Abstract
The relationship between technology companies and aspects of their institutional context, such as regulation and taxation, is a less explored area in discussions of technology and inequality. This chapter discusses the role of intellectual property in wealth concentration , and technology companies’ use of it for tax avoidance purposes. Specific forms of political lobbying , within states and in global trade regimes, are also used to help explain the wealth effects of digital technology in an era of globalization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beerepoot, N., & Lambregts, B. (2015). Competition in online job marketplaces: Towards a global labour market for outsourcing services? Global Networks, 15(2), 236–255.
Benkler, Y. (2001). The battle over the institutional ecosystem in the digital environment. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 84–84.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Chenoweth, N. (2014). How Ireland got Apple’s $9bn profit. Retrieved January 29, 2017, from http://www.afr.com/news/politics/national/how-ireland-got-apples-9bn-profit-20140305-j7cxm.
Cohen, J. E., & Lemley, M. A. (2001). Patent scope and innovation in the software industry. California Law Review, 89(1), 1–57.
Corrado, C. A., & Hulten, C. R. (2010). How do you measure a “technological revolution”? The American Economic Review, 100(2), 99–104.
Decker, S. (2016). Apple wins appeal reinstating $119.6 million Samsung verdict. Retrieved January 27, 2017, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-07/apple-wins-appeal-reinstating-119-6-million-samsung-verdict.
Dreyfuss, R. C. (2000). Are business method patents bad for business. Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, 16, 263.
Drutman, L. (2015). The business of America is lobbying: How corporations became politicized and politics became more corporate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Genschel, P., & Schwarz, P. (2011). Tax competition: A literature review. Socio-Economic Review, 9(2), 339–370.
Germonprez, M., Allen, J., Warner, B., Hill, J., & McClements, G. (2013). Open source communities of competitors. Interactions, 20(6), 54–59.
Geron, T. (2013). California becomes first state to regulate ridesharing services Lyft, Sidecar, UberX. Retrieved January 30, 2017, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2013/09/19/california-becomes-first-state-to-regulate-ridesharing-services-lyft-sidecar-uberx/ - 61d6dbd767fe.
Goldsmith, J., & Wu, T. (2006). Who controls the Internet?: Illusions of a borderless world. New York: Oxford University Press.
González, A. G. (2006). The software patent debate. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1(3), 196–206.
Hagiu, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2013). The new patent intermediaries: Platforms, defensive aggregators, and super-aggregators. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 45–65.
Heitman, W. (2016). Intangible assets: They’re not what you think they are. http://ww2.cfo.com/accounting/2016/07/intangible-assets-theyre-not-think/.
Hungerford, T. L. (2011). An analysis of the “Buffett Rule”. Retrieved January 28, 2017, from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/865/?utm_source=digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu%2Fkey_workplace%2F865&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
Hwang, C. (2014). The new corporate migration: Tax diversion through inversion. Brooklyn Law Review, 80, 807.
Joffe-Walt, C. (2013). Most people are supposed to pay this tax. Almost nobody actually pays it. Retrieved January 29, 2017, from http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/04/16/177384487/most-people-are-supposed-to-pay-this-tax.
Kahn, J., & Drucker, J. (2016). Google lowered taxes by $2.4 billion using European subsidiaries. Retrieved January 29, 2017, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-19/google-lowered-taxes-by-2-4-billion-using-european-subsidiaries.
Lee, E. (2009). Decoding the DMCA safe harbors. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 32, 233–276.
Lowery, D. (2007). Why do organized interests lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying. Polity, 39(1), 29–54.
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.
Menn, J. (2016). Exclusive: Yahoo secretly scanned customer emails for U.S. intelligence—sources. Retrieved January 30, 2017, from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yahoo-nsa-exclusive-idUSKCN1241YT.
Merges, R. P. (1999). As many as six impossible patents before breakfast: Property rights for business concepts and patent system reform. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 577–615.
Ocean Tomo. (2015). Annual study of intangible asset market value from Ocean Tomo, LLC. Retrieved January 27, 2017, from http://www.oceantomo.com/2015/03/04/2015-intangible-asset-market-value-study/.
Orcutt, M. (2016). Tech giants go to Washington. Retrieved January 30, 2017, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602172/tech-giants-go-to-washington/.
Parchomovsky, G., & Wagner, R. P. (2005). Patent portfolios. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(1), 1–77.
Powers, S. M., & Jablonski, M. (2015). The real cyber war: The political economy of internet freedom. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Ramiller, N. C., & Pentland, B. T. (2009). Management implications in information systems research: The untold story. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(6), 474.
Richards, G. (2015). The new global nomads: Youth travel in a globalizing world. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(3), 340–352.
Riles, A. (2014). Managing regulatory arbitrage: A conflict of laws approach. Cornell International Law Journal, 47, 63.
Rivard, S., & Aubert, B. A. (Eds.). (2015). Information technology outsourcing. London: Routledge.
Schlackman, S. (2014). How Mickey Mouse keeps changing copyright law. Retrieved January 27, 2017, from http://artlawjournal.com/mickey-mouse-keeps-changing-copyright-law/.
Segan, S. (2012). Infographic: Smartphone patent wars explained. Retrieved January 27, 2017, from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2399098,00.asp.
Sikka, P., & Willmott, H. (2013). The tax avoidance industry: Accountancy firms on the make. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 9(4), 415–443.
Tax Justice Network. (2015). The scale of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Retrieved January 29, 2017, from http://www.taxjustice.net/scaleBEPS/.
Tax Justice Network. (2016). More than $12 trillion stuffed offshore, from developing countries alone. Retrieved January 29, 2017, from http://www.taxjustice.net/2016/05/09/17103/.
Weise, K. (2015). This is how Uber takes over a city. Retrieved January 30, 2017, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2015-06-23/this-is-how-uber-takes-over-a-city.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, J.P. (2017). Regulation and Taxation: The New Digital Advantage. In: Technology and Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56958-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56958-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56957-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56958-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)