Abstract
Post-Occupancy Evaluations (POEs) have been defined as “the process of evaluating buildings in a systematic and rigorous manner after they have been built and occupied for some time” (Preiser et al. 1988, p. 3). One important objective of POEs is to glean lessons-learned from the review of completed buildings to improve design strategies for future projects. For Vischer (2001, p. 23), it is about “learning how a building performs once it is built, including if and how well it has met expectations.” This is a ‘rear-view’ approach to POEs, in order to feed forward future design decisions, and has served as an important tool for designing better spaces. Another application of POEs is addressed less frequently yet extremely useful to college and university building owners and managers. Campus representatives continually face decisions about the future of the facilities they steward. While building evaluations often focus on physical conditions such as structural, mechanical and building envelope to understand life expectancy, the central goal of campus buildings is to support an institution’s mission and activities. Higher education systems are quickly evolving and changing and many campus buildings throughout the North America have become functionally obsolete. Functional evaluations, similar to Indicative POEs described by Preiser et al., can provide valuable information to decision makers about an institution's existing building stock.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bordass, B., & Leaman, A. (2009). An overview of post-occupancy evaluation. Retrieved from www.usablebuildings.co.uk. Accessed 6 Aug 2016.
Duffy, F. (2005). Research, practice and architectural knowledge. Retrieved from https://www.architecture.com/Files/RIBAProfessionalServices/ResearchAndDevelopment/Symposium/FrankDuffy.pdf. Accessed 6 Aug 2016.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S., McDonough, M., Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Karim, H., & Crozier, C. (2009). Post-occupancy evaluation: Purpose, benefits and barriers. Facilities, 27(1/2), 21–33.
Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988), Post-occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold (republished 2015, London: Routledge).
Preiser, W. F. E., & Smith, K. H. (2011). Universal design handbook. London: Routledge.
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). Mind, brain, and education science: A comprehensive guide to the new brain-based teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.
Vischer, J. C. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: A multifaceted tool for building improvement. In Federal Facilities (Ed.), Council, learning from our buildings: A state-of-the-practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation (pp. 23–34). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bain, B. (2018). The College and University Campus: Facility Assessments for Long Term Decision Making. In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)