Advertisement

Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder

  • Turker Tekin ErguzelEmail author
  • Nevzat Tarhan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 16)

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-pharmacological treatment that is associated with significant improvements in clinical symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD). The efficacy of rTMS treatment can be predicted using pre-treatment cordance, a quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) method extracting information from absolute and relative power of EEG spectra, that will prevent trial-and error treatment sequences, subject suffering and increase in health-care costs. In this study, pre-treatment QEEG data were collected from 6 frontal electrodes (Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, F7 and F8) in slow bands (delta and theta) for 147 MDD subjects. In order to classify MDD subjects as responder or non-responder, four different machine learning techniques, which are Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT), were used and their performances were evaluated. The results show that it is possible to predict rTMS treatment responders with a sensitivity of 95.6%, accuracy of 86.4% and area under Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) value of 0.92 using SVM.

Keywords

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation QEEG cordance Neural networks Support vector machines Decision tree 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to express their thanks to NPIstanbul Hospital for providing the required EEG data.

References

  1. 1.
    Trivedi, M., Morris, D., Grannemann, B., et al.: Symptom clusters as predictors of late response to antidepressant treatment. J. Clin. Psychiatry 66, 1064–1070 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bares, M., Brunovsky, M., Novak, T., et al.: The change of prefrontal QEEG theta cordance as a predictor of response to bupropion treatment in patients who had failed to respond to previous antidepressant treatments. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 20, 459–466 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Reardon, J., Solvason, H., et al.: Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 1208–1216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Im, C., Lee, C.: computer-aided performance evaluation of a multichannel transcranial magnetic stimulation system. IEEE Trans. Mag. 42, 3803–3808 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Price, G., Lee, J., Garvey, C.: Appraisal of sessional EEG features as a correlate of clinical changes in an rTMS treatment of depression. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 39, 131–138 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Micoulaud, J., Micoulaud-Franchi, J., Richieri, R.: Parieto-temporal alpha EEG band power at baseline as a predictor of antidepressant treatment response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a preliminary study. J. Affect Disorders 137, 156–160 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kito, S., Hasegawa, T., Koga, Y.: Cerebral blood flow ratio of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex as a potential predictor of treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 5, 547–553 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richieri, R., Boyer, L., Farisse, J., et al.: Predictive value of brain perfusion SPECT for rTMS response in pharmacoresistant depression. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 38, 1715–1722 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schachter, S., Holmes, G., Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite, D.: Behavioral aspects of epilepsy: principles and practice demos, pp. 268–269. Medical Publishing (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khodayari, A., Reilly, J., Hasey, G.: Using pre-treatment electroencephalography data to predict response to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depression. In: 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August, 2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khodayari, A., Hasey, G., Maccrimmon, D.: A pilot study to determine whether machine learning methodologies using pre-treatment electroencephalography can predict the symptomatic response to clozapine therapy. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 1998–2006 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bares, M., Brunovsky, M., Kopecek, M., et al.: Changes in QEEG prefrontal cordance as a predictor of response to antidepressants in patients with treatment resistant depressive disorder: a pilot study. J. Psychiatr. Res. 41, 319–325 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang, J., Singh, H., Hines, E., et al.: Channel selection and classification of electroencephalogram signals: an artificial neural network and genetic algorithm-based approach. Artif. Intell. Med. 55, 117–126 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sriraam, N., Eswaran, C.: Performance evaluation of neural network and linear predictors for near-lossless compression of EEG signals. IEEE Trans. Inf Technol. Biomed. 12, 87–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lima, C., Coelho, A.: Kernel machines for epilepsy diagnosis via EEG signal classification: A comparative study. Artif. Intell. Med. 53, 83–95 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siuly, S., Li, Y.: Improving the separability of motor imagery EEG signals using a cross correlation-based least square support vector machine for brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20, 526–538 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rivero, D., Guo, L., Seoane, J., et al.: Using genetic algorithms and k-nearest neighbour for automatic frequency band selection for signal classification. IET Sig. Process. 20, 186–194 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trujillo-Barreto, N., Aubert-Vázquez, E., Penny, W.: Bayesian M/EEG source reconstruction with spatio-temporal priors. Neuroimage 39, 318–335 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leuchter, A., Cook, I., Lufkin, R., et al.: Cordance: a new method for assessment of cerebral perfusion and metabolism using quantitative electroencephalography. Neuroimage 3, 208–219 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leuchter, A., Uijtdehaage, S., Cook, I., et al.: Relationship between brain electrical activity and cortical perfusion in normal subjects. Psychiatry Res. 90, 125–140 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tarhan, N., HizliSayar, G., Tan, O., et al.: Efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 43(4), 279–284 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamilton, M.: A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56–62 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sivanandam, N., Sumathi, S., Deepa, S.: Introduction to Neural Networks using MATLAB 6.0, pp. 21–223. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing company Limited, New Delhi (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lek, S., Guegan, J.: Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction. Ecol. Model. 120, 65–73 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boser, B., Guyon, I., Vapnik, V.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 144–152 (1992)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector network. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chang, C., Lin, C.: LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 1–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goker, I., Osman, O., Ozekes, S., et al.: Classification of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy data acquired through scanning electromyography with machine learning algorithms. J. Med. Syst. 36, 2705–2711 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cervantes, J., Lamont, F.G.: Data selection based on decision tree for SVM classification on large data sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 37, 787–798 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hernanadez, J.: ROC curves for regression. Pattern Recogn. 46, 3395–3411 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ling, C., Huang, J., Zhang, H.: AUC: a statistically consistent and more discriminating measure than accuracy. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2003, pp. 519–524 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arns, M., Drinkenburg, W., Fitzgerald, G., et al.: Neurophysiological predictors of non-response to rTMS in depression. Brain Stimul. 5, 569–576 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kito, S., Hasegawa, T., Koga, Y.: Cerebral blood flow ratio of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex as a potential predictor of treatment response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 5, 547–553 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Richieri, R., Boyer, L., Farisse, J., et al.: Predictive value of brain perfusion SPECT for rTMS response in pharmacoresistant depression. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 38, 1715–1722 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khodayari, A., Reilly, J., Hasey, G., et al.: Using pre-treatment electroencephalography data to predict response to transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depression. In: 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Boston, Massachusetts (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khodayari, A., Hasey, G., Maccrimmon, D., et al.: A pilot study to determine whether machine learning methodologies using pre-treatment electroencephalography can predict the symptomatic response to clozapine therapy. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 1998–2006 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    O’Reardon, J., Solvason, H., Janicak, P., et al.: Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol. Psychiatr. 62, 1208–1216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brakemeier, E., Wilbertz, G., Rodax, S.: Patterns of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depression: replication study in drug-free patients. J. Affect Disorders 108, 59–70 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grazilla, O., William, P., Andre, M., et al.: Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. R. 36, 1140–1152 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringUskudar UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry, NPIstanbul HospitalUskudar UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations