the South African law of contract: The influence of the common law and the constitution. South African Law Journal, 126, 71–90.Google Scholar
  25. Brown, M. F. (2005). Heritage trouble: Recent work on the protection of intangible cultural property. International Journal of Cultural Property, 12, 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Buchanan, A. (1993). The role of collective rights in the theory of indigenous peoples’ rights. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 3, 89–108.Google Scholar
  27. Chapman, A. (2001). Approaching intellectual property as a human right: Obligations related to Article 15(1(c). e-Copyright Bulletin. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://portal.unesco.org/cu;ture/en/ev.php-URL_ID=25704&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.htm
  28. Chapman, A. R. (2002). The human rights implications of intellectual property protection. Journal of International Economic Law, 5, 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cheadle, H., & Davis, D. (1997). The application of the 1996 Constitution in the private sphere. South African Journal on Human Rights, 13, 44–66.Google Scholar
  30. Conway, D. M. (2009). Indigenizing intellectual property: Customary law, legal pluralism and the protection of indigenous peoples’ rights, identity and resources. Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 15, 207–256.Google Scholar
  31. Currie, I. (2012). Balancing and limitation of rights in the South African Constitution. In S. Woolman & D. Biltchitz (Eds.), Is this seat taken? Conversations at the bar, the bench and the academy about the South African Constitution (pp. 251–265). Pretoria, South Africa: Pretoria University Law Press.Google Scholar
  32. Currie, I., & De Waal, J. (2005). The Bill of Rights handbook (5th ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.Google Scholar
  33. De Freitas, S. (2012). Freedom of association as a foundational right: Religious associations and Strydom v Nederduitse Gereformeerde Gemeente, Moreleta Park. South African Journal on Human Rights: Religion and Human Rights, 28, 258–272.Google Scholar
  34. Dean, O. H. (1997). The case for the recognition of intellectual property in the Bill of Rights. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 60, 105–119.Google Scholar
  35. Donnelly, J. (1990). Human rights, individual rights and collective rights. In J. Berting, P. R. Baeher, J. Herman Burgers, C. Flinterman, B. De Klerk, R. Kroes, et al. (Eds.), Human rights in a pluralist world: Individuals and collectivities (pp. 39–62). Westport, CT: Meckler.Google Scholar
  36. du Bois, M. (2013). Recognition and protection of traditional knowledge interests as property in South African Law. European Property Law Journal, 2, 144–170.Google Scholar
  37. Elias, T. O. (1972). Towards a common law in Nigeria. In T. O. Elias (Ed.), Law and social change in Nigeria (pp. 254–273). Lagos, Nigeria: University of Lagos Press.Google Scholar
  38. Geiger, C. (2008). The constitutional dimension of intellectual property. In P. L. C. Torremans (Ed.), Intellectual Property and human rights: Enhanced edition of Copyright and human rights (pp. 101–131). Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  39. Glover, G. (2007). Lazarus in the constitutional court: An exhumation of the excepto doli generalis?: Note. South African Law Journal, 124, 449–459.Google Scholar
  40. Gyasi, E. A. (1994). The adaptability of African communal land tenure to economic opportunity: The example of land acquisition for oil palm in Ghana. Africa: Journal of International Africa Institute, 64, 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hawthorne, L. (2004). Closing the open norms in the law of Contract. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 67, 294–302.Google Scholar
  42. Helfer, L. R. (2003). Human rights and intellectual property: Conflict or coexistence? Minnesota Intellectual Property Review, 5, 47–61.Google Scholar
  43. Helfer, L. R. (2006). Toward a human rights framework for intellectual property. University of California Davis Law Review, 40, 971–1020.Google Scholar
  44. Helfer, L. R. (2008). The new innovation frontier: Intellectual property and the European Court of Human Rights. Harvard International Law Journal, 49, 1–52.Google Scholar
  45. Helfer, L. R., & Austin, G. (2011). Human rights and intellectual property: Mapping the global interface. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Himonga, C., & Bosch, C. (2000). The application of African Customary Law under the Constitution of South Africa: Problems solved or just beginning? South African Law Journal, 117, 306–341.Google Scholar
