Skip to main content

Modelling Potential Biophysical Impacts of Climate Change in the Atlantic Forest: Closing the Gap to Identify Vulnerabilities in Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Climate Change Adaptation in Latin America

Abstract

The lack of information on the climate-related vulnerability of territories, populations, and productive sectors in Brazil—and the ecosystems that they are dependent upon—is a serious constraint to identifying possible strategies for local and regional adaptation to climate change. In order to mainstream adaptation efforts in sectors’ planning and budget demands, the existing knowledge gap between what climate models project and what impacts this might have at the local level must be filled. This is particularly significant in the Atlantic Forest region, where over 70% of Brazil’s population currently resides. In the context of the Biodiversity and Climate Change project in the Atlantic Rainforest, this article focusses on the main results of a spatially explicit climate-impact model, which forecasts trends in soil humidity, natural vegetation, agro-climatic zoning, erosion, flooding, landslides, and animal disease vectors, according to optimistic and pessimistic climate change scenarios until 2100. This study is intended as an advisory tool to support the definition of robust and proactive adaptation actions for several sectors in Brazil, framed into the new National Adaptation Plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further information please refer to: www.moveonadaptation.com.

  2. 2.

    SISMOI is a project under responsibility of the Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.

References

  • Alfieri L, Feyen L, Dottori F, Bianchi A (2015) Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios. Glob Environ Change 35:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, vol 300(9). FAO, Rome, p D05109

    Google Scholar 

  • Althoff TD, Menezes RSC, de Carvalho AL, de Siqueira Pinto A, Santiago GACF, Ometto JPHB et al (2016) Climate change impacts on the sustainability of the firewood harvest and vegetation and soil carbon stocks in a tropical dry forest in Santa Teresinha Municipality, Northeast Brazil. For Ecol Manag 360:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar MR, Li Liu D, Macadam I, Kelly G (2013) Adapting agriculture to climate change: a review. Theor Appl Climatol 113(1–2):225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apurv T, Mehrotra R, Sharma A, Goyal MK, Dutta S (2015) Impact of climate change on floods in the Brahmaputra basin using CMIP5 decadal predictions. J Hydrol 527:281–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assad E, Pinto HS, Nassar A, Harfuch L, Freitas S, Farinelli B et al (2013) Impacts of climate change on Brazilian agriculture (no. 18740). The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe NW, Cooper RD, Mottram P, Sweeney AW (2009) Australia’s dengue risk driven by human adaptation to climate change. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3(5):e429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil (2005) Análise da população brasileira aos impactos sanitários das mudanças climáticas. Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia. Fiocruz. Brasília, p 201

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney J, Cesano D, Russell J, La Rovere EL, Corral T, Coelho NS, Santos L (2014) Climate change adaptation strategies for smallholder farmers in the Brazilian Sertão. Clim Change 126(1–2):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzadilla A, Rehdanz K, Betts R, Falloon P, Wiltshire A, Tol RS (2013) Climate change impacts on global agriculture. Clim Change 120(1–2):357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LP, Luther C, Moo-Llanes D, Ramsey JM, Danis-Lozano R, Peterson AT (2015) Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors. Philos Trans R Soc B 370(1665):20140135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Lendrum D, Reithinger R (2002) Dengue and climate change. Trends Parasitol 18(12):524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centro Universitário de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Desastres (CEPED) (2012) Atlas brasileiro de desastres naturais 1991 a 2010: volume Brasil. Florianópolis, CEPED, UFSC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou SC, Lyra A, Mourão C, Dereczynski C, Pilotto I, Gomes J, Campos D (2014) Assessment of climate change over South America under RCP 4.5 and 8.5 downscaling scenarios. Am J Clim Change 3(05):512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo AF (2007) Conseqüências das mudanças climáticas globais para as espécies arbóreas da Mata Atlântica. Doctoral dissertation, Dissertação de Mestrado), Instituto de Biologia/UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Colón-González FJ, Fezzi C, Lake IR, Hunter PR (2013) The effects of weather and climate change on dengue. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7(11):e2503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor JD, Schwabe K, King D, Knapp K (2012) Irrigated agriculture and climate change: the influence of water supply variability and salinity on adaptation. Ecol Econ 77:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crepani E, Medeiros JD, Hernandez Filho P, Florenzano TG, Duarte V, Barbosa CCF (2001) Sensoriamento remoto e geoprocessamento aplicados ao zoneamento ecológico-econômico e ao ordenamento territorial. INPE, São José dos Campos, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva AM (2004) Rainfall erosivity map for Brazil. Catena 57(3):251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destouni G, Verrot L (2014) Screening long-term variability and change of soil moisture in a changing climate. J Hydrol 516:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douville H, Colin J, Krug E, Cattiaux J, Thao S (2016) Midlatitude daily summer temperatures reshaped by soil moisture under climate change. Geophys Res Lett 43(2):812–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman JR (1971) An experimentally derived model for actual evapotranspiration. Agric Meteorol 8:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes C, Beserra EB, Castro FP Jr, Santos JW, Santos TS (2006) Biologia e exigências térmicas de aedes aegypti (l.)(diptera: Culicidae) provenientes de quatro regioes bioclimáticas da paraıba. Neotrop Entomol 35:853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follador M (2015) Sistematização de informações e critérios para definição do Sistema de Monitoramento e Observação dos impactos das mudanças climáticas (SISMOI) – Proposta Final. UNESCO e Ministério de Ciência, tecnologia e informação, Brasília, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Follador M et al (2015) Avaliação de impactos econômicos de riscos climáticos e proposta preliminar de medidas de adaptação a nível nacional – setor Segurança Alimentar. Produto 2: Impactos Macroeconômicos. CEPAL e Ministério de Meio Ambiente, Brasília, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton LM, Dickin SK, Schuster-Wallace CJ (2014) Mapping global vulnerability to dengue using the water associated disease index. United Nations University, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Füssel HM (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2(2):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Romero A, Muñoz J, Andrés N, Palacios D (2010) Relationship between climate change and vegetation distribution in the Mediterranean mountains: Manzanares Head valley, Sierra De Guadarrama (Central Spain). Clim Change 100(3–4):645–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gevaerd R, Freitas S (2006) Estimativa operacional da umidade do solo para iniciação de modelos de previsão numérica da atmosfera parte I: descrição da metodologia e validação. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia 21(3):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto K et al (2013) Analysis of effects of meteorological factors on dengue incidence in Sri Lanka using time series data. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. In: Contribution of working group ii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Fay PA, Blair JM, Collins SL, Smith MD, Carlisle JD et al (2002) Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science 298(5601):2202–2205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer MU, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne A, Shearer FM, Barker CM, Moore CG, Carvalho RG, Coelho GE, Van Bortel W, Hendrickx G, Schaffner F, Elyazar IR, Teng H-J, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Pigott DM, Scott TW, Smith DL, Wint GW, Golding N, Hay SI (2015) The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus. Elife 4:e08347. doi:10.7554/eLife.08347

  • Lambrechts L, Paaijmans KP, Fansiri T, Carrington LB, Kramer LD, Thomas MB, Scott TW (2011) Impact of daily temperature fluctuations on dengue virus transmission by Aedes aegypti. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(18):7460–7465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lézine AM, Assi-Kaudjhis C, Roche E, Vincens A, Achoundong G (2013) Towards an understanding of West African montane forest response to climate change. J Biogeogr 40(1):183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lino JS (2010) Evolução do sistema plantio direto e produção de sedimentos no Rio Grande do Sul. Doctoral dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz) Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe R, Bailey TC, Stephenson DB, Jupp TE, Graham RJ, Barcellos C, Carvalho MS (2013) The development of an early warning system for climate-sensitive disease risk with a focus on dengue epidemics in Southeast Brazil. Stat Med 32(5):864–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marengo JA (2007) Mudanças climáticas globais e seus efeitos sobre a biodiversidade: caracterização do clima atual e definição das alterações climáticas para o território brasileiro ao longo do século XXI. Brasília: MMA nº26, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363(6426):234–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moro GT, de Souza LVMP, Almeida ES (2011) Levantamento de susceptibilidade a deslizamento e erosão em encostas–estudo de caso: Morro da Cruz–Itajaí–SC. XV SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO (SBSR). Anais… Editor INPE, Curitiba, pp 4162–4169

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R, Babiker M, Brinkman S, Calvo E, Carter T, Edmonds J, Elgizouli I, Emori S, Erda L, Hibbard KA et al (2008) Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. IPCC expert meeting report on new scenarios. intergovernmental panel on climate change, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller C, Cramer W, Hare WL, Lotze-Campen H (2011) Climate change risks for African agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(11):4313–4315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naish S, Dale P, Mackenzie JS, McBride J, Mengersen K, Tong S (2014) Climate change and dengue: a critical and systematic review of quantitative modelling approaches. BMC Infect Dis 14(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehren UDO, Kirchner A, Sattler D, Turetta AP, Heinrich J (2013) Impact of natural climate change and historical land use on landscape development in the Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 85(2):497–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neto FL, Moldenhauer WC (1992) Erosividade da chuva: sua distribuição e relação com perdas de solo em Campinas, SP. Bragantia 51(2):189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD and JRC (2008) Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide (no. 2005/3). OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira AS (1986) Interações entre sistemas frontais na América do Sul e convecção na Amazônia. São José dos Campos. INPE-4008-TDL/239). Dissertation. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer M, Campos M, Warren R, Birkmann J, Luber G, O’Neill B, Takahashi K (2014) Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. contribution of working group ii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1039–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr D, Wang G, Ahmed KF (2015) Hydrological changes in the U.S. Northeast using the Connecticut River Basin as a case study: Part 2. Projections of the future. Glob Planet Change 133:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PBMC—Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas (2014) Base científica das mudanças climáticas. Contribuição do Grupo de Trabalho 1 do Painel Brasileiro de Mudanças Climáticas ao Primeiro Relatório da Avaliação Nacional sobre Mudanças Climáticas. In: Ambrizzi T, Araujo M (eds) COPPE. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2004) A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on machine learning (ICML-04). ACM, Princeton, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Piao S, Ciais P, Huang Y, Shen Z, Peng S, Li J, Friedlingstein P (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467(7311):43–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Politti E, Egger G, Angermann K, Rivaes R, Blamauer B, Klösch M et al (2014) Evaluating climate change impacts on Alpine floodplain vegetation. Hydrobiologia 737(1):225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porporato A, Daly E, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (2004) Soil water balance and ecosystem response to climate change. Am Nat 164(5):625–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan N, François L, Huynen MC, Oliveira LC, Hambuckers A (2015) Modelling the distribution of key tree species used by lion tamarins in the Brazilian Atlantic forest under a scenario of future climate change. Reg Environ Change 15(4):683–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid I, Romshoo SA, Chaturvedi RK, Ravindranath NH, Sukumar R, Jayaraman M et al (2015) Projected climate change impacts on vegetation distribution over Kashmir Himalayas. Clim Change 132(4):601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennó CD, Nobre AD, Cuartas LA, Soares JV, Hodnett MG, Tomasella J, Waterloo MJ (2008) HAND, a new terrain descriptor using SRTM-DEM: Mapping terra-firme rainforest environments in Amazonia. Remote Sens Environ 112(9):3469–3481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux PC, Aalto J, Luoto M (2013) Soil moisture’s underestimated role in climate change impact modelling in low-energy systems. Glob Change Biol 19(10):2965–2975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy SS, Balling RC Jr (2004) Trends in extreme daily precipitation indices in India. Int J Climatol 24:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufino RL, Biscaia RCM, Merten GH (1993) Determinação do potencial erosivo da chuva do estado do Paraná, através de pluviometria: Terceira aproximação. Revista brasileira de Ciência do Solo 17(3):439–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruml M, Vuković A, Vujadinović M, Djurdjević V, Ranković-Vasić Z, Atanacković Z et al (2012) On the use of regional climate models: implications of climate change for viticulture in Serbia. Agric For Meteorol 158:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell RC, Currie BJ, Lindsay MD, Mackenzie JS, Ritchie SA, Whelan PI (2009) Dengue and climate change in Australia: predictions for the future should incorporate knowledge from the past. Med J Aust 190(5):265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne SI, Corti T, Davin EL, Hirschi M, Jaeger EB, Lehner I et al (2010) Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth Sci Rev 99(3):125–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw SB, Royem AA, Riha SJ (2011) The relationship between extreme hourly precipitation and surface temperature in different hydroclimatic regions of the United States. J Hydrometeorol 12:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva AM (2001) Índice de erosividade e sua relação com a pluviometria e coeficiente de chuva em Juazeiro (BA). ESALQ, Piracicaba, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva AMD, Alvares CA (2005) Levantamento de informações e estruturação de um banco de dados sobre a erodibilidade de classes de solos no Estado de São Paulo. Geociências 24(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow VT (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Streck NACM (2006) Simulação do impacto da mudança climática sobre a água disponível do solo em agroecossistemas de trigo, soja e milho em Santa Maria, RS. Ciência Rural 36(2):424–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE (1999). Conceptual framework for changes of extremes of the hydrological cycle with climate change. In: Weather and climate extremes. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Val LA, Bahia VG, Freire JC, Dias Júnior MS (1986) Erosividade das chuvas em Lavras, MG. Ciência e prática 10(2):199–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Vianello RL, Pessanha JEM, Sediyama GC (2006). Previsão de ocorrência dos mosquitos da dengue em Belo Horizonte, com base em dados meteorológicos. In: Proceedings of the 14th Congresso Brasileiro de Meteorologia, Florianópolis, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) Dengue and severe dengue. WHO fact sheet No117 (updated September 2014). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. Agriculture Handbook. U.S. Deparment of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH (1959) A rainfall erosion index for a universal soil-loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 23(3):246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon SK, Kim JS, Moon YI (2015) Urban stream overflow probability in a changing climate: Case study of the Seoul Uicheon Basin, Korea. J Hydro Environ Res 13:52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Wu S (2014) Responses of vegetation distribution to climate change in China. Theor Appl Climatol 117(1–2):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Follador .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 1

Annex 1

Flood Model

Results describing physical susceptibility to flood occurrence were produced by crossing data about major relief characteristics such as: Declivity; Stream Order; And Vertical and Horizontal Distance to Stream (Strahler 1964; Rennó et al. 2008), as displayed in Fig. 3.17.

Fig. 3.17
figure 17

Floods submodel flowchart

Extreme precipitation events are closely linked to flood occurrence (Parr et al. 2015; Alfieri et al. 2015; Apurv et al. 2015; Yoon et al. 2015). The indicators of climate extremes selected as model inputs are: Annual count of days with precipitation greater than 10 mm (R10); Annual rainfall during days when precipitation is greater than or equal to the 95th percentile of all humid days of the year, with rainfall values higher than or equal to 1 mm (R95p); Maximum number of consecutive wet days a year (CWD); And Maximum annual rainfall on 5 consecutive days (Rx5 day).

The model results were calibrated and validated by using data from the Sistema Integrado de Informações sobre Desastres (SEDEC) and Atlas Brasileiro de Desastres Naturais (CEPED 2012).

Rainfall Erosivity Model

Figure 3.18 displays the model of rainfall erosivity (i.e., erosive force of rain), based on the equations suggested by Silva (2004); da Silva (2001); Rufino et al. (1993); Neto and Moldenhauer (1992); and Val et al. (1986). Rainfall data include monthly and annual precipitation averages.

Fig. 3.18
figure 18

Potential soil erosion by water submodel flowchart

Landslides Model

Soil slope and erodibility, together with rainfall erosivity, were used to generate an indicator of the physical sensitivity of the system to landslides. The slope was calculated using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for the Topodata-INPE project. The erodibility was classified according to Silva and Alvares (2005) and Lino (2010). The rainfall erosivity characterizes the exposure as described in section “Rainfall Erosivity Model” (Fig. 3.19).

Fig. 3.19
figure 19

Landslide submodel flowchart

All the information was normalized and crossed using a weighted average: erosivity and erodibility were given a weight 0.3 and slope was given a weight of 0.4, since gravity plays an important role in landslides.

The calibration and validation of the model’s output used records provided by the Civil Defence, CEMADEN and newspaper.

Dengue Vector Distribution Model

In general, the model projection of tropical disease vector distribution was constituted from the geostatistical relationships between the distribution of exposure and climatic extremes observed in periods of high infestation, and the data indicating the presence of the vector in the territory. Thus, it is possible to draw up a spatial representation of potential distribution of the tropical disease vector in the face of climate change, including future exposure data. The result is shown by a composed index pointing the susceptibility of the region to this vector (Aedes aegypti). The first indicator presents the probability of occurrence generated by the MAXENT algorithm (Phillips et al. 2004). The second reports on the likely number of vector generations according to temperature limits (Fernandes et al. 2006). The third indicator sets the transmission potential, also related to temperature data (Lambrechts et al. 2011). The fourth indicator designs positivity for hatching eggs, associated with rainfall, temperature and relative humidity (Vianello et al. 2006). In addition, the fifth indicator is known as General Susceptibility Index, a methodology for quantitative assessment of susceptibility (Brasil 2005). The indicators were crossed as the same weight by map algebra and thus it was possible to draw up a spatial representation through a normalized ratio vector distribution of the potential impact of tropical diseases according to climate change as shown in the following Fig. 3.20.

Fig. 3.20
figure 20

Vector diseases submodel flowchart

The results of this model were calibrated using data from the international repository DRYAD and validated by comparison to a study from the University of Oxford (Kraemer et al. 2015).

Soil Moisture Model

Soil moisture is typically incremented through rainfall events and lost through runoff, infiltration to deeper soil layers and groundwater, and evapotranspiration. In turn, the evapotranspiration is controlled by vegetation and atmospheric conditions. The dynamics of water in the soil depends mainly on these processes. Based on this logic, we apply soil equations describing these dynamics (Porporato et al. 2004) to understand how changes in climate conditions may affect soil moisture. Soil moisture estimations are made using a numerical model which implements these equations (Fig. 3.21).

Fig. 3.21
figure 21

Water availability in soil submodel flowchart

This modeling seeks to simplify the large number of processes that make up the dynamics of water in the soil. These hydrological phenomena are accompanied by a high degree of spatiotemporal nonlinearity. The potential evapotranspiration (amount of transpiration which would occur if sufficient water were available), one of the input variables, is obtained from an algorithm described by FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (Allen et al. 1998) that uses minimum, average and maximum temperature related to the extraterrestrial solar radiation latitude.

The result generated by the model is the average predicted soil moisture taking into account climatic, pedological and vegetation conditions. The final product is a prediction of volumetric soil moisture (mm3 of water/mm3 of soil).

The soil moisture maps consistently reproduced the standards expected for tropical regions, with satisfactory agreement in the temporal variability on climate change validated from INPE (National Institute for Space Research) expert judgement (Gevaerd and Freitas 2006) and results design by MODIS project.

Vegetation Type Model

The projections were made by Maximum Entropy model approach—MAXENT (Phillips et al. 2004). The entropy concept refers to the uncertainty of a probability distribution. The MAXENT is an algorithm that seeks to calculate and minimize this uncertainty, finding the nearest future distribution of real uniform distribution, based on the constraints of environmental variables available. The algorithm seeks this new distribution by minimizing a measure of divergence between actual and simulated results, given the same set of constraints. The actual phytophysiognomy data, together with historical environmental variables, are used as model inputs to calibrate and set the constraints. Subsequently, the restrictions set by the MAXENT algorithm are used to reference the likelihood occurrence of vegetation type in relation to the constraints identified in the spatial distribution of future climate variables. Therefore, input data for the model were: occurrences of phytophysiognomies; soil moisture; topography information; historical climatic exposure and weather extremes for calibration and future data for the generation of projections of potential distributions. The data resulting from this analysis indicates the potential distribution of vegetation type according to future climate conditions, as shown in Fig. 3.22.

Fig. 3.22
figure 22

Vegetation type submodel flowchart

Because of the low availability of supporting data, the results of changes in the distribution of vegetation types were validated by Report No. 6: Climate Change and possible changes in South America Biomes (Marengo 2007).

Agro-climatic Zoning Model

This impact was modeled from the variation of climatic characteristics, which mainly influence the phases of germination and grain filling, crucial to a good crop yield. The form and extent of climate change, related to the physical aspects of the environment, affect the optimal conditions of agricultural productivity of a region can be analyzed from these results. The site is considered to have low susceptibility to climate impacts if the chance of successful harvest is at least 80%.

The Water Requirement Satisfaction Index (WRSI), the ratio between the actual and the maximum level of agricultural evapotranspiration, was used as a measure of the crop water stress. The modeling was performed by using the data of the soil moisture submodel as an input to the Eagleman (1971) equation to define the real coefficient of culture. To the maximum coefficient, tabulated data are listed per culture. The air temperature rasters and extraterrestrial solar radiation are used as inputs in the evapotranspiration sub-model. These data reported above are the input components in the FAO methodology notebook 56 (Allen et al. 1998) to define the actual and maximum evapotranspiration, which is used to calculate the WRSI as shown in Fig. 3.23.

Fig. 3.23
figure 23

Agro-climatic zoning submodel flowchart

The crops considered in the preparation of this study (maize, soybean, beans, cotton, sugarcane and rice) were those viewed as strategic for the economy and food security of Brazil. The results are shown sorted by a WRSI ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values suggesting lower degrees of water stress. The information generated by the model was validated using experimental results of the study by Embrapa (Assad et al. 2013), for maps of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA) and results of the project (MODIS).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Follador, M. et al. (2018). Modelling Potential Biophysical Impacts of Climate Change in the Atlantic Forest: Closing the Gap to Identify Vulnerabilities in Brazil. In: Leal Filho, W., Esteves de Freitas, L. (eds) Climate Change Adaptation in Latin America. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56946-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics