Abstract
A post-occupancy evaluation (POE) feeds data back into the design process as a measurement of the gap between planned and actual performance of a building. The most common application is to evaluate the performance of a facility once it is occupied. The army calls this post evaluation “ground truth,” an assessment of what happened in the field differently from how the strategy was planned. A POE aims at improving the quality and performance of the design process and its final product (see Fig. 18.1). One definition of excellence is the quality of experiences the project brings to all the categories of stakeholders: clients, design team, builders, users, the public, and the profession. A POE is thus part of the building performance evaluation (BPE) process and provides the benefits of a holistic view on the building life cycle of a project, including life cycle phases from strategic planning and programming, through design, and to post occupancy—with the related review loops, offering feedback loop as adjustments to existing building forms and feeding forward into design standards and guidelines (Dodson 2011).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Dodson, M. (2011). A dossier on post occupancy evaluation: Post occupancy. Architecture Australia, 100, 5.
Fairley, P. (2015). Feedback loop: With a frequent gap between predicted and actual performance, post-occupancy evaluations begin to catch on. Architectural Record, 203(8), 114–120.
Gonchar, J. (2008). Looking back and moving forward. Architectural Record, 196(2), 160–169.
Merkel, J. (2003). Healthcare architecture now. Architectural Record, 191(3), 11–17.
Pena, W. M., & Parshall, S. A. (2011). Problem Seeking: An architectural programming primer. Washington, DC: Wiley.
Preiser, W. F. E., & Nasar, J. (2008). Assessing building performance: Its evolution from post-occupancy evaluation. ArchNet-IJAR, International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 84–99.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are owed to members of the project team for their professionalism and dedication: Sid Sanders, Kate Rose (Core), Mike Smith (Core); MLSH Lead Team: Chris Siebenaler (Lead), Lowell Stanton (Lead), Janet Leatherwood (Lead), Becky Chalupa (Lead), Sean Sevy (Lead), and HOK: Ron Smith, Sara Bullington, Ricardo Socorro, Nick Watkins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parshall, S., Fonseca, S. (2018). Towards Wellbeing: Hospital Evaluation Using the Problem-Seeking Method. In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)