Skip to main content

A Methodology for Supporting Tutors Who Face Challenging Classes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classroom Behaviour Management in the Post-School Sector
  • 1092 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I will outline a strategy for supporting teachers outside the classroom in developing their ability to deal with disruptive student behaviour in their classes. I describe peer-reflective practice and demonstrate how this has been effective in impacting on helping teachers deal with disruptive groups. I explore a strategy for offering teachers support by sharing case studies of trainees’ classes where students were disruptive. Some epistemological questions are raised as to the problematic nature of how teachers know whether improvements take place when an intervention is made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Avis, J. (2002). Policing the subject: Learning outcomes, manageralism and research in PCET. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(1), 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1993). Through the lens of learning: How the visceral experience of learning reframes teaching. In D. Boud et al. (Eds.), Using experience for learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London/New York: Routledge and Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, I. (2002). Reflective teaching: Empirical research findings and some implications for teacher education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(2), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership: Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, N.E.A, 51(2), 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFE. (2012). Pupil behaviour in schools in England (DFE-RR218). https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/

  • Doyle, T. (2008). Helping students learn in a learner-centered environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Sterling: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). The pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatongi, F. (2007). Person-centred approach in schools: Is it the answer to disruptive behaviour in our classrooms? Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 20(2), 205–211. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. (2001). A new way of learning and being together. Windsor: Centresource Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1999, August 2). Influences on student learning. Inaugural Lecture: Professor of Education, University of Aukland. Available from http://library.hud.ac.uk/summon

  • Hobson, A. J., Malderez, A., Tracey, L., Ashby, P., Mitchell, N., McIntyre, J., et al. (2009). Becoming a teacher: Teachersexperiences of initial teacher training, induction and early professional development. Final Report DCSF Research Report DCSF- RR115. https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DCSF

  • Jones, F., Jones, P., & Jones, J. (2007). Tools for teaching; discipline, instruction, motivation. Santa Cruz: F.H. Jones & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knippen, J. T., & Green, T. B. (1997). Asking for positive reinforcement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 9(5), 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning. A guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge/Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Marzano, S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that work: Research-based strategy for every teacher. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Leary, M. (2006). Can inspectors really improve the quality of teaching in the PCE sector? Classroom observations under the microscope. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11(2), 191–198. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted. (2012). The framework for school inspection from September 2012.Doc. http://www.ofsted.gov.uk

  • Patterson, C. H. (1980). Theories of counselling and psychotherapy cited in P. T. Clarke (1994) A person-centred approach to stress-management. British Journal of guidance and Counselling, 22, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, G. (2014). Teaching today: A practical guide (5th ed.). London: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. (2012). Teacher educators from the lifelong learning sector working together to develop the use of modelling in their practice: An action research project. Consortium for PCET annual conference 2012 in association with Higher Education Academy Seminar Series 2011–12, Friday, 29th June 2012, University of Huddersfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, P., & Caproni, P. (1997). Critical theory in the management classroom: Engaging power, ideology and praxis. Journal of Management Education, 21(5), 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, M., & Thornton, B. (2001). Supervision and the three-stage model of helping. In Advising and supporting teachers (pp. 61–76). Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinis, N. (2013). FE sector fights back over Ofsted. InTuition, 2(Spring), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R., & Thompson, R. (2011). Education and training for young people at risk of becoming NEET: Findings from an ethnographic study of work-based learning programmes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townend, M. (2013). Massive rise in disruptive behaviour, warn teachers. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/mar/24/schools-disruptive-behaviour

  • Vizard, D. (2012). How to manage behaviour in further education. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachob, P. (2011). Critical friendship circles: The cultural challenge of cool feedback. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J., & Cole, P. (2004). Conducting evaluation and research with and for ‘disaffected’ students: Practical and methodological issues. British Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lebor, M. (2017). A Methodology for Supporting Tutors Who Face Challenging Classes. In: Classroom Behaviour Management in the Post-School Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57051-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57051-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57050-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57051-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics