Skip to main content

Understanding “Sustainability” and Attitudes of Students to the Concept of “Sustainable Development” in China and the UK

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability, Green IT and Education Strategies in the Twenty-first Century

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 1203 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is an investigation into the way(s) that words and phrases such as, “sustainability” and “the environment” are used within China and the UK. It is a comparative analysis of responses from 18 to 21 year old students of Architecture in both countries – carried out by questionnaire sampling of students from both regions – and provides an initial assessment of the extent and possible meaning of any key differences in understanding of these terms. The discourse on sustainability is well-established in the UK but is not regularly taught as mainstream in Chinese universities, and yet many tutors, lecturers and practitioners educated outside China who are employed or guest lecture in our particular joint China-British university (and evidence shows that this also happens in other Chinese universities) are bringing a Western educational language of sustainability to Chinese students. In my experience, this has led to some discussion among students and this paper – concerning itself with issues related to sustainability – is the start of a wider assessment of social, cultural, practical and political differences in the classroom: in the West and in China. Drawing on a comparison of student responses from one Chinese university and three academically comparable universities in the UK – including questionnaire responses from 115 students studying in UK and 321 students studying in China (436 respondents in total), I examine their understanding of sustainability that might facilitate the use of these concepts more meaningfully. My findings indicate that there are clear disparities between students in China and UK reflecting a different understanding of expectations, settings and context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altomonte S (2010) Environmental education for sustainable architecture, review of European studies. Can Cent Sci Educ 1(2):12–21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aureli PV (2013) Less is enough: on architecture and asceticism. Strelka, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer JR (2006) Forging environmentalism: justice, livelihood, and contested environments. ME Sharpe, New York, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bell ML, Davis DL (2001) Reassessment of the lethal London fog of 1952: novel indicators of acute and chronic consequences of acute exposure to air pollution. Environ Health Perspectives 109(Suppl 3):389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Ami D (2010) Ferraris for all: in defence of economic progress. Policy, London, p xi

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bramall R (2011) Dig for victory! Anti-consumerism, austerity and new historical subjectivities. Critical Psychol 4(1):68–86

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breakthrough Institute (2011) Dialogue 3: modernizing environmentalism and conservation. In: Modernizing liberalism: breakthrough dialogue 2011. Sausalito, California. 16 Jun 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown C et al (2002) The pressures of industry on the Chinese environment: a tale of two South China Cities. NSF/REU Program-Society and Environment in South China. p 2

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brubaker R (2012) China and sustainability: connecting the dots between economy and ecology, The Guardian, 10 Sep 2012

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brundtland GH et al (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. General Assembly. World Commission on Environment and Development. Annex A/42/427

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carson R (1963) The silent spring of Rachel Carson. CBS Reports, CBS (Columbia Broadcasting Service), Season 4, Episode 14, New York, USA. TV documentary

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chan CK et al (2008) Social policy in China: development and well-being. Policy, Bristol, p 126

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chan G et al (2011) China engages global governance: a new world order in the making? Routledge, London, p 228

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. DEFRA (2015) 2010 to 2015 government policy: environmental quality. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs. London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Domes J, Näth ML (1977) China after the cultural revolution: politics between two party Congresses. J Asian Stud 37(03):530–553. May 1978

    Google Scholar 

  16. Donald JW, Davis CW (2009) Carbon dioxide: harmless, ubiquitous, and certainly not a pollutant under a liability policy’s absolute pollution exclusio. Seton Hall Law Rev 39(10):107–127

    Google Scholar 

  17. Economist (2015) Airpocalypse, http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/02/india-v-china/. Accessed 18 Feb 2016

  18. Edmonds R (2012) Patterns of China’s lost harmony: a survey of the country’s environmental degradation and protection. Routledge, London, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  19. Faber N et al (2005) The sustainability of “sustainability” – a study into the conceptual foundations of the notion of “sustainability”. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 7:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Furedi F (2003) Therapy culture: cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. Routledge, London, p 256

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman DSG (2014) Class in contemporary China. Polity, London, p 27

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goodman DSG (2008) The new rich in China future rulers, present lives. Routledge, London, p xii

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gray RH (2010) Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account Organizations Soc 35(1):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grumbine RE (2010) Where the dragon meets the angry river: nature and power in the People’s Republic of China. Island, Washington, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haas T, Olsson K (2014) Emergent urbanism: urban planning & design in times of structural and systemic change. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, p 110

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harari O, Beaty D (1990) On the folly of relying solely on a questionnaire methodology in cross-cultural research. J Manag Issues 2(3):267–281

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hilton I (2011) China’s Green Revolution: Energy, Environment and the 12th Five-Year Plan, Available via chinadialogue reports, www.chinadialogue.net/reports. Accessed 23 Feb 2015

  28. Holslag J (2010) China’s scepticism of clean energy champion Europe. Int Spectator Italian J Int Aff 45(1):75–89

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hornsby A (2012) The good analyst: impact measurement and analysis in the social-purpose universe. Investing for Good, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hua Y (2014) China waits for an apology, New York Times, 9 Apr 2014

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huesemann M, Huesemann J (2011) Techno-Fix: why technology won’t save us or the environment. New Society Publishers, British Columbia, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jasanoff S (2001) Image and imagination: the formation of global enviromental consciousness. In: Edwards P (ed) Changing the atmosphere. MIT, Cambridge, USA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jing L (2013) Pollution-free days of Beijing Olympics now just a happy memory, South China Morning Post, 10 Aug 2013

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johnston P et al (2005) Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res Intl J 14:60–66

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kekic L (2007) The world in 2007: democracy index. The Economist Intelligence Unit

    Google Scholar 

  36. KPMG Advisory. (2011). China’s 12th Five-Year Plan: Healthcare sector. http://www.kpmg.com/cn/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/China-12th-FiveYear-Plan-Healthcare-201105-3.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2015

  37. Larson J (1993) Elegant technology. J Econ Issues 27:421–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee JCK, Tilbury D (1998) Changing environments: the challenge for environmental education in China. Geography 83:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lee K, Holland A, McNeill D (2000) Global sustainable development in the twenty-first century. Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, pp 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lehoux P (2006) The problem of health technology: policy implications for modern health care systems. Taylor & Francis, London, p xxix

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lewis P (2011) From ego to eco: architecture’s new ‘ecosophy’. In: Williams A, Dounas T (eds) Masterplanning the future: modernism, east, west and across the world. TRG Publications, London, pp 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li K (2012) Promoting coordinated urbanization – an important strategic choice for achieving modernization. http://static.squarespace.com/static/541ff5f5e4b02b7c37f31ed6/5429942de4b0455e57050a1b/542994cde4b0455e570531a1/1412011213445/Li-Keqiang-China-urbanization-speech.pdf. Accessed 9 Sep 2012

  43. Liu JQ (2011) Reining in China’s energy targets. In: China’s Green Revolution: Energy, Environment and the 12th Five-Year Plan. China Dialogue. p 24

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu XZ, Wang JL (1991) An introduction to China’s health care system. J Public Health Policy 12(1):104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lovelock J, Margulis L (1974) Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia hypothesis. Tellus 26:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lovelock J (2007) The revenge of Gaia: Earth’s climate in crisis and the fate of humanity. Basic Books, New York, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  47. McGregor A, Roberts C (2003) Using the SPeAR assessment tool in sustainable master planning. In: US Green Building Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moseley S (2002) The big smoke: fifty years after the 1952 London smog. Brunei Gallery, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 9–10 Dec 2002

    Google Scholar 

  49. NDRC (2012) The People’s Republic of China’s report on sustainable development. National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  50. Newton J, Freyfogle ET (2005) Sustainability: a dissent. Conservation Biology 19:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ohashi T (2009) Democracy as the indicator of sustainability – from the research of ‘Questionnaire on Ideal Society Part II’ in Japan and Sweden. Reitaku Int J Econ Stud 17:9

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rees M (2004) Our final hour: a scientist’s warning: how terror, error, and environmental disaster threaten humankind’s future in this century – on earth and beyond. Basic Books, New York, p 116

    Google Scholar 

  53. RIBA (2014) The Brits who built the modern world. Royal Institute of British Architects, London, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  54. Robertson T (2012) The Malthusian Moment: global population growth and the birth of American environmentalism. Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sachs J (2007) Lecture 2: Survival in the Anthropocene. Available via Reith Lectures BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2007/lecture2.shtml. Accessed 18 Apr 2007

  56. Sánchez MJ, Lafuente R (2010) Defining and measuring environmental consciousness. Revista Internacional de Sociología (RIS) 68:731–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schwartz J (2004) Environmental NGOs in China: roles and limits. Pac Aff 77:28–49

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schwerin E (2012) China and a sustainable future: green growth and sustainable public procurement policies and strategies. In: International Public Procurement Conference Conference Proceedings, Part V: Sustainable and Green Procurement. p 3534

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shihping K-H, Wang Y-L (2013) A comparative study of sustainability management education in China and the USA. Environ Educ Res 19:64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Singh A (2013) The sustainability consortium extends its reach to China. GreenBiz. 20 Sep 2013

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tregidga H (2007) Power and politics of organisational sustainable development: an analysis of organisational reporting discourse (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. http://hdl.handle.net/10523/516. Accessed 20 Aug 2015

  62. Tregidga H, Milne MJ and Kearins K (2011) Sustainable development as a floating signifier: recognising space for resistance. Launceston, Australia: The 10th Australasian Conference on Social and Environmental Accounting Research, 5–7 Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  63. UK Contractors Group (2012) Construction in the UK Economy: the benefits of investment, UK Contractors Group. p 3

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ulanowics RE (2000) Toward the measurement of ecological integrity. In: Pimentel D, Westra L, Noss F (eds) Ecological integrity: integrating environment, conservation, and health. Island, Washington, p 99

    Google Scholar 

  65. UN (2015) Decade of education for sustainable development, mission. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/education-for-sustainable-development/mission/ Accessed 21 Jul 2015

  66. UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda For Global Action – final draft of the outcome document for the UN Summit to adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Goal 12. All Permanent Representatives and Permanent Observers to the United Nations. 8 Jul 2015

    Google Scholar 

  67. Universitas 21 (2009) Statement on sustainability. The Network for Internationsl Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  68. van Someren TCR, van Someren-Wang, S (2012) Green China: sustainable growth in east and west. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  69. Verheem R (2002) Recommendations for sustainability assessment in the Netherlands. In: Environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands: views from the Commission for EIA in 2002. Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment, the Netherlands. p 9

    Google Scholar 

  70. Whalley J, Xin X (2006) China’s Fdi and non-Fdi economies and the sustainability of future high Chinese growth. Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research. p 18

    Google Scholar 

  71. Williams A (2010) Corroding the curriculum: sustainability v. education. Acad Quest 23:70–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Williams D (2007) Sustainable design: ecology, architecture, and planning. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wong S-W, Tang B (2005) Challenges to the sustainability of development zone: a case study of Guangzhou Development District, China. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  74. Woods P (1996) Qualitative research. In: University of Plymouth Faculty of Education (ed) Study Guide for E835, Educational Research in Action. Open University, London

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wuebbles DJ (2012) Celebrating the ‘Blue Marble’. Eos 93:509–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Xueying Y (2014) Is environment ‘a city thing’ in China? Rural–urban differences in environmental attitudes. J Environ Psychol 38:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Yang G, Lam C-C, Wong N-Y (2010) Developing an instrument for identifying secondary teachers’ beliefs about education for sustainable development in China. J Environ Educ 41:195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Zelezny LC, Schultz PW (2000) Promoting environmentalism. J Soc Issues 56:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang J (2012) Delivering environmentally sustainable economic growth: the case of China. Asia Society, University of California. p 5

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zhang T (2010) From environment to sustainable development: China. Int Rev Educ 56:13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Austin Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, A. (2017). Understanding “Sustainability” and Attitudes of Students to the Concept of “Sustainable Development” in China and the UK. In: Issa, T., Isaias, P., Issa, T. (eds) Sustainability, Green IT and Education Strategies in the Twenty-first Century. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57070-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57070-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57068-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57070-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics