Skip to main content

Workflow Predictions Through Operational Analytics and Machine Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automated Workflow Scheduling in Self-Adaptive Clouds

Part of the book series: Computer Communications and Networks ((CCN))

Abstract

Workflow execution employs predictive analytics to extract significant, unidentified as well as precious insights from several stages of execution. Further, the operational analytics integrates these valuable insights directly into decision engine which enables analytical as well as machine learning-driven decision-making for an efficient workflow execution. This chapter highlights several analytical and machine learning approaches that are practiced in workflow predictions. Additionally, it explains the significance of hybrid approach which includes both analytical and machine learning models for workflow prediction. Finally, it describes the hybrid approach employed in PANORAMA architecture using two workflow applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kurowski K, Oleksiak A, Nabrzyski J, Kwiecien A, Wojtkiewicz M, Dyczkowski M, Guim F, Corbalan J, Labarta J (2005) Multi-criteria grid resource management using performance prediction techniques. In: CoreGrid integration workshop, Pisa, Itally

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nudd GR, Kerbyson DJ, Panaefstathiou E, Perry SC, Harper JS, Wilcox DV (2000) Pace-A toolset for the performance prediction of parallel and distributed systems. High Perform Comput Appl 14:228–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seneviratne S, Levy D (2011) Task profiling model for load profile prediction. Futur Gener Comput Syst 27:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Badia RM, Escale F, Gabriel E, Gimenez J, Keller R, Labarta J, Muller MS (2003) Performance prediction in a grid environment. In: Presented at the international conference on grid computing, first European across grids conference, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steffenel LA (2005) LaPIe: communications collectives Adaptées aux Grilles de Calcul. PhD, INPG, Grenoble, France

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fahringer T, Jugravu A, Pllana S, Prodan R, Seragiotto C Jr, Truong HL (2005) ASKALON: a tool set for cluster and grid computing. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 17:143–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber R, Volgers P, Vita AD, Stengel M, Tran TM (2003) Parameterisation to tailor commodity clusters to applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 19:111–120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Glimcher L, Agrawal G (2007) A performance prediction framework for grid-based data mining application. In: Presented at the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Desprez F, Quinson M, Suter F (2002) Dynamic performance forecasting for network-enabled servers in a heterogeneous environment. In: Presented at the international conference on Parallel & Distributed Processing Techniques & Applications (PDPTA), Las Vegas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalho M, Miceli R, Maciel Jr. PD, Brasileiro F, Lopes R (2010) Predicting the quality of service of a peer-to-peer desktop grid. In: 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), Melbourne, Australia, pp 649–654

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolski R, Spring N, Hayes J (1999) The Network weather service: a distributed resource performance forecasting service for metacomputing. Futur Gener Comput Syst 15:757–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinda PA (2000) Resource signal prediction and its application to real time scheduling advisors. PhD, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Song B, Ernemann C, Yahyapour R (2004) Parallel computer workload modelling with Markov Chains. In: Presented at the international conference on job scheduling strategies for parallel processing, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang L, Schopf J M, Foster I (2003) Homeostatic and tendency-based CPU load predictions. In: 17th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2003), Los Alamitos, California, USA, IEEE CD-ROM, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang L, Schopf J M, Foster I (2003) Conservative scheduling: using predicted variance to improve scheduling decisions in dynamic environments. In ACM/IEEE international conference on Supercomputing (SC2003), Phoenix, Arizona, USA, pp 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang L, Schopf JM, Foster I (2005) Improving parallel data transfer times using predicted variances in shared networks. In: Presented at the fifth IEEE international symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID05), Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Y, Hwang K, Yuan Y, Zheng W (2010) Adaptive workload prediction of grid performance in confidence windows. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 21:925–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith W, Taylor V, Foster I (1999) Using runtime predictions to estimate Queue wait times and improve Scheduler performance. In: International workshop on job scheduling strategies for parallel processing, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp 202–219

    Google Scholar 

  19. Atkeson CG, Moore AW, Schaal SA (1997) Locally weighted learning. Artif Intell Rev 11:11–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson DR, Martinez TR (1997) Improved heterogeneous distance function. Artif Intell Res 6:1–34

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodero I, Guim F, Corbalán J, Labarta J (2005) eNANOS: coordinated scheduling in grid environments. In: Presented at the parallel computing: current & future issues of high-end computing, Parco 2005

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrzejak A, Domingues P, Silva L (2006) Predicting machine availabilities in desktop pools. In: IEEE/IFIP Network Operations & Management Symposium (NOMS 2006), Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matsunaga A, Fortes JAB (2010) On the use of machine learning to predict the time and resources consumed by applications. In: Presented at the 10th IEEE/ACM international conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  24. Minh TN, Wolters L (2010) Using historical data to predict application runtimes on backfilling parallel systems. In: Presented at the 18th Euromicro conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing (PDP ’10), Pisa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  25. Duan R, Nadeem F, Wang J, Zhang Y, Prodan R, Fahringer T (2009) A hybrid intelligent method for performance modeling and prediction of workflow activities in grids. In: Presented at the 9th IEEE/ACM international symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID ’09), Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  26. PANORAMA (2015) An approach to performance modeling and diagnosis of extreme scale workflows. Ewa Deelman, Christopher Carothers, Anirban Mandal, Brian Tierney, Jeffrey S. Vetter, Ilya Baldin, Claris Castillo, Gideon Juve, Dariusz Król, Vickie Lynch, Ben Mayer, Jeremy Meredith, Thomas Proffen, Paul Ruth, Rafael Ferreira da Silva. Int J High Perform Comput Appl (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kousalya, G., Balakrishnan, P., Pethuru Raj, C. (2017). Workflow Predictions Through Operational Analytics and Machine Learning. In: Automated Workflow Scheduling in Self-Adaptive Clouds. Computer Communications and Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56982-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56982-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56981-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56982-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics