Skip to main content

Applying the Idea of Solidarity to Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solidarity in the European Union

Abstract

The chapter by Ulrich Steinvorth deals with the application of the concept of solidarity to Europe. He starts by analysing solidarity as a virtue, considering individuals who have similar goals, are on the same legal level, reject unnecessary domination and authoritarianism, demand equality, presume fraternity and help each other when one of them is in a plight that none of them is responsible for. Steinvorth argues that this implies that while justice requires me to compensate for a damage D suffered by B only if I am responsible for D, solidarity requires me to help B—as long as I have the resources to help—even if neither B nor I are responsible for D. However, Durkheim showed that, nonetheless, solidarity and justice are compatible, because without solidarity individual liberty will be defeated by authoritarianism, which will always prove stronger than any single individual fighting alone for their liberty. Yet without individual liberty and responsibility, solidarity will degenerate into parasitism. With regard to the contemporary problems in the field, Steinvorth points out that solidarity has been appealed to from the outset of the European unification, but the concept was obscured by (a) the idea that the subjects of solidarity can be nations rather than individuals and (b) the failure to call upon solidarity in a crisis that no member is responsible for. The latter scenario meant that there was insufficient help for the Mediterranean states that were the place of first arrival for most refugees, whereas the former has meant that European unification is most often measured according to whether it helps nations rather than individuals, thus neglecting the interests of individuals and the unemployment that economic unification causes. To prevent this, Steinvorth argues not only for measures to recognize rising unemployment as something that can be good rather than evil (e.g. by introducing a basic income) but also for taking subsidiarity seriously by promoting regionalization and secessionism and decentralizing European administrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Agence France Presse-Informations et Documentations, Nr. 291, 13 May 1950. German tr. in Europa-Archiv (Folge 11/1950, S. 3091 f.), in: Forschungsinstitut der deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e. V., Dokumente und Berichte, Bd. 17, Teilband II. Europa-Dokumente zur Frage der europäischen Einigung, ed., on behalf of the Auswärtiges Amt, Bonn 1962, S. 680 ff. My translation from the German translation.

References

  • Archibugi, D. (2008). The global commonwealth of citizens. Toward a cosmopolitan democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. (2013). If Mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz, K. (Hg.). (1998). Solidarität. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2005). Justice beyond borders: A global political theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (1998). Solidarität: Postmoderne Perspektiven. In K. Bayertz (Hg.), Solidarität (pp. 430–452). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (2003). Flexible citizenship for a global society. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 2, 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (2012). Flexible government for a globalized world. In D. Archibugi, M. Koenig-Archibugi, & R. Marchetti (Eds.), Global democracy (pp. 150–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazony, Y. (2016, September 6). Nationalism and the future of western freedom. Mosaic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, K. H. (1998). Solidarität und Geschichte. Institutionen und sozialer Begriff der Solidarität in Westeuropa im 19. Jahrhundert. In K. Bayertz (Hg.), Solidarität (pp. 172–194). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2000). Global governance and cosmopolitan citizens. In J. S. Nye Jr. & J. D. Donahue (Eds.), Governance in a globalizing world (pp. 155–177). Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A. M. (2005). A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinvorth, U. (2014). Capitalism, unemployment, and basic income. Homo Oeconomicus, 31(1–2), 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Steinvorth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinvorth, U. (2017). Applying the Idea of Solidarity to Europe. In: Grimmel, A., Giang, S. (eds) Solidarity in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics