Abstract
The paper is devoted to the discussion of the controversial issue concerning bilingual teacher training. The research will be carried out among BA students trained to become both English and Spanish teachers as well as among lecturers involved in training these students. The aim of the research is to find both the students’ and the teachers’ opinion about the effectiveness of bilingual teacher training paying attention to its strengths and weaknesses. The author will consider, among others, such factors as: course curriculum (i.e., the list of subjects devoted to English and Spanish, culture and foreign language methodology training as well as the amount of hours devoted to each subject) and the students’ competence in English and Spanish. The students will be asked to express their opinions on their competence as far as practical English and Spanish are concerned as well as methodology of teaching English and Spanish as a foreign language. The teachers, on the other hand, will be expected to evaluate the students’ language competence as well as their potential competence to teach English and Spanish as foreign languages. The author intends to use two types of research tools: interview with teachers and questionnaire for students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
CILT/InterAct International. (2007). Effects on the European Union economy of shortages of foreign language skills in enterprise (ELAN). Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/languages/policy/strategic-framework/documents/elan_en.pdf
Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Social Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (2005). A new framework strategy for multilingualism. Brussels. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=uriserv:c11084
Dawaele, J. M. (2007). Becoming bi- or multi-lingual later in life. In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 102–130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Edwards, J. (1994). Multilingualism. London: Penguin Books.
Kelly, M., & Grenfell, M. (2004). European profile for language teacher education: A frame of reference. University of Southampton. Retrieved from http://www.lang.soton.ac.uk/profile/report/MainReport.pdf
Kemp, Ch. (2009). Defining multilingualism. In L. Aronin & B. Hufeisen (Eds.), The exploration of multilingualism (pp. 11–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
McArthur, T. (Ed.). (1992). The oxford companion to the english language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. (2012). Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 17 stycznia 2012 r. Dz. U. z dnia 6 lutego 2012 r. poz. 131 w sprawie standardów kształcenia przygotowującego do zawodu nauczyciela. Retrieved from http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20120000131
Paradowski, M. B. (2010). The benefits of multilingualism—Full article. Retrieved from http://www.multilingualliving.com/2010/05/01/the-benefits-of-multilingualism-full-article/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Minimum number of hours assigned to classes and practices and minimum number of ECTS points assigned to particular modules (retrieved from http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20120000131)
Module | Module components | Hours | ECTS points |
---|---|---|---|
Module 1 Content preparation to teach the first subject | Content preparation—in accordance with the description of the teaching outcomes for a carried out field of studies | * | ** |
Module 2 Psycho-pedagogical preparation | General psycho-pedagogical preparation | 90 | 10 |
Practice | 30 | ||
Practice | 30 | ||
Module 3 Didactic preparation | Bases of didactics | 30 | 15 |
Subject didactics at a given educational stage or at given educational stages | 90 | ||
Practice | 120 | ||
Module 4 Preparation to teach the following subject | Content preparation | * | ** |
Subject didactics at a given educational stage or at given educational stages | 60 | 10–15 | |
Practice | 60 | ||
Module 5 Preparation in the field of special pedagogy | Special psycho-pedagogical preparation | 140 | 25 |
Special didactics | 90 | ||
Practice | 120 |
Appendix 2: Questionnaire for the Students
Questionnaire
Dear ladies and gentleman,
I am preparing an article on Bilingual Teacher Training: Success or Failure (A Students’ and Teachers’ Perspective). Please complete the questionnaire below. The obtained answers will enable me to evaluate the phenomenon of bilingual teacher training from students’ point of view. Make sure that the answers contain maximum 1 to 3 sentences. Time allowed to complete the questionnaire: 40 min.
Respondent’s particulars
-
1.
\(\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\text{Gender}} & {} & {} & {} & {\text{F}} & {} & {} & {} & {} & {} & {\text{M}} \\ \end{array}\)
-
2.
Age__________________________
-
3.
How long have you been learning English?__________________________
-
4.
Please evaluate your proficiency in English (according to the CEF scale)
\(\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\text{A1}} & {} & {} & {\text{A2}} & {} & {} & {{\text{B}}1} & {} & {} & {{\text{B}}2} & {} & {} & {{\text{C}}1} & {} & {} & {{\text{C}}2} \\ \end{array}\)
-
5.
How long have you been learning Spanish?________________________
-
6.
Please evaluate your proficiency in Spanish (according to the CEF scale)
\(\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\text{A1}} & {} & {} & {\text{A2}} & {} & {} & {{\text{B}}1} & {} & {} & {{\text{B}}2} & {} & {} & {{\text{C}}1} & {} & {} & {{\text{C}}2} \\ \end{array}\)
-
7.
What made you choose the field of studies connected with bilingual teacher training?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
8.
What were your expectations concerning the studies?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
9.
Have you met the expectations? Why yes or no?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
10.
Please point to the advantages of the covered curriculum
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
11.
Please point to the disadvantages of the covered curriculum.
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
12.
Is the choice of the subjects included in the curriculum correct? Why yes or no?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
13.
Which subject are, according to you, irrelevant and which should be added?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
14.
Is the order in which the subjects are covered correct? If not, what changes do you suggest?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
15.
Is the amount of hours assigned to particular subjects enough? If not, which subjects should have more and which fewer hours?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
16.
What other changes, according to you, should be introduced in the curriculum?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
-
17.
Do you think that the idea of bilingual teacher training is success or failure? Why success or why failure?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Appendix 3: Interview Questions
-
1.
What is your opinion on bilingual teacher training?
-
2.
What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this type of training?
-
3.
Do you think that it is possible to train a teacher of two languages in a three-year cycle assuming that the candidates come with a B2 proficiency level of the main language and they study the second language from scratch?
-
4.
How do you evaluate the students’ competence in the language you are teaching? What are their biggest problems? What does not cause them problems?
-
5.
You are preparing the students to write a diploma work in methodology of the language you are teaching. What problems do students have while writing the diploma work?
-
6.
Do you consider the discussed type of training success or failure? Why?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krawczyk-Neifar, E. (2017). Bilingual Teacher Training: Failure or Success? A Students’ and Teachers’ Perspective. In: Gabryś-Barker, D., Gałajda, D., Wojtaszek, A., Zakrajewski, P. (eds) Multiculturalism, Multilingualism and the Self. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56892-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56892-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56891-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56892-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)