So Why Do Disruptive Students Say They Disrupt Classes?

  • Mervyn Lebor


This chapter investigates data from over 100 students, exploring how ‘disruptive students’ themselves view challenging or difficult classes. Classes were identified as ‘disruptive’ by their institution, department or teacher and then I questioned these students as to why they behaved in a disruptive way in sessions.


  1. Atkins, L. (2013). Researching ‘with’, not ‘on’: Engaging marginalised learners in the research process. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(1–2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avis, J., Fisher, R., & Thompson, R. (2015). Teaching in lifelong learning: A guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, I., & Riseborough, G. (1993). Youth and inequality. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bathmaker, A. (1999). Managing messes and coping with uncertainty: Reviewing training for teachers in post-compulsory education and training. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(2), 185–195. doi: 10.1080/0309877990230203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bathmaker, A. (2013). Defining ‘knowledge’ in vocational education qualifications in England: An analysis of key stakeholders and their constructions of knowledge, purposes and content. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(1), 87–107. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2012.755210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London/New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small social research projects. Maidenhead: OUP, McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  10. DFE. (2012). Pupil behaviour in schools in England. DFE-RR218.
  11. Ecclestone, K. (2012). From emotional and psychological well-being to character education: Challenging policy discourses of behavioural science and ‘vulnerability’. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gunaratnam, Y. (2003). Researching ‘race’ and ethnicity: Methods, knowledge and power. London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Petty, G. (2014). Teaching today: A practical guide (5th ed.). London: Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Shacklock, G., & Thorp, L. (2005). Life history and narrative approaches. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 156–163). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Wallace, S. (2003). Managing behaviour and motivating students in further education. Exeter: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
  16. Wallace, S. (2007). Managing behaviour in the lifelong learning sector. Exeter: Learning Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mervyn Lebor
    • 1
  1. 1.Leeds City CollegeLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations