Abstract
This chapter uses what we have learned about technology and inequality to find new opportunities for reducing inequality in a more digital world. Our key strategy is to focus on the ways financial value is created by the digital technology sector, and the specific ways that value is captured. Digitally mediated markets are a new and growing phenomenon, and new digital business models have created valuable products and services through their unprecedented abilities to experiment, amass unique data, and deploy to huge populations, offering new ways to capture and concentrate that value on a seemingly unprecedented scale. Inequality can be addressed through the remedies proposed by the technological and institutional context schools , but we think these will be incomplete without paying attention to the business models being used to deploy these technologies. Specific technological mediation choices, or the mobilization of stakeholders that technologies depend on, may be part of the strategy, but these issues in the end always return to the question of how to invent alternative business models that will share the value captured more evenly. Whatever path we choose, the wealth shifts associated with digital technology are too large to ignore if we want to seriously reverse increasing inequality and create more widespread opportunity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1994). Human development index: Methodology and measurement. Retrieved February 21, 2017, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-methodology-and-measurement.
Breen, R. (Ed.). (2004). Social mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56–62.
Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 51–82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosoff, M. (2017). How the #deleteUber campaign revealed Uber’s fatal flaw. http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/02/how-the-deleteuber-campaign-revealed-ubers-fatal-flaw.
Mason, P. (2016). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Preston, C. (2016). The 20 most generous companies of the fortune 500. Retrieved February 22, 2017, from http://fortune.com/2016/06/22/fortune-500-most-charitable-companies/.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, J.P. (2017). Restoring Technology as an Engine of Opportunity. In: Technology and Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56958-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56958-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56957-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56958-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)