Abstract
One might think it is obvious in a military conflict who has won and who has lost. But is it? It seems to be commonly accepted that the Americans actually lost the Vietnam War, even though they won all or most of the actual battles on the ground. Wars, modern military theory states, are not won on the battlefield – they are won in people’s minds, in the cognitive domain. To secure the support of the population for participating in military operations a government must therefore present good, persuasive reasons. Such reasons have come to be called “war narratives”. A war narrative can be seen as a reason whose job it is to bolster the conclusion that participation in a war, often far away from home territory, is legitimate and right. In this chapter we discuss the content and function of war narratives: what they say; why they arise; the audiences they are aimed at, and how they fare over time. This latter issue is particularly important, we suggest, because war narratives may erode if or when counter-evidence piles up as military events unfold. If that happens the narrative becomes a liability to its narrator. The audience becomes skeptical and retracts its support – the narrative fails to persuade and the war might be lost.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aristotle. 1982. The Poetics. Trans. James Hutton. New York: W. W. Norton.
Bitzer, L. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.
Bøe-Hansen, O. 2013. Narrativets rolle i den nasjonale strategien [The role of the narrative in the national strategy]. In Strategisk suksess – norsk maktbruk i Libya og Afghanistan [Strategic success – Norwegian use of force in Libya and Afghanistan], ed. O. Bøe-Hansen, T. Heier and J.H. Matlary, 42–57. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
———. 2014. Narrativet som maktfaktor i internasjonale operasjoner [The narrative as a power factor in international operations]. In Norge i internasjonale operasjoner: militærmakt mellom idealer og realpolitik [Norway in international operations: between ideals and reality], ed. T. Heier, A. Kjølberg and C.F. Rønnfeldt, 54–63. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
British National Security Council. 2012. Joint doctrine note 1/12, strategic communication: The defence contribution. Shrivenham: Development, Concepts and Doctrine Center.
Bruner, J. 2002. Making stories. Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burke, K. 1945. A grammar of motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Clausewitz, C. Von. 1976. On war. Princeton University Press: Princeton. Originally published 1832.
Danto, A.C. 1985. Narration and knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.
Defence Staff Norway. 2007. Norwegian armed forces joint operational doctrine. Oslo: The Defence Staff.
De Graaf, B., G. Dimitriu, and J. Ringsmose, eds. 2015. Strategic narratives, public opinion, and war. Oxford/London: Routledge.
Goldman, E. 2007. Strategic communication: A tool for asymmetric warfare. Small Wars Journal: 1–7.
Govier, T. 1999. The philosophy of argument. Newport News: Vale Press.
Johnson, R. 2013. The role of audience in argumentation from the perspective of informal logic. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4): 533–549.
Joint Forces Commanders. 2006. Joint publication 3–13, Information Operations, Joint Chiefs of Staff Official Norwegian Reports 2016:8 (NOU). A good ally – Norway in Afghanistan 2001–2014.
Ornatowski, C.M. 2012. Rhetoric goes to war: The evolution of the United States of America’s narrative of the “War on terror”. African Yearbook of Rhetoric 3 (3): 65–74.
Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new Rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ricoeur, P. 1984. Time and narrative. Vol. I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Riessman, C.K. & J. Speedy. 2007. Narrative inquiry in the psychotherapy professions: A critical review. In Handbook of narrative inquiry, ed. D.J. Clandinin, 426–456. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rodden, R. 2008. How do stories convince us? Notes towards a rhetoric of narrative. College Literature 35 (1): 148–173.
Shea, J.P. 2002. The Kosovo crisis and the media: Reflections of a NATO spokesman. In Lessons from Kosovo – The KFOR experience, ed. L. Wentz. Washington, DC: Department of Defense Command and Control Research Program (DoD CCRP).
Tindale, C. 1992. Audiences, relevance, and cognitive environments. Argumentation 6: 177–188.
———. 2013. Rhetorical argumentation and the nature of audience: Toward an understanding of audience-issues in argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4): 508–532.
Vlahos, M. 2006. The long war: A self-fulfilling prophecy of protracted conflict – And defeat. The National Interest. http://nationalinterest.org/?id=11982.
White, H. 1978. The historical text as literary artifact. In The writing of history, ed. R.H. Canary and H. Kozicki, 41–62. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Web 2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/sep/21/september11.usa13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kvernbekk, T., Bøe-Hansen, O. (2017). How to Win Wars: The Role of the War Narrative. In: Olmos, P. (eds) Narration as Argument. Argumentation Library, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56882-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56883-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)