Abstract
An integrated approach to building performance evaluation mandates that post-occupancy evaluation subjective tools be matched by metrics (POE + M). While leveraging occupants as sensors to quickly capture indoor environmental quality or IEQ conditions in a work environment is valuable, the addition of measured environmental conditions across all variables, and of carefully captured records of critical workplace attributes that define their physical environments, are equally critical to understanding building occupant comfort, satisfaction, health, and performance. With over 15 years of POE + M field measurements in office workplaces, the Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics (CBPD) at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) has a database of over 1600 workstations with statistically significant findings about the measured and user-perceived quality of the indoor environment, as well as the technical attributes of building systems that contribute to successful, high performance buildings. This chapter provides an overview of the National Environmental Assessment Toolkit (NEAT) developed with the US General Services Administration (GSA), and an array of findings that will catalyze future indoor environmental standards and improve building enclosure, mechanical, lighting, and interior design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ASHRAE. (1997). Standard 129-1997: Measuring air change effectiveness. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2010a). Standard 62.1-2010: Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2010b). Standard 55-2010: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
ASHRAE. (2013). Handbook for workplace acoustic quality assessment. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Aziz, A., Loftness, V., & Srivastava, V. (2007). Post-occupancy evaluation: Indoor environmental assessment toolkit—EnviroBot. In F. Shafii & M. Zahri Othman (Eds.). Proceedings of conference on sustainable building Southeast Asia (pp. 182–190). Johor, Malaysia: Institute Sultan Iskandar of Urban Habitat and Highrise, Level 4, Dewan Sultan Iskandar, University.
BRAB (Building Research Advisory Board). (1988). Electronically enhanced office buildings. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Science.
Brager, G., Heerwagen, J., Bauman, F., Huizenga, C., Powell, K., Ruland, A., et al. (2000). Team spaces and collaboration: Links to the physical environment. Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment, University of California.
CBPD (Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics). (2009). Energy savings and performance gains in general services administration buildings: Seven recommendations. US General Services Administration.
CBPD (Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics) (2013). National environmental assessment toolkit (NEAT) manual. Carnegie Mellon University. http://neat-cbpd.arc.cmu.edu/neat/manual/NEAT-Manual.pdf. Accessed on 12 Jan 2017.
Choi, J.-H., Loftness, V., & Aziz, A. (2012). Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines. Energy and Buildings, 46(3), 167–175.
de Dear, R., & Brager, G. (2002). Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: Revisions to ASHRAE standard 55. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 549–561.
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2007). Testing for indoor air quality, section 01 81 09. US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/018109.pdf. Accessed 1April 2009.
Hartkopf, V., Loftness, V., & Mill, P. (1985). Integration for performance. In R. Rush (Ed.), The building systems integration handbook (pp. 231–316). New York: Wiley.
Hartkopf, V., Loftness, V., & Mill, P. (1986). The concept of total building performance and building diagnostics. In G. Davis (Ed.), Building performance: Function, preservation, and rehabilitation, STP23009S (pp. 5–22). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Heschong, L. (2002). Daylighting and human performance. ASHRAE Journal, 44(6), 65.
IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America). (2011). The IESNA lighting handbook (10th ed.). New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
Jones, B. (2002). Capabilities and limitations of thermal models for use in thermal comfort standards. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 653–659.
Loftness, V., Aziz, A., Choi, J., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K., Atkinson, M., et al. (2009). The value of post-occupancy evaluation for building occupants and facility managers. Intelligent Buildings International, 1(4), 249–268.
Loftness, V., Aziz, A., Hua, Y., Srivastava, V., & Yang, X. (2007). GSA WP 20•20 Environmental Quality Report: Kluczynski Federal Building, Before- and After-renovation Comparison. Chicago, IL: US General Services Administration.
Mendell, M., Lei-Gomez, Q., Mirer, A., Seppänen, O., & Brunner, G. (2008). Risk factors in heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systems for occupant symptoms in US Office Buildings: The US EPA BASE Study. Indoor Air, 18(4), 301–316.
Park, J. (2015). Are humans good sensors? Using Occupants as sensors for indoor environmental quality assessment and for developing thresholds that matter. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Park, J., Aziz, A., & Loftness, V. (2013). Post-occupancy evaluation for energy conservation, superior IEQ and increased occupant satisfaction. In Proceedings of the IFMA’s World workplace conference, Philadelphia, PA. https://ifma.confex.com/ifma/ww2013/webprogram/Session3887.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2017.
Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post-occupancy Evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. (republished 2015, London: Routledge).
Rush, R. (1986). The building systems integration handbook: American Institute of Architects. New York, NY: Wiley.
Satish, U., Mendell, M. J., Shekhar, K., Hotchi, T., Sullivan, D., Streufert, S., et al. (2012). Is CO2 an indoor pollutant? Direct effects of low-to-moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision-making performance. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(12), 1671.
Seppänen, O., Fisk, W., & Mendell, M. (2004). Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. Indoor Air, 9(4), 226–252.
Van der Linden, A., Boerstra, A. C., Raue, A. K., Kurvers, S. R., & De Dear, R. (2006). Adaptive temperature limits: A new guideline in the Netherlands: A new approach for the assessment of building performance with respect to thermal indoor climate. Energy and Buildings, 38(1), 8–17.
Veitch, J. A., Charles, K. E., Farley, K. M., & Newsham, G. R. (2007). A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 177–189.
Acknowledgements
This National Environment Assessment Toolkit research and development was made possible by support from the U.S. General Services Administration. The authors would like to thank Kevin Kampschroer, Judy Heerwagen, Kevin Powell, and Michael Atkinson of the GSA, as well as a host of Ph.D. and Masters students of the Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics at Carnegie Mellon University, who supported data acquisition, processing, analysis and reporting.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loftness, V., Hartkopf, V., Aziz, A., Choi, JH., Park, J. (2018). Critical Frameworks for Building Evaluation: User Satisfaction, Environmental Measurements and the Technical Attributes of Building Systems (POE + M). In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)