  47. Hopkins, K. (2003). The influence of the Bill of Rights on the enforcement of contracts. De Rebus, 8, 23.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, P. (1999). Human rights, group rights and peoples’ rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 21, 80–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kerr, A. J. (2008). The defence of unfair conduct on the part of the plaintiff at the time the action is brought: The exceptio doli generalis and the replicatio doli in modern law: Notes. South African Law Journal, 125, 241–248.Google Scholar
  50. Kuruk, P. (1999). Protecting folklore under modern intellectual property regimes: A reappraisal of the tensions between individual and communal rights in Africa and the United States. American University Law Review, 48, 769–849.Google Scholar
  51. Kuruk, P. (2002). African customary law and the protection of folklore. e-Copyright Bulletin, XXXVI.Google Scholar
  52. Kwall, R. R. (2012). Is the Jewish tradition intellectual property. WIPO Journal, 4, 129.Google Scholar
  53. Lenta, P. (2009). Taking diversity seriously: Religious associations and work-related discrimination. South African Law Journal, 126, 827–860.Google Scholar
  54. Lenta, P. (2012). The right of religious associations to discriminate. South African Journal on Human Rights: Religion and Human Rights, 28, 231–257.Google Scholar
  55. Lenta, P. (2013). In defence of the right of religious associations to discriminate: A reply to Bilchitz and De Freitas. South African Journal on Human Rights, 29, 429–447.Google Scholar
  56. Lynch, G. (2012). Becoming indigenous in pursuit of justice: The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the Endorois. African Affairs, 111, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milo, D. (2012). It’s hard for me to say I’m sorry: Apology as a remedy in the South African Law of Defamation. Journal of Media Law, 4, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mutua wa, M. (1994). The Banjul charter and the African cultural fingerprint: An evaluation of the language of duties. Virginia Journal of International Law, 35, 339–380.Google Scholar
  59. Ndoye, B. (1989). Protection of expressions of folklore in Senegal. Copyright Monthly Bulletin of the World Intellectual Property Organisation, 25, 374–375.Google Scholar
  60. Neethling, J., Potgieter, J. M., & Visser, P. J. (1996). Neethling’s law of personality. Durban, South Africa: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  61. Nordenfeldt, J. (1987). Human rights – What they are and what they are not. Nordic Journal of International Law, 35, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nwauche, E. S. (2005). The protection of expressions of folklore through the Bill of Rights in South Africa. Script-ed, 125–162. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/script-ed/vol2-2/folklore.asp
  63. Nwauche, E. S. (2008). The judicial construction of the public interest in South African copyright law. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 39, 917–942.Google Scholar
  64. Nwauche, E. S. (2009). Distinction without difference: The constitutional protection of customary law and cultural linguistic and religious communities – A comment on Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 59, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nwauche, E. S. (2010). The Nigerian fundamental rights (enforcement) procedure rules 2009: A fitting response to problems in the enforcement of human rights in Nigeria? African Human Rights Law Journal, 10, 502–514.Google Scholar
  66. Obilade, A. O. (1979). The Nigerian legal system. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar
  67. Ochich, G. (2006). The withering province of customary law in Kenya. In J. Fenrich, P. Galizzi, & T. E. Higgins (Eds.), The future of African customary law (pp. 58–80). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Osibanjo, Y., & Osipitan, T. (1991). Proof of customary law in non-customary courts. In Y. Osibanjo & A. Kalu (Eds.), Towards a restatement of Nigerian customary laws (pp. 255–267). Lagos, Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  69. Ouguergouz, F. (2003). The African Charter on human and peoples’ rights: A comprehensive agenda for human dignity and sustainable democracy in Africa. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  70. Pentassuglia, G. (2010). Indigenous groups and the developing jurisprudence of the African Commission on human and peoples’ rights: Some reflections. UCL Human Rights Review, 3, 150–163.Google Scholar
  71. Pentney, W. (1987). The aboriginal rights provisions in the Constitution Act, 1982. Saskatoon, Canada: Native Law Centre.Google Scholar
  72. Pienaar, G. (2008). The inclusivity of communal land tenure: A redefinition of ownership in Canada and South Africa. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 117. Available at www.ejcl.org/121/art121-19.pdf
  73. Ramcharan, B. G. (1993). Individual, collective and group rights: History, theory, practice and contemporary evolution. International Journal on Group Rights, 1, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rautenbach, C. (2011). Umkhosi Ukweshwana: Revival of a Zulu festival in celebration. In T. W. Bennett (Ed.), Traditional African religions in South African law (pp. 63–89). UCT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rautenbach, I. M. (2011). Constitution and contract: The application of the Bill of Rights to contractual clauses and their enforcement: Bredenkamp v Standard Bank of SA Ltd 2010 9 BCLR 892 (SCA). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, 74, 510–524.Google Scholar
  76. Sieghart, P. (1983). The international law of human rights. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  77. Srinivas, K. R. (2007). Intellectual property rights and traditional knowledge: The case of Yoga. Economic and Political Weekly, 8, 2866–2871.Google Scholar
  78. Symonides, J. (1998). Cultural rights: A neglected category of human rights. International Social Science Journal, 50, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tladi, D. D. (2002a). Breathing constitutional values into the law of contract: Freedom of contract and the constitution. De Jure, 35, 306–317.Google Scholar
  80. Tladi, D. D. (2002b). One step forward, two steps back for constitutionalising the common law: Afrox Health Care v Strydom. South African Public Law, 17, 473–478.Google Scholar
  81. Torremans, P. (2004). Copyright as a human right. In P. Torremans (Ed.), Copyright and human rights: Freedom of expression, intellectual property, privacy (pp. 1–20). The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  82. Tushnet, R. (2004). Copy this essay: How fair use doctrine harms free speech and how copying serves it. Yale Law Journal, 114, 535–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Boven, T. (1986). The relations between peoples’ rights and human rights in the African Charter. Human Rights Law Journal, 7, 2–4.Google Scholar
  84. Van Boven, T. (1995). Human rights and rights of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 6, 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wachira, G. M. (2010). Application of indigenous peoples’ customary law to protect their land rights in Africa. Indigenous Affairs, 1–2, 6–15.Google Scholar
  86. Wanjala, S. C. (2000). Land ownership and use in Kenya: Past present and future. In S. C. Wanjala (Ed.), Essays on land law: The reform debate in Kenya (pp. 25–44). Nairobi, Kenya: Faculty of Law, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
  87. Woodman, G. R. (1996). Customary land law in Ghanaian courts. Accra, Ghana: Ghana University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Woolman, S. (2009). On the fragility of associational life: A constitutive liberal’s response to Patrick Lenta. South African Journal on Human Rights, 25, 280–305.Google Scholar
  89. Woolman, S. (2012). Seek justice elsewhere: An egalitarian pluralist's reply to David Bilchitz on the distinction between differentiation and domination. South African Journal on Human Rights: Religion and Human Rights, 28, 273–295.Google Scholar
  90. Woolman, S., & Davis, D. (1996). The last laugh: Du Plessis v De Klerk, classical liberalism, Creole liberalism and the application of fundamental rights under the Interim and final Constitutions. South African Journal on Human Rights, 12, 361–404.Google Scholar
  91. Yu, P. K. (2007). Reconceptualising intellectual property interests in a human rights framework. University of California Davis Law Review, 40, 1039–1149.Google Scholar
  92. Yu, P. K. (2012). Intellectual property and human rights in the nonmultilateral era. Florida Law Review, 64, 1045–1100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enyinna Nwauche
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawRhodes University GrahamstownGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations