Advertisement

Cantilever Beam Natural Frequency Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks

  • Sallehuddin Mohamed HarisEmail author
  • Hamed Mohammadi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 16)

Abstract

Available methods for calculating frequency in cantilever beams have much complexity. In this study we present a new method for calculating natural frequencies in cantilever beams. For this purpose, we use the finite element method (FEM), dynamic analysis and artificial neural network (ANN) techniques to calculate the natural frequency. Finite element software was used to analyze 100 samples of cantilever beams, and the results were used as training and testing data sets in artificial neural networks. For the ANN. the multilayer feed-forward network and back-propagation algorithms were used. We made use of different transfer functions and built 45 different networks in order to find the best network performance. Mean squared error (MSE) was used to evaluate the network performance. Finally, the natural frequencies which were predicted by the ANN techniques were compared to the natural frequencies calculated from theoretical formulation, as well as to those obtained from FEM methods. The results obtained show that the error was quite small.

Keywords

Natural frequency Artificial neural networks Mean squared error Cantilever beams Finite elements 

References

  1. 1.
    Hamdan, M.N., Jubran, B.A.: Free and force vibrations of a restrained cantilever beam carrying a concentrated mass. J. King Abdulaziz Univ. 3, 71–83 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bokaian, A.: Natural frequencies of beams under tensile axial loads. Sound Vib. 142, 481–498 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, W.H., Haung, C.C.: Free vibration of beams with elastically restrained edges and intermediate concentrated masses. Sound Vib. 122, 193–207 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, W.H., Yeh, F.H.: Free vibration of restrained non uniform beam with intermediate masses. Sound Vib. 117, 555–570 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    GoeI, R.P.: Vibration of a beam carrying concentrated mass. J. Appl. Mech. 40, 821–822 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kounadis, A.N.: Dynamic response of cantilevers with attached masses. Eng. Mech. Div. 101, 695–706 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kojima, H., Nagaya, K., Niiyama, N., Nakai, K.: Vibration control of a beam structure using an electromagnetic damper with velocity feedback. Bull. JSME 29, 2653–2659 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Ansari, L.S.: Calculating static deflection and natural frequency of stepped cantilever beam using modified rayleigh method. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 3, 113–124 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reddy, M.R.S., Reddy, B.S., Reddy, V.N., Sreenivasulu, S.: Prediction of natural frequency of laminated composite plates using artificial neural networks. Sci. Res. Eng. 4, 329–337 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H.: Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivative using multilayer feed forward networks. Neural Netw. 3, 551–560 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carpenter, W.C., Barthelemy, J.F.: Common misconceptions about neural networks as approximates. Comput. Civ. Eng. 8, 345–358 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)BangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations