Skip to main content

Astronomy Education Research in the Planetarium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 474 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Astronomy ((BRIEFSASTRON))

Abstract

From the first moment intervening clouds obscured the beauty of the overhead stars, our ancestral sky watchers created pictures and maps to represent the heavens. For some, precise star positions were needed for navigation and wayfinding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bishop, J. E. (1976). Planetarium methods based on the research of Jean Piaget. Science and Children, 13(8), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazell, B. D. (2009). Planetarium instructional efficacy: A research synthesis. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, N. J., & Lauck, G. M. (1972). Planetarium instruction–using an open-sky test. Science Teacher, 39(5), 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., Zuckerman, H., Groen, J. A., & Brucker, S. M. (2009). Educating scholars: Doctoral education in the humanities. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1985). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teachsing (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1980). Traditional planetarium programming versus participatory planetarium programming. School Science and Mathematics, 80(3), 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, N. (I989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Teachers College Record, 91(2), 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, R. J.,Jr., (1999). A national survey of planetarium directors operating public-school-owned planetaria. Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, D. B. (1970). A comparison of a directed laboratory versus an enquiry laboratory versus a non-laboratory approach to general education college astronomy. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. L. (1993). Visual design in the planetarium. Art, Science & Literacy: Selected Readings from the 24th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 49. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, G. L., & Bruce, M. H. (1982). Student achievement and attitudes in astronomy: An experimental comparison of two planetarium programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 53–61.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • “Planetariums of the World.” www.ips-planetarium.org. International Planetarium Society, 28 August 2015. Web: 5 May 2016.

  • NCES. (2015). the condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144), english language learners. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, C. C. (2003). The birth and evolution of the planetarium. In Information handling in astronomy-historical vistas (pp. 233–247). Springer: Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. D. (2006). Students’ development of astronomy concepts across Time. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. D., Schmoll, S., Yu, K. C., & Ghent, C. (2015). A guide to conducting educational research in the planetarium. Planetarian, 44(2), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1970). Is the planetarium a more effective teaching device than the combination of the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe? School Science and Mathematics, 70(6), 487–492.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1973). The planetarium versus the classroom—an inquiry into earlier implications. School Science and Mathematics, 73(7), 553–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G., & Campbell, J. R. (1972). A comparison of the effectiveness of the planetarium and the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe in the teaching of specific astronomical concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 72(5), 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridky, R. W. (1975). The mystique effect of the planetarium. School Science and Mathematics, 75(6), 505–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1989). Dark sky legacy: Astronomy’s impact on the history of culture. Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. (1994). Who in the hell needs a planetarium? Planetarian, 23(1), 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, R. (1991). Planetarium education: A review of the literature. The Planetarian, 20(3), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemergy, J. C. (1967). An experimental study of the effectiveness of a planetarium in teaching selected astronomical phenomena to sixth-grade children. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, D., & Lawson, A. E. (1976). Effective astronomy teaching: intellectual development and its implications. Mercury, 5(4), 6–13.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T. F. (2000). K-12 astronomy benchmarks from project 2061. The Physics Teacher, 38(9), 538–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, T. F. (2015). Is the best astronomy education research ‘grey’? Retrieved from the AstroLrner blog at: https://astronomyfacultylounge.wordpress.com/2015/09/24/is-the-best-astronomy-education-research-grey/

  • Slater, S. J., Slater, T. F., Heyer, I., & Bailey, J. M. (2015). Conducting Astronomy Education Research: An Astronomers’ Guide, (2nd Ed.). Hilo, Hawai’i: Pono Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. J.,Tatge, C. B., Schleigh, S. P., Slater, T. F., Bretones, P. S., McKinnon, D., & Heyer, I. (2016). iSTAR First light: Characterizing astronomy education research dissertations in the iSTAR database. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 3(2), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. A. (1966). An experimental comparison of two techniques (planetarium lecture-demonstration and classroom lecture-demonstration) of teaching selected astronomical concepts to sixth grade students. Ed.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. V. (1974). The planetarium in education: A review of the literature. Nova University. Retrieved from ERIC at http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED111658.pdf

  • Sneider, C. I., Eason, L. P., & Friedman, A. J. (1979). Summative evaluations of participatory science exhibit. Science Education, 63(1), 25–36.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, M. (1988). Focus on education spatial ability, science, and sex. Planetarian, 17(4), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, M. S. (1989). The effect of a combination of planetarium and laboratory instruction in the improvement of student spatial ability. Planetarian, 18(3), 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, J. J. (1967, October). The planetarium and science education. Projector-Publication of the Great Lakes Planetarium Association, 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. W. (1973). The Planetarium in Education: An Experimental Study of the Attainment of Perceived Goals. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. W. (1976). Analysis of research on the educational uses of a planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13(4), 345–349.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, D. E. (1965). Effects of the use of the planetarium upon the development of spatial concepts among selected sixth grade students in Elgin (Master’s thesis), Northern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, D. E. (1967, October). Elgin’s research in planetarium curriculum. Projector-Publication of the Great Lakes Planetarium Association, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneking, G. E. (1970). Planetarium education in the 1970’s—Time for assessment. The Science Teacher, 37(7), 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. L. C. (1968). Effectiveness of the planetarium and different methods of its utilization in teaching astronomy. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R. (2005). Planetarium paradigm shift. Planetarian, 34(3), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slater, T.F., Tatge, C.B. (2017). Astronomy Education Research in the Planetarium. In: Research on Teaching Astronomy in the Planetarium. SpringerBriefs in Astronomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57202-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics