Thermomechanical Deformation of Complex Workpieces in Milling and Drilling Processes

  • B. DenkenaEmail author
  • P. Maaß
  • A. Schmidt
  • D. Niederwestberg
  • J. Vehmeyer
  • C. Niebuhr
  • P. Gralla
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)


In this chapter the work of an interdisciplinary collaboration for modeling thermomechanical deformations in dry milling and drilling processes is presented. The simulation based approach allows the prediction of structural workpiece deformation due to thermal effects occurring during the machining process. Geometric changes of the workpiece volume and the current engagement of tool and workpiece are included in the developed model. The model is applied for the optimization of NC paths with respect to workpiece deformations. The combined model is assembled by individual sub-models, which are coupled to account for interactions with each other. A dexel model is applied for contact zone analysis of tool and workpiece and also allows efficient geometric modeling of the workpiece surface. Geometric process variables of the contact zone are passed to the process model which provides thermal and mechanical loads for the thermomechanics. The thermomechanical behaviour is numerically approximated using finite elements on the time depending co-domain of the dexel model together with thermal and mechanical loads provided by the process model. In all, a closed loop between Boolean material removal, process forces, heat flux and thermo-elastic deformation is established and allows an accurate prediction of workpiece deformation and shape deviations. Furthermore, the simulation operates as a forward model for an NC path optimization. A significant improvement of form deviation is achieved with the approach.



The presented results have been obtained within the research project “Thermomechanical Deformation of Complex Workpieces in Drilling and Milling Processes” (DE 447/90-3, MA 1657/21-3) within the DFG Priority Program 1480 “Modeling, Simulation and Compensation of Thermal Effects for Complex Machining Processes”. The authors would like to thank the DFG for its financial and organizational support of the project.


  1. 1.
    Kersting, P., Biermann, D.: Modeling techniques for the prediction of workpiece deflections in NC milling. Proc. CIRP 2, 83–86 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bono, M.: Jun Ni: the effects of thermal distortions on the diameter and cylindricity of dry drilled holes. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 41(15), 2261–2270 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Isbilir, O., Elaheh, G.: Finite element analysis of drilling of titanium alloy. Proc. Eng. 10, 1877–1882 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zimmermann, M., et al.: Analysis of thermo-mechanical effects on the machining accuracy when turning aluminium alloys (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleischer, J., Pabst, R., Kelemen, S.: Heat flow simulation for dry machining of power train castings. CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technol. 56(1), 117–122 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neugebauer, R., et al.: Thermal interactions between the process and workpiece. Proc. CIRP 4, 63–66 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt, C.: Einflussgrössensensitive Simulation und Überwachung von Fräsprozessen., Dr.-Ing. Dissertation, Leibniz Universitt Hannover, PZH Produktionstechnisches Zentrum (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Denkena, B., Schmidt, C., Krüger, M.: Experimental investigation and modeling of thermal and mechanical influences on shape deviations in machining structural parts. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 50(11), 1015–1021 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Surmann, T., et al.: Simulation of the temperature distribution in NC-milled workpieces. Adv. Mater. Res. 223, 222–230 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Niederwestberg, D., Denkena, B.: Simulation of thermal and mechanical workpiece load. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 7(4), 315–323 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Denkena, B., Vehmeyer, J., Niederwestberg, D., Maaß, P.: Identification of the specific cutting force for geometrically defined cutting edges and varying cutting conditions. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 42–49 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Luttervelt, A., et al.: Present situation and future trends in modelling of machining operations progress R. CIRP Annals—Manuf. Technol., 47, 587–626 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Altintas, Y.: Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. Cambridge university press (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, A., Siebert, K.G.: Design of Adaptive Finite Element Software: The Finite Element Toolbox ALBERTA. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niebuhr, C., Niederwestberg, D., Schmidt, A.: Finite element simulation of macroscopic machining processes—implementation of time dependent Domain and Boundary Conditions, University of Bremen, ZeTeM-Report 14-01 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Denkena, B., Schmidt, A., Henjes, J., Niederwestberg, D., Niebuhr, C.: Modeling a thermomechanical NC-simulation. Proc. CIRP 8, 69–74 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denkena, B., Schmidt, A., Maaß, P., Niederwestberg, D., Niebuhr, C., Vehmeyer, J.: Prediction of temperature induced shape deviations in dry milling. Proc. CIRP 31, 340–345 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Denkena, B., Niederwestberg, D.: Tool path adaption for compensation of thermal workpiece deflections based on virtual machining. In: 4th international conference on virtual machining process technology (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lagarias, J.C., Reeds, J.A., Wright, M.H., Wright, P.E.: Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. 9(1), 112–147 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Denkena
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Maaß
    • 2
  • A. Schmidt
    • 2
  • D. Niederwestberg
    • 1
  • J. Vehmeyer
    • 2
  • C. Niebuhr
    • 2
  • P. Gralla
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Production Engineering and Machine ToolsLeibniz Universität HannoverGarbsenGermany
  2. 2.Center for Industrial MathematicsUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations